It makes the 05/06 side look better and better.Snowflake Royal wrote:They always stumble and fall.
They need to win 9 and draw 2, if they lose 1 they need to win the other 10dontbedaft wrote:Yeah - Leeds can only match with 100% record until the end of the season; Ipswich could still beat with 100% until the end of the season and Leicester can only lose twice and win the other 9 which looks much less of a formality than it did a couple of weeks ago...
You're right - 9 wins and a draw would match 106. 10 wins or 9 wins and 2 draws would beat it. Their next three games are all away from home (because of the cup game on the 16th) so let's see if they recover from their wobble...windermereROYAL wrote:They need to win 9 and draw 2, if they lose 1 they need to win the other 10dontbedaft wrote:Yeah - Leeds can only match with 100% record until the end of the season; Ipswich could still beat with 100% until the end of the season and Leicester can only lose twice and win the other 9 which looks much less of a formality than it did a couple of weeks ago...
If someone equals the record would goal difference be taken into account ?dontbedaft wrote:Yeah - Leeds can only match with 100% record until the end of the season; Ipswich could still beat with 100% until the end of the season and Leicester can only lose twice and win the other 9 which looks much less of a formality than it did a couple of weeks ago...
Crusader Royal wrote:If someone equals the record would goal difference be taken into account ?dontbedaft wrote:Yeah - Leeds can only match with 100% record until the end of the season; Ipswich could still beat with 100% until the end of the season and Leicester can only lose twice and win the other 9 which looks much less of a formality than it did a couple of weeks ago...
Because we hold the record outright.Snowball wrote:Crusader Royal wrote:If someone equals the record would goal difference be taken into account ?dontbedaft wrote:Yeah - Leeds can only match with 100% record until the end of the season; Ipswich could still beat with 100% until the end of the season and Leicester can only lose twice and win the other 9 which looks much less of a formality than it did a couple of weeks ago...
We don’t sing, “We’ve got the record, 106, with a GD of 67”
Although if it did…..windermereROYAL wrote:No, it won`t happen anyway.
Crusader Royal wrote:Because we hold the record outright.Snowball wrote:Crusader Royal wrote:
If someone equals the record would goal difference be taken into account ?
We don’t sing, “We’ve got the record, 106, with a GD of 67”
My specific question was whether if two sides achieved 106 would the side with the better goal difference be considered the record holder ?
I assume you aren’t a stats man.
No, it's separate from the record. As the first team to do it, we'd still hold it as the other team would only have equalled us, not beaten us.Crusader Royal wrote:Because we hold the record outright.Snowball wrote:Crusader Royal wrote:
If someone equals the record would goal difference be taken into account ?
We don’t sing, “We’ve got the record, 106, with a GD of 67”
My specific question was whether if two sides achieved 106 would the side with the better goal difference be considered the record holder ?
I assume you aren’t a stats man.
This is correct, if Leicester finish on 106 even with a better GD, we will still hold the record as the first club.Snowflake Royal wrote:No, it's separate from the record. As the first team to do it, we'd still hold it as the other team would only have equalled us, not beaten us.Crusader Royal wrote:Because we hold the record outright.Snowball wrote:
We don’t sing, “We’ve got the record, 106, with a GD of 67”
My specific question was whether if two sides achieved 106 would the side with the better goal difference be considered the record holder ?
I assume you aren’t a stats man.
Also, genuine LOL. Well done.
And because we are an older club than Leicester.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:This is correct, if Leicester finish on 106 even with a better GD, we will still hold the record as the first club.Snowflake Royal wrote:No, it's separate from the record. As the first team to do it, we'd still hold it as the other team would only have equalled us, not beaten us.Crusader Royal wrote:
Because we hold the record outright.
My specific question was whether if two sides achieved 106 would the side with the better goal difference be considered the record holder ?
I assume you aren’t a stats man.
Also, genuine LOL. Well done.
big fan of the asterisk for Lincoln City's efforts under 2 points for a win, I assume.Crusader Royal wrote:Because we hold the record outright.Snowball wrote:Crusader Royal wrote:
If someone equals the record would goal difference be taken into account ?
We don’t sing, “We’ve got the record, 106, with a GD of 67”
My specific question was whether if two sides achieved 106 would the side with the better goal difference be considered the record holder ?
I assume you aren’t a stats man.
IIRC, Lincoln would've got 105 points under three points for a win.stealthpapes wrote:big fan of the asterisk for Lincoln City's efforts under 2 points for a win, I assume.Crusader Royal wrote:Because we hold the record outright.Snowball wrote:
We don’t sing, “We’ve got the record, 106, with a GD of 67”
My specific question was whether if two sides achieved 106 would the side with the better goal difference be considered the record holder ?
I assume you aren’t a stats man.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Irvinchangeyaname, Royals and Racers, stealthpapes, zaskar and 31 guests