Despite our overall better results I don't think our defence has improved really. Abbey and Bindon are raw. Dorsett looks ok but not confident in a LB role, Holmes is still iffy. I'd like an experienced CB who's better than Harlee Dean!yuomi wrote:Still at a loss to explain how bad our defending can be and, given how long it's been and how obvious the issues are, how nothing successive coaching teams have tried has had the slightest positive effect.
The problem today was largely in our inability to compete in midfield. And Holmes was immense in defence.Royal_jimmy wrote:Despite our overall better results I don't think our defence has improved really. Abbey and Bindon are raw. Dorsett looks ok but not confident in a LB role, Holmes is still iffy. I'd like an experienced CB who's better than Harlee Dean!yuomi wrote:Still at a loss to explain how bad our defending can be and, given how long it's been and how obvious the issues are, how nothing successive coaching teams have tried has had the slightest positive effect.
Agree the midfield went completely awol first half, forgot Craig was playing. Also thought Holmes was excellent. Full backs both hopeless, neither give me any confidence and just allow endless crosses. Tactics were also weird, just giving the ball away all the time by hoofing. All very strange and take a point all day long after that shit show.Snowflake Royal wrote:The problem today was largely in our inability to compete in midfield. And Holmes was immense in defence.Royal_jimmy wrote:Despite our overall better results I don't think our defence has improved really. Abbey and Bindon are raw. Dorsett looks ok but not confident in a LB role, Holmes is still iffy. I'd like an experienced CB who's better than Harlee Dean!yuomi wrote:Still at a loss to explain how bad our defending can be and, given how long it's been and how obvious the issues are, how nothing successive coaching teams have tried has had the slightest positive effect.
Our midfield issues means the defence often get little to no screening, and everything is a scrabble. It's been much better with Craig in there, though not today. And even with our better results recently our passing and ball retention has been dreadful.
I thought Holmes was magnificent last night. He's getting back to his best, and reaching similar form to Aziz!Royal_jimmy wrote:Despite our overall better results I don't think our defence has improved really. Abbey and Bindon are raw. Dorsett looks ok but not confident in a LB role, Holmes is still iffy. I'd like an experienced CB who's better than Harlee Dean!yuomi wrote:Still at a loss to explain how bad our defending can be and, given how long it's been and how obvious the issues are, how nothing successive coaching teams have tried has had the slightest positive effect.
I don’t think many midfields would have coped with Sercombe, Thompson and Pett last night. Tom Pett, in particular, was imperious. He absolutely ran the show from beginning to end. He was (unfathomably) available as a free agent and Darrell Clarke brought him in immediately when he was appointed. He’s up there with the best midfielders in L1 at the moment.Bristol Paul wrote:Agree the midfield went completely awol first half, forgot Craig was playing. Also thought Holmes was excellent. Full backs both hopeless, neither give me any confidence and just allow endless crosses. Tactics were also weird, just giving the ball away all the time by hoofing. All very strange and take a point all day long after that shit show.Snowflake Royal wrote:The problem today was largely in our inability to compete in midfield. And Holmes was immense in defence.Royal_jimmy wrote:
Despite our overall better results I don't think our defence has improved really. Abbey and Bindon are raw. Dorsett looks ok but not confident in a LB role, Holmes is still iffy. I'd like an experienced CB who's better than Harlee Dean!
Our midfield issues means the defence often get little to no screening, and everything is a scrabble. It's been much better with Craig in there, though not today. And even with our better results recently our passing and ball retention has been dreadful.
Yeah, Pett was superb.Jerry St Clair wrote:I don’t think many midfields would have coped with Sercombe, Thompson and Pett last night. Tom Pett, in particular, was imperious. He absolutely ran the show from beginning to end. He was (unfathomably) available as a free agent and Darrell Clarke brought him in immediately when he was appointed. He’s up there with the best midfielders in L1 at the moment.Bristol Paul wrote:Agree the midfield went completely awol first half, forgot Craig was playing. Also thought Holmes was excellent. Full backs both hopeless, neither give me any confidence and just allow endless crosses. Tactics were also weird, just giving the ball away all the time by hoofing. All very strange and take a point all day long after that shit show.Snowflake Royal wrote: The problem today was largely in our inability to compete in midfield. And Holmes was immense in defence.
Our midfield issues means the defence often get little to no screening, and everything is a scrabble. It's been much better with Craig in there, though not today. And even with our better results recently our passing and ball retention has been dreadful.
Yes, they were excellent. But my god they were fragile at the back.WestYorksRoyal wrote:I actually think Cheltenham were one of the better teams we faced this season. How many shit teams have we lost to this season, where we've gifted points? By contrast, they had a clear, effective gameplan which we struggled to cope with.
Much better than the likes of Shrewsbury, Orient and Exeter who have beaten us. Even Charlton were pretty average for most of the game when they beat us 4-0; I'd say Cheltenham were better.
A team like Charlton who can put in a mediocre performance and win will always finish above a team who perform well but throw away a 2 goal lead. This season is teaching me that actually performances are not everything. "Trust the process and results will follow". Bollocks. Take your chances and don't concede silly goals. Once you have that foundation then performances take you to the next level.Snowflake Royal wrote:Yes, they were excellent. But my god they were fragile at the back.WestYorksRoyal wrote:I actually think Cheltenham were one of the better teams we faced this season. How many shit teams have we lost to this season, where we've gifted points? By contrast, they had a clear, effective gameplan which we struggled to cope with.
Much better than the likes of Shrewsbury, Orient and Exeter who have beaten us. Even Charlton were pretty average for most of the game when they beat us 4-0; I'd say Cheltenham were better.
I could see other teams with some passing ability beating their press and getting joy galore against their defence.
^^ ThisOLLIE KEARNS wrote:Lastly, I’m thoroughly enjoying league 1. Lots of action, errors (many of which are hilarious), application and goals.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bazzaballs, Carlos, Downside, Google [Bot], Larry_Parnell and 91 guests