by Sutekh » 12 Dec 2020 14:23
12 Dec 2020 14:23by Jackson Corner » 12 Dec 2020 14:25
12 Dec 2020 14:25by CountryRoyal » 12 Dec 2020 14:28
12 Dec 2020 14:28by Mid Sussex Royal » 12 Dec 2020 14:29
12 Dec 2020 14:29Its the same starting 11 we had V Bournemouth except Baldock for Joao. Did ok in the first half...Zip wrote:Would take a draw. That’s the weakest starting line up in a long time. Injuries could kill our season in the next few weeks.
by andrew1957 » 12 Dec 2020 14:36
12 Dec 2020 14:36Agree - all I can think is that Pauno thinks Esteves will offer more going forwards but it is very hard to be optimistic that we will get anything from this game. I suppose if we do by some miracle get the lead he could bring on Holmes to shore things up at the back. Can only see a QPR win today.CountryRoyal wrote:I can almost understand Olise on the bench, in case we need to change the game from the bench but Esteves over Holmes makes zero sense. Let’s be real with that front line we’re unlikely to take a lead which we will have to protect and even though Holmes had wobbled a bit of late, he is VASTLY better defensively.
by URZZZZ » 12 Dec 2020 14:40
12 Dec 2020 14:40It’s a difficult one because Esteves has made quite a few mistakes leading to goals but I don’t particularly like seeing Holmes at RB, he’s too cautious (understandably so) and it’s a real momentum killer when he’s on the ballCountryRoyal wrote:I can almost understand Olise on the bench, in case we need to change the game from the bench but Esteves over Holmes makes zero sense. Let’s be real with that front line we’re unlikely to take a lead which we will have to protect and even though Holmes had wobbled a bit of late, he is VASTLY better defensively.
by CountryRoyal » 12 Dec 2020 14:41
12 Dec 2020 14:41But on the flip side Esteves has also offered oxf*rd all as an attacking threat.URZZZZ wrote:It’s a difficult one because Esteves has made quite a few mistakes leading to goals but I don’t particularly like seeing Holmes at RB, he’s too cautious (understandably so) and it’s a real momentum killer when he’s on the ballCountryRoyal wrote:I can almost understand Olise on the bench, in case we need to change the game from the bench but Esteves over Holmes makes zero sense. Let’s be real with that front line we’re unlikely to take a lead which we will have to protect and even though Holmes had wobbled a bit of late, he is VASTLY better defensively.
by URZZZZ » 12 Dec 2020 14:42
12 Dec 2020 14:42Doesn’t look too great but I prefer the squad size this season to last years which had too many playerswindermereROYAL wrote:That bench
by URZZZZ » 12 Dec 2020 14:43
12 Dec 2020 14:43I don’t disagree but he at least looks natural there and might move the ball on at a quicker tempoCountryRoyal wrote:But on the flip side Esteves has also offered oxf*rd all as an attacking threat.URZZZZ wrote:It’s a difficult one because Esteves has made quite a few mistakes leading to goals but I don’t particularly like seeing Holmes at RB, he’s too cautious (understandably so) and it’s a real momentum killer when he’s on the ballCountryRoyal wrote:I can almost understand Olise on the bench, in case we need to change the game from the bench but Esteves over Holmes makes zero sense. Let’s be real with that front line we’re unlikely to take a lead which we will have to protect and even though Holmes had wobbled a bit of late, he is VASTLY better defensively.
by CountryRoyal » 12 Dec 2020 14:45
12 Dec 2020 14:45But if we’re going for a more attacking threat from the start why not start our most creative player?URZZZZ wrote:I don’t disagree but he at least looks natural there and might move the ball on at a quicker tempoCountryRoyal wrote:But on the flip side Esteves has also offered oxf*rd all as an attacking threat.URZZZZ wrote:
It’s a difficult one because Esteves has made quite a few mistakes leading to goals but I don’t particularly like seeing Holmes at RB, he’s too cautious (understandably so) and it’s a real momentum killer when he’s on the ball
Personally feel bringing in Esteves was just about right but would switch him for Holmes against Norwich. Need Yiadom or Araruna back soon
by South Coast Royal » 12 Dec 2020 14:48
12 Dec 2020 14:48by SCIAG » 12 Dec 2020 14:49
12 Dec 2020 14:49by CountryRoyal » 12 Dec 2020 14:50
12 Dec 2020 14:50I mean I’m not sure what the question was but whatever it was, Melvin-Lambert wasn’t the answerSCIAG wrote:Melvin-Lambert played 90 minutes last night, if Baldock has to go off then we’re in trouble. Aluko has played centre forward before I guess.
by JR » 12 Dec 2020 14:55
12 Dec 2020 14:55by boycey » 12 Dec 2020 14:57
12 Dec 2020 14:57by Snowflake Royal » 12 Dec 2020 14:57
12 Dec 2020 14:57Why be a twat about a youth player you've barely ever seen?CountryRoyal wrote:I mean I’m not sure what the question was but whatever it was, Melvin-Lambert wasn’t the answerSCIAG wrote:Melvin-Lambert played 90 minutes last night, if Baldock has to go off then we’re in trouble. Aluko has played centre forward before I guess.
by Millsy » 12 Dec 2020 14:59
12 Dec 2020 14:59by Snowflake Royal » 12 Dec 2020 15:00
12 Dec 2020 15:00by higher » 12 Dec 2020 15:01
12 Dec 2020 15:01by CountryRoyal » 12 Dec 2020 15:02
12 Dec 2020 15:02Sorry I forgot he’s the second coming. Don’t let your gripe with me get in the way of reality you fcuking helm.Snowflake Royal wrote:Why be a twat about a youth player you've barely ever seen?CountryRoyal wrote:I mean I’m not sure what the question was but whatever it was, Melvin-Lambert wasn’t the answerSCIAG wrote:Melvin-Lambert played 90 minutes last night, if Baldock has to go off then we’re in trouble. Aluko has played centre forward before I guess.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 66 guests