Well we've scored 24 which if you look at the table is pretty comparable to most teams around us. We were never going to create the chances we did last year.The 17 Bus wrote:One salient point is that RFC did not create very much, seems the same all season, do we still have the lowest shots on target in the division?
I just fail to see us creating, which is spoiling it for me, and we do not really seem to push on, same as creating I suppose.
Also, we don't tend to aimlessly shoot from outside the area like a lot of teams so that will keep the number of shots down.Stranded wrote:Well we've scored 24 which if you look at the table is pretty comparable to most teams around us. We were never going to create the chances we did last year.The 17 Bus wrote:One salient point is that RFC did not create very much, seems the same all season, do we still have the lowest shots on target in the division?
I just fail to see us creating, which is spoiling it for me, and we do not really seem to push on, same as creating I suppose.
On the plus side, if we have the lowest amount of shots on target then we must have one of the highest conversation rates.
Of course it depends on which package you take. Orange is quite cheap I hear. But then of course a landline is cheapest by far.Stranded wrote:we must have one of the highest conversation rates.
i doubt it somewhat....alad wrote:I was cheering on Reading today m8, but just telling it like it is.notloyalenuffroyal wrote:Abuse???????? Neveralad wrote:Heres a non biased view from someone who knows what he's talking about.
Of course you are the most enlightened of fans as ever alad! Your non biased opinions are well respected on this board and your outstanding match report shows the hallmarks of genius.
We shall of course bow down before your worshipfulness and listen to your clear and concise views knowing that you would never be influenced by your obsession with - what we all know as - "the best and biggest club in the world!"
Now OXF*ORD OFF AND LET US RANT LIKE REAL FOOTBALL FANS.
NON - BIASED **********MY ARSE***********
Now now, less of the bitterness Sharpy.Sharpy wrote:i doubt it somewhat....alad wrote:I was cheering on Reading today m8, but just telling it like it is.notloyalenuffroyal wrote: Abuse???????? Never
Of course you are the most enlightened of fans as ever alad! Your non biased opinions are well respected on this board and your outstanding match report shows the hallmarks of genius.
We shall of course bow down before your worshipfulness and listen to your clear and concise views knowing that you would never be influenced by your obsession with - what we all know as - "the best and biggest club in the world!"
Now OXF*ORD OFF AND LET US RANT LIKE REAL FOOTBALL FANS.
NON - BIASED **********MY ARSE***********
anyhow, worst atmosphere ive ever heard at a ground on the radio...all you could hear was Reading fans, all 1500 odd of them. as per usual our passionate support shines through
so if we had more shots we would score moreStranded wrote:
On the plus side, if we have the lowest amount of shots on target then we must have one of the highest conversation rates.
Like hyeons goal you mean?T.R.O.L.I. wrote: Also, we don't tend to aimlessly shoot from outside the area like a lot of teams so that will keep the number of shots down.
The one that went in?The 17 Bus wrote:Like hyeons goal you mean?T.R.O.L.I. wrote: Also, we don't tend to aimlessly shoot from outside the area like a lot of teams so that will keep the number of shots down.
and Reading do shoot, our 4 goals in the last 2 games show this. They just don't shoot everytime they see the goal in the corner of their eye like some teams.The 17 Bus wrote:if you dont shoot you dont score, simple really.
Think Chelseaif you dont shoot you dont score, simple really.
In summary then:alad wrote:Heres a non biased view from someone who knows what he's talking about.
Man Utd were the better side, the game was totally one sided especially in the second half and that is reflected in the possession and shot stats. Reading scored as a result of two woeful errors and never looked like creating anything themselves BUT United's first and third goals were offside IMO so Reading can feel hard done by. In defence of the linesman for the third his view was blocked by a United player.
I thought United played OK but only really played well for 30 mins in the second half when they stepped it up. If Rooney and Ronaldo has stayed on the score would have been five or six as they (and Giggs) were tearing Reading to bits. The decision to bring them off and bring Richardson and Fletcher on almost backfired on Ferguson. That said they had enough chances to win two or three games and only some good keeping from Marcus kept the score down.
I thought Reading were disappointing and didn't play nearly as well as they had at Chelsea, but part of that was down to facing a much better side. A plus point has to be Lita, in both of the toughest away games of the season he has done little but when a chance has come his way he has finished it, a sign of a good striker and fair play to him. Doyle was non existant today and it looks as if being played out of position combined with the sheer amount of football he has played this season has caught up with him.
The ref was wrong to send Sodje off, but you can't go around lunging in at players when you have just come on.
Man of the match for me was Ronaldo, he was in a different league to everyone on the pitch today and set up the first and scored the other two. No one really stood out for me in the Reading side except Marcus who made some cracking saves and couldn't have done anything with the goals.
I expect abuse, but my view of the game is spot on and deep down everyone knows it so don't bother showing yourselves up with the predictable abuse.

Chip on your shoulder? More like the Basingstoke Road branch of Harry Ramsden's; get over yourselfalad wrote:Heres a non biased view from someone who knows what he's talking about.....
.....I expect abuse, but my view of the game is spot on and deep down everyone knows it so don't bother showing yourselves up with the predictable abuse.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Doc, Fox Talbot, Royals and Racers, Semrush [Bot], Sutekh and 390 guests