by windermereROYAL » 18 Jan 2020 18:30
18 Jan 2020 18:30by URZZZZ » 18 Jan 2020 18:31
18 Jan 2020 18:31by Old Man Andrews » 18 Jan 2020 18:33
18 Jan 2020 18:33Fantastic supporter.windermereROYAL wrote:Reading fans in a nutshell. bad day at the office, wouldn`t travel to that shithole if I was paid to,
by tidus_mi2 » 18 Jan 2020 18:34
18 Jan 2020 18:34by Zip » 18 Jan 2020 19:33
18 Jan 2020 19:33by windermereROYAL » 18 Jan 2020 19:44
18 Jan 2020 19:44He got half hour on the pitch so lets have a go at him rather than the misfiring forwards from the previous hour. Baldock puts in a good shift but he`s hardly prolific. is he?Zip wrote:Where do we go with Puscas? Is he going to be good enough to produce the goods consistently at this level?
by URZZZZ » 18 Jan 2020 21:41
18 Jan 2020 21:41With every week/game you expect him to improve and work on faults. Yet somehow every week, he actually gets worseZip wrote:Where do we go with Puscas? Is he going to be good enough to produce the goods consistently at this level?
by Hound » 18 Jan 2020 21:52
18 Jan 2020 21:52by windermereROYAL » 18 Jan 2020 21:58
18 Jan 2020 21:58by Snowflake Royal » 18 Jan 2020 22:41
18 Jan 2020 22:41From what I've seen, he's not ready. But it would be foolish to write him off.Zip wrote:Where do we go with Puscas? Is he going to be good enough to produce the goods consistently at this level?
by URZZZZ » 18 Jan 2020 22:41
18 Jan 2020 22:41Yet if you fiddle with the stats, he’s only scored in 3 different games - which, isn’t very goodwindermereROYAL wrote:Still the top scorer, doesn`t say too much about the others does it? but because he`s come in with big expectations he`s getting most of the flak.
by Zip » 18 Jan 2020 23:43
18 Jan 2020 23:43He is a misfiring forward himself is he not? He has scored in three League games this season which is disappointing. He has shown at times that there is real potential but it’s only been glimpses.windermereROYAL wrote:He got half hour on the pitch so lets have a go at him rather than the misfiring forwards from the previous hour. Baldock puts in a good shift but he`s hardly prolific. is he?Zip wrote:Where do we go with Puscas? Is he going to be good enough to produce the goods consistently at this level?
by muirinho » 19 Jan 2020 15:52
19 Jan 2020 15:52It was something we were really good at in 16/17, under Stam. For whatever reason, that team had a real belief, and came back from some absolute tonkings. We lost 2 games in a row just three times all season.URZZZZ wrote:
But we were always going to lose at some point and as I pointed out after the Fulham game, the best measure of the potential of this team is the reaction to a loss/couple of losses. We don't want a 14/15 or 15/16 type end where we just drift away
by Snowflake Royal » 19 Jan 2020 16:44
19 Jan 2020 16:44Could we?muirinho wrote:It was something we were really good at in 16/17, under Stam. For whatever reason, that team had a real belief, and came back from some absolute tonkings. We lost 2 games in a row just three times all season.URZZZZ wrote:
But we were always going to lose at some point and as I pointed out after the Fulham game, the best measure of the potential of this team is the reaction to a loss/couple of losses. We don't want a 14/15 or 15/16 type end where we just drift away
We won the games immediately after being beaten 5-0, 7-1, 3-0.
Right now we could easily lose the next 4 games though.
by muirinho » 19 Jan 2020 18:56
19 Jan 2020 18:56What I meant was - they are all very losable games on paper. So, IMO it wouldn't be a shocking indictment of Bowen & the team if we did lose all 4 of them. But if we win one & draw a couple, it's a good sign.Snowflake Royal wrote:Could we?muirinho wrote:It was something we were really good at in 16/17, under Stam. For whatever reason, that team had a real belief, and came back from some absolute tonkings. We lost 2 games in a row just three times all season.URZZZZ wrote:
But we were always going to lose at some point and as I pointed out after the Fulham game, the best measure of the potential of this team is the reaction to a loss/couple of losses. We don't want a 14/15 or 15/16 type end where we just drift away
We won the games immediately after being beaten 5-0, 7-1, 3-0.
Right now we could easily lose the next 4 games though.
