Can see it being a much closer affair than that.TBM wrote:So will Chelsea get torn apart tonight or do you reckon they'll hold on, and maybe even nick a goal on the counter or from a set play
Personally i can see Barca winning this by 3, maybe 4 goals
Explain that one?!soggy biscuit wrote:additional - heard someone comment on the radio yesterday that Abramovich has essentially funded Newcastle's attempt to take 4th place from them, which made me lol slightly
Abramovic gives Chelsea 50m - Chelsea spend 50m on Torres - Liverpool spend 35m of that on Carroll - Newcastle make a number of astute signings using the 35mTBM wrote:Explain that one?!soggy biscuit wrote:additional - heard someone comment on the radio yesterday that Abramovich has essentially funded Newcastle's attempt to take 4th place from them, which made me lol slightly
He hasn't been so hot since Jan. Cisse has come in for big money and carried them to 4th.TBM wrote:LOL - Ba was a free, and tbh he is the main reason they are where they are (as well as Krul who was a free also)
The pitch at the Nou Camp is only 2 yards longer than Stamford Bridge, I'd hardly call that a significant difference. Yes, the way they play and the stadium around it make it seem bigger but width wise they're both 74 yards from what I've seen.TBM wrote:Thing is, Chelsea needed to take a 2 goal lead in to the 2nd leg and then just defend..........Barca WILL score at home, the pitch is huge and they will break Chelsea down eventually....when that happens Chelsea will need to revert to attacking and thats when Barca will run riot
Yes, but there are costs incurred other than just transfer fees.TBM wrote:LOL - Ba was a free, and tbh he is the main reason they are where they are (as well as Krul who was a free also)
Think I read slightly different measurements then. Still, in the grand scheme of things, considering the difference in pitch sizes allowed that's still pretty insignificant. It's one of those cliche's that I don't believe ever really has any founding in truth.TBM wrote:Barca is 115 x 74
Chelsea is 112 v 73
That doesn't sound much but its that little bit bigger to give Barca the edge to get in behind.
What Chelsea need to do is allow Barca to have the ball out wide and not go rushing in to close down.....If the ball is put in to the box, via a cross then Chelsea are more than capable of defending it - its when they get pulled out wide that Barca will hurt them. So basically just let Barca have the width and keep things narrow.
Ashley also stated that no signings would be made unless players left, the Carroll money was the only reason some of those players were signed.....while at the same time seemingly weakening Liverpool & Chelsea with the players brought in toowinchester_royal wrote:Yes, but there are costs incurred other than just transfer fees.TBM wrote:LOL - Ba was a free, and tbh he is the main reason they are where they are (as well as Krul who was a free also)
Cabaye, Santon, Cisse, Ben Arfa all cost money.
Ba's been decent, but you don't get to 4th after 35 games without having a good balance throughout the team.
Yep, for all the fawning over Rodgers this season the manager of the year should be Pardew by a massive margin. I had them down as relegation favourites after Barton, Nolan and Enrique left leaving them looking weaker before the season started.winchester_royal wrote:Yes, but there are costs incurred other than just transfer fees.
Cabaye, Santon, Cisse, Ben Arfa all cost money.
Ba's been decent, but you don't get to 4th after 35 games without having a good balance throughout the team.
Carefree???No Fixed Abode wrote:Carefree wherever you may be, we are the FAMOUS CFC.
C'mon the Chels!
Mockney plolasticNo Fixed Abode wrote:Carefree wherever you may be, we are the FAMOUS CFC.
C'mon the Chels!
Chlorofluorocarbon?No Fixed Abode wrote:we are the FAMOUS CFC.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests