TBF this is Scottish level football so he might have a bit more success.Sutekh wrote:Postecoglu is now available.
TBF this is Scottish level football so he might have a bit more success.Sutekh wrote:Postecoglu is now available.
Anything is better than Noel Hunt right nowAscotexgunner wrote:TBF this is Scottish level football so he might have a bit more success.Sutekh wrote:Postecoglu is now available.
I think this is the crux of the matter. This club is being run as a business now, meaning relegation is an unmitigated disaster for those putting their money in. They will want to be in the Championship within 3 years.Ascotexgunner wrote:And that's just it. No matter how well we play we aren't getting the results. And it's yet another disappointing away result. The investors in the club will only be interested in results, and when you look at the table tonight it ain't pretty after 12games.. I thought Noel might be gone Monday but lose or possibly draw Tuesday and I'm convinced he will be.leon wrote:what happens if we play as we have the rest of the games?Snowflake Royal wrote: Create this many chances every week and we'll win at least 3-2.
We are nothing like Madejski's club though we actually have some good playersWestYorksRoyal wrote:I think this is the crux of the matter. This club is being run as a business now, meaning relegation is an unmitigated disaster for those putting their money in. They will want to be in the Championship within 3 years.Ascotexgunner wrote:And that's just it. No matter how well we play we aren't getting the results. And it's yet another disappointing away result. The investors in the club will only be interested in results, and when you look at the table tonight it ain't pretty after 12games.. I thought Noel might be gone Monday but lose or possibly draw Tuesday and I'm convinced he will be.leon wrote:
what happens if we play as we have the rest of the games?
You can look at a good performance today, but you can't sugarcoat our league position after 12 games, especially when it's a good squad which an experienced manager could probably turn around pretty quickly. Hunt won't survive if he doesn't get minimum 4 points from the next 2. Wouldn't shock me if he's finished already.
Big similarities with Selles 2 years ago. But we had no hierarchy who would sack him, and no manager would have come to us in the state we were in. He got another chance he didn't deserve and, fair play, he turned it around. But the club situation gave him protection that Hunt doesn't have.
Yeah same. All on the next 2 games really. Win and we'll look so much more comfortable. Lose and it looks really badleon wrote:I agree with everything here.WestYorksRoyal wrote:But we created chances today and missed them. We weren't under constant pressure but still conceded twice. A team playing well and finding ways to lose is still a relegation candidate. The next 2 are at home against weaker opponents, so if we can keep up the performance from today we can win them, hopefully get a bit of confidence and find the composure to go with it. But if we can't time is up for Hunt.Snowflake Royal wrote: Create this many chances every week and we'll win at least 3-2.
Plus, it's not like we've been playing well. Today probably the best performance of the season. Wouldn't be surprised if we look nervous and lacklustre on Tuesday.
I suspect Hunt has bought himself another game or two with the performance but suspect lose on Tuesday (or even draw) and he’ll be doneJohn Madejski's Wallet wrote:Yeah same. All on the next 2 games really. Win and we'll look so much more comfortable. Lose and it looks really badleon wrote:I agree with everything here.WestYorksRoyal wrote: But we created chances today and missed them. We weren't under constant pressure but still conceded twice. A team playing well and finding ways to lose is still a relegation candidate. The next 2 are at home against weaker opponents, so if we can keep up the performance from today we can win them, hopefully get a bit of confidence and find the composure to go with it. But if we can't time is up for Hunt.
Plus, it's not like we've been playing well. Today probably the best performance of the season. Wouldn't be surprised if we look nervous and lacklustre on Tuesday.
I did think we played quite well in it but we deserved to lose.Hound wrote:I’m a bit in two minds. Caveat I missed the second half but first half was the best we’ve played this season
Not sure if it suggests we will keep playing like that and get results or whether we can play well and still not win games
Certainly signs of improvement today (for the first time imo) but being 2 points off bottom and 22nd place at this stage is utterly unacceptable along with some awful performances along the way
I don’t think Hunt could argue if he got the sack now but if he doesn’t we absolutely must get results in the next couple of games - 4 points min
We didn't miss them, we came up against a keeper in great form, there's a differenceWestYorksRoyal wrote:But we created chances today and missed them. We weren't under constant pressure but still conceded twice. A team playing well and finding ways to lose is still a relegation candidate. The next 2 are at home against weaker opponents, so if we can keep up the performance from today we can win them, hopefully get a bit of confidence and find the composure to go with it. But if we can't time is up for Hunt.Snowflake Royal wrote:Create this many chances every week and we'll win at least 3-2.WestYorksRoyal wrote: Not if we concede 2 soft goals every week.
Plus, it's not like we've been playing well. Today probably the best performance of the season. Wouldn't be surprised if we look nervous and lacklustre on Tuesday.
Don’t just get him out the team, terminate his contract for match fixing. THREE sitters missed - is this guy really that shit, or is he missing them deliberately?WestYorksRoyal wrote:Get Lane out of the team, for everyone's good including his.
