They had 2 shots on target. 2 reasonable chances other than the goal at a push. How is that dominating?leon wrote:Nah. We let a Rotherham dominate us for 75% of the match. At home. Absolutely disgraceful performance with no character or spine.URZZZZZZZZ wrote:The usual knee jerk nonsense in here I see.
First half they could have had 2 and all second half we barely touched the ball. When they scored was it a surprise? No.Hound wrote:They had 2 shots on target. 2 reasonable chances other than the goal at a push. How is that dominating?leon wrote:Nah. We let a Rotherham dominate us for 75% of the match. At home. Absolutely disgraceful performance with no character or spine.URZZZZZZZZ wrote:The usual knee jerk nonsense in here I see.
It was a surprise considering they hadn’t had a shot on goal all halfleon wrote:First half they could have had 2 and all second half we barely touched the ball. When they scored was it a surprise? No.Hound wrote:They had 2 shots on target. 2 reasonable chances other than the goal at a push. How is that dominating?leon wrote:
Nah. We let a Rotherham dominate us for 75% of the match. At home. Absolutely disgraceful performance with no character or spine.
Dominated.
In what was is it knee jerk? We are at the business end of the season playing a crappy team in opposition who had a pair of fullbacks who were the worst I have seen at this level and we spent the entire second half sitting deep hoping to hold onto a one goal lead. It was pathetic.URZZZZZZZZ wrote:The usual knee jerk nonsense in here I see.
Rotherham were the better team in that period of the game. We were dire.Zip wrote:we spent the entire second half sitting deep hoping to hold onto a one goal lead. It was pathetic.
Yes, that was simply one of the best goals I have ever seen RFC score in 50 years. Won the ball out wide on half way, play it all around to feet including back to Martinez under pressure, pass it through the middle, out wide, beat the man, cut back, goal. Great stuff.notloyalenuffroyal wrote:So weird...
I saw it quite differently.
The goal was a thing of beauty and one of the best I have ever seen from a Reading side.
Goal we conceded. Three on one break. Simple pass out wide was all that was required. Lose the ball. We are carved wide open.......... Goal.Dick Habbin's hairdo wrote: Yes, that was simply one of the best goals I have ever seen RFC score in 50 years. Won the ball out wide on half way, play it all around to feet including back to Martinez under pressure, pass it through the middle, out wide, beat the man, cut back, goal. Great stuff.
Meite was in the team for Rotherham set pieces and throw in's. Rotherham only have one very predictable style of football. Barrow would have been a huge gamble.CavershamRoyal wrote:Personally would have gone Barrow for Meite a bit earlier.
Rubbish. A load of long throws does not equal domination.leon wrote:First half they could have had 2 and all second half we barely touched the ball. When they scored was it a surprise? No.Hound wrote:They had 2 shots on target. 2 reasonable chances other than the goal at a push. How is that dominating?leon wrote:
Nah. We let a Rotherham dominate us for 75% of the match. At home. Absolutely disgraceful performance with no character or spine.
Dominated.
Who was missing?Born Again Royalist wrote:You omly have to look at the bench today to see negativity on selection 4 of them were defensive, Gunter, O shea, Mc Shane plus keeper. This was a game we had to Win not defend
Midfielders.Lower West wrote:Who was missing?Born Again Royalist wrote:You omly have to look at the bench today to see negativity on selection 4 of them were defensive, Gunter, O shea, Mc Shane plus keeper. This was a game we had to Win not defend
Hear hear!URZZZZZZZZ wrote:The usual knee jerk nonsense in here I see.