'GREEDbrendywendy wrote:id put bikey in 1st ahead of anyone-even marek
and id play him at the back, in the middle and up front if i could
would be the answer to all our problems IMOBill Oddie's Beard wrote:'GREEDbrendywendy wrote:id put bikey in 1st ahead of anyone-even marek
and id play him at the back, in the middle and up front if i could
Perhaps that's why we haven't spent any money this summer. Coppell is waiting on the results of an Andre Bikey cloning experiment which the club has been backing financially for the last year or so. It all makes sense, the answer lies within the squad and all that. It's genius.brendywendy wrote:would be the answer to all our problems IMOBill Oddie's Beard wrote:'GREEDbrendywendy wrote:id put bikey in 1st ahead of anyone-even marek
and id play him at the back, in the middle and up front if i could
he plays at FB for his country alot,
would provide the strength, tackling ability, etc we need in the middle
and would be the big striker we need too
if he played RW he would be awesome there too i expect.
can we clone him?
Yep I agree with you re these three....I'm also far from convinced that Karacan is ready for the Championship.cmonurz wrote:Of course, you are entitled to your opinion Ian, but to me it defies belief that anyone can't see that Bikey is becoming an exceptional player, and is already a massive asset to Reading. When all are fit and present, I see Hahnemann, Doyle and Bikey as the 'definites' for the teamsheet.
I really like Bikey, I even think he has potential in midfield. But not paired with Karacan. Too inexperienced and in theory not very creative.PEARCEY wrote:Yep I agree with you re these three....I'm also far from convinced that Karacan is ready for the Championship.cmonurz wrote:Of course, you are entitled to your opinion Ian, but to me it defies belief that anyone can't see that Bikey is becoming an exceptional player, and is already a massive asset to Reading. When all are fit and present, I see Hahnemann, Doyle and Bikey as the 'definites' for the teamsheet.
sounds like a songBill Oddie's Beard wrote:Perhaps that's why we haven't spent any money this summer. Coppell is waiting on the results of an Andre Bikey cloning experiment which the club has been backing financially for the last year or so. It all makes sense, the answer lies within the squad and all that. It's genius.
We all dream of a team of Andre Bikeys...
Dont see him as a left back....he would be wasted there...central midfield alongside Harper and I would keep him there when Matejovsky gets back. I would then play Matejovsky ahead of Convey in a wider left position although not as a winger obviously.kwik-silva wrote:[
Has to be at centre-back for me.rg6royal wrote:When Bikey comes back into the team it will be in the centre of midfield.
I doubt he will get back in there tbh, with Sonko looking very good and Ingi his usual reliable self. We need to strengthen in the midfield, someone who can tackle and Bikey would be perfect for that. Even though Cisse likes to get stuck in he does give away too many fouls.Bill Oddie's Beard wrote:Has to be at centre-back for me.rg6royal wrote:When Bikey comes back into the team it will be in the centre of midfield.
His best position is CB, play him there and sign a bloody midfielder who can tackle.LoyalRoyalFan wrote:Bikey is better placed in the centre of midfield.
i love bikey whereever he playsScarface wrote:His best position is CB, play him there and sign a bloody midfielder who can tackle.LoyalRoyalFan wrote:Bikey is better placed in the centre of midfield.
It's not just a matter of being giant, powerful and good in the air. A good CD partnership needs an almost psychic understanding, complementary positioning, and continual discipline. Ivar may have physical weaknesses but he brings other intangibles that I'm far from convinced you'd get with Sonko/Bikey.West Stand Man wrote:I am amazed that anyone thinks that a pairing of Ingimarsson/Sonko is better than Sonko/Bikey! Those 2 would be a potentially awesome barrier to any CCC strike force.
But a much less well-marshaled and well-organised defence. Ingimarsson's value isn't just in how he plays himself - it's also the effect he has on the others, and I don't think either Sonko or Bikey is yet experienced or mature/focused enough to play that roll well enough.West Stand Man wrote:I am amazed that anyone thinks that a pairing of Ingimarsson/Sonko is better than Sonko/Bikey! Those 2 would be a potentially awesome barrier to any CCC strike force.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 392 guests