Bar missing the goals (good save, not ideal for a left footer, and great block), I thought Lane was, similar to most of the team, quite a lot better against Cardiff than in recent games.Extended-Phenotype wrote:Don’t just get him out the team, terminate his contract for match fixing. THREE sitters missed - is this guy really that shit, or is he missing them deliberately?WestYorksRoyal wrote:Get Lane out of the team, for everyone's good including his.
Absolute toilet player.
Mate, my nan could have scored that and she plays in League 2.Snowflake Royal wrote:Bar missing the goals (good save, not ideal for a left footer, and great block), I thought Lane was, similar to most of the team, quite a lot better against Cardiff than in recent games.Extended-Phenotype wrote:Don’t just get him out the team, terminate his contract for match fixing. THREE sitters missed - is this guy really that shit, or is he missing them deliberately?WestYorksRoyal wrote:Get Lane out of the team, for everyone's good including his.
Absolute toilet player.
If I was to compile a list of players who aren't good enough to start based on Cardiff, it would be Doyle, Stevens and Burns in the top 3.
Burns having been poor most of the season. He's just so bloody awkward and slow. CB order of preference for me is Williams, O'Connor, Dorsett, Yiadom, Burns, Stickland.
I'd be interested to see Kyerewaa, Ehibhatiomhan or even Ritchie start in the 10 over Doyle at the moment. Him and Elliott have been disappointing amidst the little flashes of technical ability they've shown.
If you were talking about the o e in the last game, I could have scored that.Extended-Phenotype wrote:Mate, my nan could have scored that and she plays in League 2.Snowflake Royal wrote:Bar missing the goals (good save, not ideal for a left footer, and great block), I thought Lane was, similar to most of the team, quite a lot better against Cardiff than in recent games.Extended-Phenotype wrote:
Don’t just get him out the team, terminate his contract for match fixing. THREE sitters missed - is this guy really that shit, or is he missing them deliberately?
Absolute toilet player.
If I was to compile a list of players who aren't good enough to start based on Cardiff, it would be Doyle, Stevens and Burns in the top 3.
Burns having been poor most of the season. He's just so bloody awkward and slow. CB order of preference for me is Williams, O'Connor, Dorsett, Yiadom, Burns, Stickland.
I'd be interested to see Kyerewaa, Ehibhatiomhan or even Ritchie start in the 10 over Doyle at the moment. Him and Elliott have been disappointing amidst the little flashes of technical ability they've shown.
Doyle is just such a nothing footballer. Stick Wing in the hole, and stick Savage and Elliott behind him.
Well, thank oxf*rd he missed an even easier sitter the other week to make missing this one look acceptable by comparison!Snowflake Royal wrote:If you were talking about the o e in the last game, I could have scored that.Extended-Phenotype wrote:Mate, my nan could have scored that and she plays in League 2.Snowflake Royal wrote: Bar missing the goals (good save, not ideal for a left footer, and great block), I thought Lane was, similar to most of the team, quite a lot better against Cardiff than in recent games.
If I was to compile a list of players who aren't good enough to start based on Cardiff, it would be Doyle, Stevens and Burns in the top 3.
Burns having been poor most of the season. He's just so bloody awkward and slow. CB order of preference for me is Williams, O'Connor, Dorsett, Yiadom, Burns, Stickland.
I'd be interested to see Kyerewaa, Ehibhatiomhan or even Ritchie start in the 10 over Doyle at the moment. Him and Elliott have been disappointing amidst the little flashes of technical ability they've shown.
Doyle is just such a nothing footballer. Stick Wing in the hole, and stick Savage and Elliott behind him.
The first one against Cardiff, keeper is spread well, there's a route round him to the right post for the right footer that isn't really on for the left footer, and going the other side of the keeper is harder from where he is. Should have done better, but its not glaring like the other week.
On a sample of one game. Cardiff may just have had an off dayMr Angry wrote:Obviously we are going to have to start converting those chances in order to win games, but as most people before the game were expecting an easy Cardiff win (which this wasn't) maybe they should try to park their confirmation bias for 5 minutes and acknowledge that the team is getting better, they are creating more chances and it would be genuinely surprising t we didn't finish up mid-table.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks like this. I am sick of seeing his name on the team sheet knowing if he gets a chance, he's just going to miss.Extended-Phenotype wrote:Don’t just get him out the team, terminate his contract for match fixing. THREE sitters missed - is this guy really that shit, or is he missing them deliberately?WestYorksRoyal wrote:Get Lane out of the team, for everyone's good including his.
Absolute toilet player.
Doyle looks tidy, and the sort of player who should be good. But whathe actually done?BarryWhiteRFC wrote:I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks like this. I am sick of seeing his name on the team sheet knowing if he gets a chance, he's just going to miss.Extended-Phenotype wrote:Don’t just get him out the team, terminate his contract for match fixing. THREE sitters missed - is this guy really that shit, or is he missing them deliberately?WestYorksRoyal wrote:Get Lane out of the team, for everyone's good including his.
Absolute toilet player.
I know people will say you need to give him some credit for getting there and being in those positions, but, for me, he gives the ball away too much as well as missing the sitters. So for that reason, I'm out. Start anyone in his place.
However, I quite like Doyle, maybe I am missing something. I'll pay more attention to him in the next game.
Users browsing this forum: 78royal, Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 887 guests