Definitely. Changing shirt mid-game to impersonate the opposition is not tolerated thesedays.Orion1871 wrote:If he was in a WBA shirt then it would have been given as a foul.Sutekh wrote:Rae said afterwards Hendrick was fouled. Any fans there agree? And will the TV replay will support that view?Millsy wrote:Hendrick back to be shit again.
Yeah, well....leon wrote:
I’m bored of watching Joao.
Even perennial Joao critic Mick Gooding credited him with a good performance in the second half and, in my opinion, it was a good performance. Like too many of our team he was poor for the first 30 minutes but thereafter got better and better. Worked pretty hard, held ball up well, showed some good skills in beating players & bringing team mates into play. WBA clearly regarded him as a threat as they often had two or three players closing on him at times in the second half.Royal Rother wrote:Yeah, well....leon wrote:
I’m bored of watching Joao.
+1. No coincidence we improved when Meite came on for Carroll, who was fairly poor.RoyalBlue wrote:Even perennial Joao critic Mick Gooding credited him with a good performance in the second half and, in my opinion, it was a good performance. Like too many of our team he was poor for the first 30 minutes but thereafter got better and better. Worked pretty hard, held ball up well, showed some good skills in beating players & bringing team mates into play. WBA clearly regarded him as a threat as they often had two or three players closing on him at times in the second half.Royal Rother wrote:Yeah, well....leon wrote:
I’m bored of watching Joao.
Personally I'm getting bored with the constant blinkered lazy, 'Joao is lazy' criticism.
Please show me where I said “lazy”?RoyalBlue wrote:Even perennial Joao critic Mick Gooding credited him with a good performance in the second half and, in my opinion, it was a good performance. Like too many of our team he was poor for the first 30 minutes but thereafter got better and better. Worked pretty hard, held ball up well, showed some good skills in beating players & bringing team mates into play. WBA clearly regarded him as a threat as they often had two or three players closing on him at times in the second half.Royal Rother wrote:Yeah, well....leon wrote:
I’m bored of watching Joao.
Personally I'm getting bored with the constant blinkered lazy, 'Joao is lazy' criticism.
And you can fcuk off as well.Snowflake Royal wrote:+1. No coincidence we improved when Meite came on for Carroll, who was fairly poor.RoyalBlue wrote:Even perennial Joao critic Mick Gooding credited him with a good performance in the second half and, in my opinion, it was a good performance. Like too many of our team he was poor for the first 30 minutes but thereafter got better and better. Worked pretty hard, held ball up well, showed some good skills in beating players & bringing team mates into play. WBA clearly regarded him as a threat as they often had two or three players closing on him at times in the second half.Royal Rother wrote:
Yeah, well....
Personally I'm getting bored with the constant blinkered lazy, 'Joao is lazy' criticism.
Agree, should've scored with a header in the first half though. Did the right thing by trying to glance it across goal, but didn't get enough on it.Hound wrote:Joao was probably our best player last 25 and looked a real threat again. Started running the show up top
He was pretty dire before then as was Carroll
I do wonder what it takes for us to get Meite into the team at the moment. You'd think with our CB's stretched that we could maybe shift to a 4-3-3 and have Meite out on the right somewhere, or even a 4-2-3-1 with Ince central, to get him and Joao into the team as there is always goals there.Snowflake Royal wrote:+1. No coincidence we improved when Meite came on for Carroll, who was fairly poor.RoyalBlue wrote:Even perennial Joao critic Mick Gooding credited him with a good performance in the second half and, in my opinion, it was a good performance. Like too many of our team he was poor for the first 30 minutes but thereafter got better and better. Worked pretty hard, held ball up well, showed some good skills in beating players & bringing team mates into play. WBA clearly regarded him as a threat as they often had two or three players closing on him at times in the second half.Royal Rother wrote:
Yeah, well....
Personally I'm getting bored with the constant blinkered lazy, 'Joao is lazy' criticism.
A very low bar. I'm not sure he looked "a massive threat" at all.Hendo wrote:Agree, should've scored with a header in the first half though. Did the right thing by trying to glance it across goal, but didn't get enough on it.Hound wrote:Joao was probably our best player last 25 and looked a real threat again. Started running the show up top
He was pretty dire before then as was Carroll
I’m not sure anyone did, did they?YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Yeah, wouldn't say Joao was a "massive threat", but probably our biggest in the game and he certainly didn't perform poorly by any means.
I didn't think NGW looked particularly fantastic personally speaking.Hound wrote:I’m not sure anyone did, did they?YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Yeah, wouldn't say Joao was a "massive threat", but probably our biggest in the game and he certainly didn't perform poorly by any means.
yeah sorry "real threat" - point still stands tbhHound wrote:I’m not sure anyone did, did they?YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Yeah, wouldn't say Joao was a "massive threat", but probably our biggest in the game and he certainly didn't perform poorly by any means.
Only got another 30 odd games until his contract is up and then you might get your wish, depending on if he stays on with us or not.leon wrote:yeah sorry "real threat" - point still stands tbhHound wrote:I’m not sure anyone did, did they?YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Yeah, wouldn't say Joao was a "massive threat", but probably our biggest in the game and he certainly didn't perform poorly by any means.
Well that's not my point at all. I don't want to get rid of him I want him to be firing on all cylinders but I'm finding him incredibly frustrating.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Only got another 30 odd games until his contract is up and then you might get your wish, depending on if he stays on with us or not.leon wrote:yeah sorry "real threat" - point still stands tbhHound wrote:
I’m not sure anyone did, did they?
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bazzaballs, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Houlton11, Marcel, RG30, WestYorksRoyal and 141 guests