We've lost 4 games under Bowen, max 2 in a row and we've gone no more than 3 without winning.
by URZZZZ » 20 Jan 2020 10:19
20 Jan 2020 10:19I’m assuming you’re talking about Forest, Bristol, Cardiff and Hull because they are our next four games. Whilst Forest will be tricky, I don’t think the other three are that tricky at all and thus losing all four would be a shocking set of resultsmuirinho wrote:What I meant was - they are all very losable games on paper. So, IMO it wouldn't be a shocking indictment of Bowen & the team if we did lose all 4 of them. But if we win one & draw a couple, it's a good sign.Snowflake Royal wrote:Could we?muirinho wrote:
It was something we were really good at in 16/17, under Stam. For whatever reason, that team had a real belief, and came back from some absolute tonkings. We lost 2 games in a row just three times all season.
We won the games immediately after being beaten 5-0, 7-1, 3-0.
Right now we could easily lose the next 4 games though.
We've lost 4 games under Bowen, max 2 in a row and we've gone no more than 3 without winning.
by Hound » 20 Jan 2020 10:37
20 Jan 2020 10:37the way Leeds and WBA are currently performing, you'd hope for at least a point from eachURZZZZ wrote:I’m assuming you’re talking about Forest, Bristol, Cardiff and Hull because they are our next four games. Whilst Forest will be tricky, I don’t think the other three are that tricky at all and thus losing all four would be a shocking set of resultsmuirinho wrote:What I meant was - they are all very losable games on paper. So, IMO it wouldn't be a shocking indictment of Bowen & the team if we did lose all 4 of them. But if we win one & draw a couple, it's a good sign.Snowflake Royal wrote: Could we?
We've lost 4 games under Bowen, max 2 in a row and we've gone no more than 3 without winning.
It’s the week after that run I’m concerned about, West Brom, Leeds and Sheffield Wednesday
by Old Man Andrews » 20 Jan 2020 12:15
20 Jan 2020 12:15Come on Hound, we are not going to get anything from Leeds. We have to be realistic here.Hound wrote:the way Leeds and WBA are currently performing, you'd hope for at least a point from eachURZZZZ wrote:I’m assuming you’re talking about Forest, Bristol, Cardiff and Hull because they are our next four games. Whilst Forest will be tricky, I don’t think the other three are that tricky at all and thus losing all four would be a shocking set of resultsmuirinho wrote:
What I meant was - they are all very losable games on paper. So, IMO it wouldn't be a shocking indictment of Bowen & the team if we did lose all 4 of them. But if we win one & draw a couple, it's a good sign.
It’s the week after that run I’m concerned about, West Brom, Leeds and Sheffield Wednesday
who knows with Sheff Weds
by muirinho » 20 Jan 2020 14:45
20 Jan 2020 14:45All opinions isn't it? I think Cardiff is losable because Bowen will probably play the U23s, and I'd be more worried about Bristol and Forest than about Wednesday or Leeds.URZZZZ wrote:I’m assuming you’re talking about Forest, Bristol, Cardiff and Hull because they are our next four games. Whilst Forest will be tricky, I don’t think the other three are that tricky at all and thus losing all four would be a shocking set of resultsmuirinho wrote:What I meant was - they are all very losable games on paper. So, IMO it wouldn't be a shocking indictment of Bowen & the team if we did lose all 4 of them. But if we win one & draw a couple, it's a good sign.Snowflake Royal wrote: Could we?
We've lost 4 games under Bowen, max 2 in a row and we've gone no more than 3 without winning.
It’s the week after that run I’m concerned about, West Brom, Leeds and Sheffield Wednesday
by URZZZZ » 20 Jan 2020 15:53
20 Jan 2020 15:53Sorry, presumed you were talking about league games onlymuirinho wrote:All opinions isn't it? I think Cardiff is losable because Bowen will probably play the U23s, and I'd be more worried about Bristol and Forest than about Wednesday or Leeds.URZZZZ wrote:I’m assuming you’re talking about Forest, Bristol, Cardiff and Hull because they are our next four games. Whilst Forest will be tricky, I don’t think the other three are that tricky at all and thus losing all four would be a shocking set of resultsmuirinho wrote:
What I meant was - they are all very losable games on paper. So, IMO it wouldn't be a shocking indictment of Bowen & the team if we did lose all 4 of them. But if we win one & draw a couple, it's a good sign.
It’s the week after that run I’m concerned about, West Brom, Leeds and Sheffield Wednesday
Hull, yeah, I was mentally including Millwall in my four, even though we'd already played it!
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Humpty Jumpshoes and 224 guests