Close to 100% of the debs of the club are to Dai Yong.Elm Park Kid wrote:He can only liquidate the club if he pays back all debts 100%. Otherwise he has a legal obligation to sell the club.Greatwesternline wrote:You understand Dai Young can liquidate us if he wants? As the owner of the company that entirely his right.Elm Park Kid wrote:
It won't get liquidated, it will get put into administration. Which means it gets sold.
The longer this continues, the more leagues we drop, players/assets we sell and reputational damage, the more chance there is that no one wants to buy us. That's the fear. We have to accept the pain now for the sake of future Reading fans. I rather us go out fighting than fade into nothing.
It's so dangerous having 1000 uninformed RFC fans doing protests labouring under the misapprehension that somehow they can bring about administration against the will of the clubs biggest creditor, Dai Young.. He can just shut up shop if he can't be bothered.
If you want the club to go into administration protest outside Compass Catering until they petition for the clubs administration for unpaid debts.
Well that isn't how football works so they won't be.Sutekh wrote:Vale fans online saying they should be awarded the points and a 3-0 win.
Shut up you nonce. I bet you didn't even goSnowflake Royal wrote:Can't say I agree, but well done on the peaceful manner. And credit to the Vale fans.
Fair enough and don’t disagreeSutekh wrote:Vale fans online saying they should be awarded the points and a 3-0 win.
No.Elm Park Kid wrote:You don't think that if Dai/Pang face the threat of the club being expelled from the EFL that wouldn't make them more likely to accept offers?Sutekh wrote:It's NOT suddenly going to persuade a man in China to accept offers that he may have had in front of him for months as he doesn't care enough any more. Equally it's not going to persuade prospective buyers to suddenly make worthwhile offers for the club either.WestYorksRoyal wrote: By persuading Dai to accept offers. Agree it's a complicated, difficult situation. It all comes back to Dai and his cronies for creating this dilemma.
Some numpty rang into BBCFM to say they wanted the FL to change their rules so owners like this couldn't get control of clubs
Club can't even afford to put the the floodlights on
Don't really give a shit what happens to the points tbh, or Vale fans.Hound wrote:Fair enough and don’t disagreeSutekh wrote:Vale fans online saying they should be awarded the points and a 3-0 win.
You've worked out after about five years that I'm watching games online?Royal_jimmy wrote:Shut up you nonce. I bet you didn't even goSnowflake Royal wrote:Can't say I agree, but well done on the peaceful manner. And credit to the Vale fans.
Yep, that would be fair.Hound wrote:Fair enough and don’t disagreeSutekh wrote:Vale fans online saying they should be awarded the points and a 3-0 win.
How did they decide on the score line?Sutekh wrote:Vale fans online saying they should be awarded the points and a 3-0 win.
Standard result for unplayed/abandoned/postponed games I believe.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:How did they decide on the score line?Sutekh wrote:Vale fans online saying they should be awarded the points and a 3-0 win.
FA websiteNathStPaul wrote:Well that isn't how football works so they won't be.Sutekh wrote:Vale fans online saying they should be awarded the points and a 3-0 win.
Oh Nath.Greatwesternline wrote:FA websiteNathStPaul wrote:Well that isn't how football works so they won't be.Sutekh wrote:Vale fans online saying they should be awarded the points and a 3-0 win.
. In all cases where the Management Committee are satisfied that a Match was abandoned owing to the conduct of one Team or its Club member(s) they shall award the points for the Match to
the opponent.
It's how it works according to the FA
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Doc, Google [Bot] and 306 guests