NathStPaul wrote:Harsh, Ian is alright.Brogue wrote:Moore on

NathStPaul wrote:Harsh, Ian is alright.Brogue wrote:Moore on

Agree with all of this.fred sharpes nose wrote:We watch the same match - we see a different game
Enjoyed the game, thought we held our own against a better team. Sheffield didn't deserve to lose, we didn't deserve to win. Reckon their manager would've been ok with a point. Got the impression our guys didn't want to be shown up by the oppostion who put some nice moves together as did we on occassion.
Was great to see them play wide men on both sides hugging the touchline stretching the space - we seem so narrow in comparison
We were talking throughout the game about subs and couldn't really see anyone having a stinker and deserved hooking.
Inces subs - made us less effective. Thought Long and Carroll were linking up well sometimes, Long lots of energy chasing and movement. NGW doing fine ditto McIntrye and Hendrick given their limitiations. PInce as usual full of buzzing. Don't know why Long went off ditto NGW. Was pretty obvious after the goal we needed to do something so bring Azeez on left side but a bit late IMO. Thought Yiadom was struggling - most of time high up the pitch (he is a right back with occassional foray forward) with Holmes not looking totally happy at almost right back. NGW and Azezz could be a good partnership on the left. Square pegs square holes - Yiaddom to RB Holmes to centre and hook one of Sarr or Dann - Sarr for me as he seemed laboured. Think that's what all that was needed. But then we all want to be the manager but we are not.
So he brings on Joao for Long - made absolutley zero impact - didnt know what to do and where to be. Him and Carroll are basically playing in the same part of the pitch. The usual lazy Joao performance - he clearly does not want to be here (or under Ince?). Taking NGW off madness - he was a threat going forward.
Last two subs - Casadei and Moore totally pointless - booing of Moore realy crass.
An interesting challenge for the stattos or Tim Dellor - analyse the effectiveness of Inces substituions and timing thereof.
Ince to the end of the season - keep us up, nice bonus and thank you. Ince Out in the summer
We played quite a few balls down the channel for Long last night, can think of at least 3 occasions where we did that with at least 1 nearly putting it on a plate for AC before a defender managed to nick it away, and I only saw the second half.72 bus wrote:We have Andy Carroll but never get a cross in from wide, we have Shane Long but never play a direct ball along the ground into the channels for him to run the defender.fred sharpes nose wrote:We watch the same match - we see a different game
Was great to see them play wide men on both sides hugging the touchline stretching the space - we seem so narrow in comparison
Clueless and you can see better organisation and football intelligence most Sunday mornings anywhere around the Reading area.
That's how bad last night was.
Agree with a fair bit of that although in theory, the Joao sub made sense. Where Long had a good game was running the channels, running in behind etc but as the game progressed, he became more tired and Sheffield dropped deeper. Both factors reducing his effectiveness. Joao is a better player in between the lines in congested spaces but he ended up doing very little (as has been the case most the season)fred sharpes nose wrote:We watch the same match - we see a different game
Enjoyed the game, thought we held our own against a better team. Sheffield didn't deserve to lose, we didn't deserve to win. Reckon their manager would've been ok with a point. Got the impression our guys didn't want to be shown up by the oppostion who put some nice moves together as did we on occassion.
Was great to see them play wide men on both sides hugging the touchline stretching the space - we seem so narrow in comparison
We were talking throughout the game about subs and couldn't really see anyone having a stinker and deserved hooking.
Inces subs - made us less effective. Thought Long and Carroll were linking up well sometimes, Long lots of energy chasing and movement. NGW doing fine ditto McIntrye and Hendrick given their limitiations. PInce as usual full of buzzing. Don't know why Long went off ditto NGW. Was pretty obvious after the goal we needed to do something so bring Azeez on left side but a bit late IMO. Thought Yiadom was struggling - most of time high up the pitch (he is a right back with occassional foray forward) with Holmes not looking totally happy at almost right back. NGW and Azezz could be a good partnership on the left. Square pegs square holes - Yiaddom to RB Holmes to centre and hook one of Sarr or Dann - Sarr for me as he seemed laboured. Think that's what all that was needed. But then we all want to be the manager but we are not.
