by Huntley & Palmer » 20 Mar 2008 14:43
20 Mar 2008 14:43by West Stand Man » 20 Mar 2008 17:11
20 Mar 2008 17:11The trouble with that idea is that we already have too much traffic trying to exit via the Speedway Stadium area, and Costco. Add in more car parks in GP without increasing the capacity of those exits onto the A33 Relief and it will take until about midnight to escape after a 3pm KO!Woodcote Royal wrote:Dead ducks, dodos and white Elephants are starting to form an orderly queue just north of Mortimer........................
Whilst I have no doubt that, sometime in the not too distant future we will start to see the beginnings of a new station at Green Park, the chances of it ever being of much use to Reading fans on match days seems as remote as ever.
Using some of the thousands of empty parking spaces that lie between this much anticipated new facility and the Mad Stad has only ever required permission from the blinkered owners of Green Park, yet nearly a decade since we moved from EP, I am one of a very small number of fans who are lucky enough to enjoy this privilege.
Sorry, but I think there's more chance of flying pigs dive-bombing Lime Square than a train service being provided that will be worth using on matchdays, especially considering the station is going to be three quarters of a mile from the Mad Stad.
by Woodcote Royal » 21 Mar 2008 04:08
21 Mar 2008 04:08I'm not doubting the potential demand, just the likelihood of it being satisfied by a worthwhile service.Huntley & Palmer wrote:Bit strange that you write off the vast majority of West Reading, most of whom I would presume get to the ground via a bus from the station or drive. Add in two pubs that run double decker buses to the ground from this area and I think you would find a rather large amount of people that would get a match day train to Green Park from Reading West.
The whole points is to stop people from driving to the ground, not encourage it which is why Green Park has never been a consideration.
Actually, I take that back. There does look like there has been some clearance on the east side of the line, which given the layout could well be for the station approaches.The Cube wrote:And now for my normal contribution to this topic. Remembered to look out the train window this morning and there is no sign of station-building or approach work on either side of the line.Rhys The Royal wrote:Any progress?
by Rhys The Royal » 05 Jun 2008 20:08
05 Jun 2008 20:08by premiership_bound » 06 Jun 2008 08:51
06 Jun 2008 08:51by North Somerset Royal » 03 Sep 2008 22:25
03 Sep 2008 22:25by West Stand Man » 05 Sep 2008 08:32
05 Sep 2008 08:32???Streets wrote:It has to way way down in the list of priorities now we're back in the Championship and not filling the stadium weekly.
RFC weren't the ones building it, so I don't think which division we are in really matters. If the Pru had their way football supporters would be banned from using it.Streets wrote:It has to way way down in the list of priorities now we're back in the Championship and not filling the stadium weekly.
But what difference does that make to the Pru? As I said they would rather football fans werre banned from using it.Streets wrote:I didn't say we were paying for it. I meant that the fact we are attractind around 5000 less people to that 'area' most weeks, it's useage is greatly reduced and therefore less of a priority now.
But it's not being built for the stadium. It's being built for the business park, you know that big expanse of offices that will lie directly between the station and the stadium. We could get less per week than Reading Town and it would have no effect on the station plans.Streets wrote:I didn't say we were paying for it. I meant that the fact we are attractind around 5000 less people to that 'area' most weeks, it's useage is greatly reduced and therefore less of a priority now.
Not to the Pru, sure, but 20,000 using it for football will far out way the usage to and from the offices in a 2 week period and therefore the football will bring greater revenue.Wycombe Royal wrote:But what difference does that make to the Pru? As I said they would rather football fans werre banned from using it.Streets wrote:I didn't say we were paying for it. I meant that the fact we are attractind around 5000 less people to that 'area' most weeks, it's useage is greatly reduced and therefore less of a priority now.
by Jerry St Clair » 05 Sep 2008 08:54
05 Sep 2008 08:54Streets wrote:I didn't say we were paying for it. I meant that the fact we are attractind around 5000 less people to that 'area' most weeks, it's useage is greatly reduced and therefore less of a priority now.
You're not getting it, so I'm off to find a brick wall as I think I have more chance of getting that to understand the point here.Streets wrote:Not to the Pru, sure, but 20,000 using it for football will far out way the usage to and from the offices in a 2 week period and therefore the football will bring greater revenue.Wycombe Royal wrote:But what difference does that make to the Pru? As I said they would rather football fans werre banned from using it.Streets wrote:I didn't say we were paying for it. I meant that the fact we are attractind around 5000 less people to that 'area' most weeks, it's useage is greatly reduced and therefore less of a priority now.
I take your point that the station is mainly for the business park. I had thought as it was talked up so much that it was very much for the football traffic to and from town, but clearly not so much.
Users browsing this forum: Number 9 and 81 guests