We can only assume they are saying that forecasting this seasons accounts means we would still fail the 3 year cycle of FFP.Snowflake Royal wrote:It's an absolute nonsense.
Those accounts are for last season when Barnsley finished above us.
YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:We can only assume they are saying that forecasting this seasons accounts means we would still fail the 3 year cycle of FFP.Snowflake Royal wrote:It's an absolute nonsense.
Those accounts are for last season when Barnsley finished above us.
But again, I don't know what they are practically trying to base this off because we've agreed a business plan with the EFL and I'm sure most, if not all, clubs who failed FFP regulations in recent years, would also fail the year after as well because I can't imagine it's that easy to simply cut your costs within a season without selling the vast majority of your squad.
Said it a few times but, most clubs in this division do not have sustainable P&S models. Teams with parachute payments, for example, do not have a long-term sustainable P&S model for the Championship.
I have no idea how they would know what the forecast is yet as I don't believe it is due until the end of the month. If we lose more than 13m this year with increased turnover and a lower wage bill we deserve the other 6 points but under the agreed decision that cannot be applied until next season I believe.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:We can only assume they are saying that forecasting this seasons accounts means we would still fail the 3 year cycle of FFP.Snowflake Royal wrote:It's an absolute nonsense.
Those accounts are for last season when Barnsley finished above us.
But again, I don't know what they are practically trying to base this off because we've agreed a business plan with the EFL and I'm sure most, if not all, clubs who failed FFP regulations in recent years, would also fail the year after as well because I can't imagine it's that easy to simply cut your costs within a season without selling the vast majority of your squad.
Said it a few times but, most clubs in this division do not have sustainable P&S models. Teams with parachute payments, for example, do not have a long-term sustainable P&S model for the Championship.
It depends on what they know, or what they believe they know. I don't know how they would know it, but there may be some information that they can gather, or predict. They'll have looked at our sales, incomings, outgoings etc and probably predicted that we will still be over. Again, to whatever level of accuracy would be scrutinised of course, but from their perspective, it could be worth a claim.Stranded wrote:I have no idea how they would know what the forecast is yet as I don't believe it is due until the end of the month. If we lose more than 13m this year with increased turnover and a lower wage bill we deserve the other 6 points but under the agreed decision that cannot be applied until next season I believe.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:We can only assume they are saying that forecasting this seasons accounts means we would still fail the 3 year cycle of FFP.Snowflake Royal wrote:It's an absolute nonsense.
Those accounts are for last season when Barnsley finished above us.
But again, I don't know what they are practically trying to base this off because we've agreed a business plan with the EFL and I'm sure most, if not all, clubs who failed FFP regulations in recent years, would also fail the year after as well because I can't imagine it's that easy to simply cut your costs within a season without selling the vast majority of your squad.
Said it a few times but, most clubs in this division do not have sustainable P&S models. Teams with parachute payments, for example, do not have a long-term sustainable P&S model for the Championship.
Could be but I'm pretty sure that the terms of the penalty mean that we can't lose any more points this season, so at this point worst case is relegation and - 6 next year. I would hope we haven't been stupid enough to knowingly break the agreement or even how we could do that given EFL oversight.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:It depends on what they know, or what they believe they know. I don't know how they would know it, but there may be some information that they can gather, or predict. They'll have looked at our sales, incomings, outgoings etc and probably predicted that we will still be over. Again, to whatever level of accuracy would be scrutinised of course, but from their perspective, it could be worth a claim.Stranded wrote:I have no idea how they would know what the forecast is yet as I don't believe it is due until the end of the month. If we lose more than 13m this year with increased turnover and a lower wage bill we deserve the other 6 points but under the agreed decision that cannot be applied until next season I believe.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:
We can only assume they are saying that forecasting this seasons accounts means we would still fail the 3 year cycle of FFP.
But again, I don't know what they are practically trying to base this off because we've agreed a business plan with the EFL and I'm sure most, if not all, clubs who failed FFP regulations in recent years, would also fail the year after as well because I can't imagine it's that easy to simply cut your costs within a season without selling the vast majority of your squad.
Said it a few times but, most clubs in this division do not have sustainable P&S models. Teams with parachute payments, for example, do not have a long-term sustainable P&S model for the Championship.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Nick Shorey my Lord!, Wallington Royal, Za Vas and 290 guests