So he brings on Joao for Long - made absolutley zero impact - didnt know what to do and where to be. Him and Carroll are basically playing in the same part of the pitch. The usual lazy Joao performance - he clearly does not want to be here (or under Ince?). Taking NGW off madness - he was a threat going forward.
Last two subs - Casadei and Moore totally pointless - booing of Moore realy crass.
An interesting challenge for the stattos or Tim Dellor - analyse the effectiveness of Inces substituions and timing thereof.
Ince to the end of the season - keep us up, nice bonus and thank you. Ince Out in the summer
So three balls down the channels and one cross which was from AC who was out of position as usual.Stranded wrote:We played quite a few balls down the channel for Long last night, can think of at least 3 occasions where we did that with at least 1 nearly putting it on a plate for AC before a defender managed to nick it away, and I only saw the second half.72 bus wrote:We have Andy Carroll but never get a cross in from wide, we have Shane Long but never play a direct ball along the ground into the channels for him to run the defender.fred sharpes nose wrote:We watch the same match - we see a different game
Was great to see them play wide men on both sides hugging the touchline stretching the space - we seem so narrow in comparison
Clueless and you can see better organisation and football intelligence most Sunday mornings anywhere around the Reading area.
That's how bad last night was.
As for crossing, there was one absolute beauty in the second half where Yiadom just mistimed his leap else would have likely at least scored - was screaming out for AC to be attacking it, unfortunately, it was his cross. We do need to get more crosses in as AC forced the keeper into a decent save from about the only cross in to him from open play.
Apparently not, as we put in 23 crosses and 'favoured crossing the ball' according to stat sites.72 bus wrote:So three balls down the channels and one cross which was from AC who was out of position as usual.Stranded wrote:We played quite a few balls down the channel for Long last night, can think of at least 3 occasions where we did that with at least 1 nearly putting it on a plate for AC before a defender managed to nick it away, and I only saw the second half.72 bus wrote:
We have Andy Carroll but never get a cross in from wide, we have Shane Long but never play a direct ball along the ground into the channels for him to run the defender.
Clueless and you can see better organisation and football intelligence most Sunday mornings anywhere around the Reading area.
That's how bad last night was.
As for crossing, there was one absolute beauty in the second half where Yiadom just mistimed his leap else would have likely at least scored - was screaming out for AC to be attacking it, unfortunately, it was his cross. We do need to get more crosses in as AC forced the keeper into a decent save from about the only cross in to him from open play.
You only saw the second half on TV ?
You really need to be there to witness how poor we are.
Apparently not, as we put in 23 crosses and 'favoured crossing the ball' according to stat sites.72 bus wrote:So three balls down the channels and one cross which was from AC who was out of position as usual.Stranded wrote:We played quite a few balls down the channel for Long last night, can think of at least 3 occasions where we did that with at least 1 nearly putting it on a plate for AC before a defender managed to nick it away, and I only saw the second half.72 bus wrote:
We have Andy Carroll but never get a cross in from wide, we have Shane Long but never play a direct ball along the ground into the channels for him to run the defender.
Clueless and you can see better organisation and football intelligence most Sunday mornings anywhere around the Reading area.
That's how bad last night was.
As for crossing, there was one absolute beauty in the second half where Yiadom just mistimed his leap else would have likely at least scored - was screaming out for AC to be attacking it, unfortunately, it was his cross. We do need to get more crosses in as AC forced the keeper into a decent save from about the only cross in to him from open play.
You only saw the second half on TV ?
You really need to be there to witness how poor we are.
Yes quality needs to improve, and strikers need to be in the right places.Hound wrote:Our best chances came from crosses. We did put a fair few in, but again the quality wasn’t always there
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 691 guests