Stoke need to have some sort of restraining order put on them. Leave us alone!Brogue wrote:QPR, Stoke City and Cardiff City have all tabled offers to Reading’s out of contract midfielder Andy Rinomhota, as per Bristol Live
Stoke need to have some sort of restraining order put on them. Leave us alone!Brogue wrote:QPR, Stoke City and Cardiff City have all tabled offers to Reading’s out of contract midfielder Andy Rinomhota, as per Bristol Live
So basically 3 clubs that will all likely be better options than ourselves. Be a shame to lose him along with Laurent and is another body to replace, but not hurting really. Providing we can recruit correctly this summer, we should be ok to replace both him and Laurent. Just a tad concerning to lose our regular midfield trio all in one summer, all on frees as well (but we can't do much about that ultimately).Brogue wrote:QPR, Stoke City and Cardiff City have all tabled offers to Reading’s out of contract midfielder Andy Rinomhota, as per Bristol Live
He is apparently training with us so you never know. I hope he decides very soon as we could miss out on potential replacements.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:So basically 3 clubs that will all likely be better options than ourselves. Be a shame to lose him along with Laurent and is another body to replace, but not hurting really. Providing we can recruit correctly this summer, we should be ok to replace both him and Laurent. Just a tad concerning to lose our regular midfield trio all in one summer, all on frees as well (but we can't do much about that ultimately).Brogue wrote:QPR, Stoke City and Cardiff City have all tabled offers to Reading’s out of contract midfielder Andy Rinomhota, as per Bristol Live
They’re welcome to themNathStPaul wrote:Stoke need to have some sort of restraining order put on them. Leave us alone!Brogue wrote:QPR, Stoke City and Cardiff City have all tabled offers to Reading’s out of contract midfielder Andy Rinomhota, as per Bristol Live
You don't mind tying yourself in knots do you.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Because they've been pants for the best part of 18 months. Rino missed most of last season and we got by without him, albeit barely, and Laurent did pick up under Ince but was a shadow of his former self before that. I remember there being a big uproar when we lost Rino towards the back end of last season as a significant blow (myself included) and we still managed to survive with ease and it never really looked like we missed him either. Only really the Blackpool game where I thought we could have used him, not to mention we've got Tetek breaking through who may prove to be a useful, ready-made replacement alongside a more experienced pro with quality.
As some have mentioned, sometimes it's better to sacrifice (subjective) individual quality for a better team/structure.
The real significant loss is Swift where he was one of the main drivers of making sure we were safe last season, he won't be so easily replaced.
Or you can spin it to make it sound like something it's not?Snowflake Royal wrote:You don't mind tying yourself in knots do you.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Because they've been pants for the best part of 18 months. Rino missed most of last season and we got by without him, albeit barely, and Laurent did pick up under Ince but was a shadow of his former self before that. I remember there being a big uproar when we lost Rino towards the back end of last season as a significant blow (myself included) and we still managed to survive with ease and it never really looked like we missed him either. Only really the Blackpool game where I thought we could have used him, not to mention we've got Tetek breaking through who may prove to be a useful, ready-made replacement alongside a more experienced pro with quality.
As some have mentioned, sometimes it's better to sacrifice (subjective) individual quality for a better team/structure.
The real significant loss is Swift where he was one of the main drivers of making sure we were safe last season, he won't be so easily replaced.
Rino's been rubbish for 18 months, but he barely played, but we didn't miss him but we were rubbish in midfield.
![]()
Hasn't Josh Laurent only been at the club 24 months? He's been poor for 18 of those months? Are you sure about that?YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Or you can spin it to make it sound like something it's not?Snowflake Royal wrote:You don't mind tying yourself in knots do you.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Because they've been pants for the best part of 18 months. Rino missed most of last season and we got by without him, albeit barely, and Laurent did pick up under Ince but was a shadow of his former self before that. I remember there being a big uproar when we lost Rino towards the back end of last season as a significant blow (myself included) and we still managed to survive with ease and it never really looked like we missed him either. Only really the Blackpool game where I thought we could have used him, not to mention we've got Tetek breaking through who may prove to be a useful, ready-made replacement alongside a more experienced pro with quality.
As some have mentioned, sometimes it's better to sacrifice (subjective) individual quality for a better team/structure.
The real significant loss is Swift where he was one of the main drivers of making sure we were safe last season, he won't be so easily replaced.
Rino's been rubbish for 18 months, but he barely played, but we didn't miss him but we were rubbish in midfield.
![]()
Laurent has been poor for 18 months bar the last 10-ish games under Ince, Rino has barely played and when he was, hasn't been great.
But yes, we didn't miss someone who hasn't played well, when available, that's usually how it works. It's not like Rino every came in and we were suddenly good again.
Fair enough, bit of a stretch going back 18 months, but he was part of a poor midfield during the second half of the season before last. I suppose he wasn't "poor" per say, but not up to the standard he was in the first 6 months, like most of the players though, underperforming nonetheless.NathStPaul wrote:Hasn't Josh Laurent only been at the club 24 months? He's been poor for 18 of those months? Are you sure about that?YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Or you can spin it to make it sound like something it's not?Snowflake Royal wrote: You don't mind tying yourself in knots do you.
Rino's been rubbish for 18 months, but he barely played, but we didn't miss him but we were rubbish in midfield.
![]()
Laurent has been poor for 18 months bar the last 10-ish games under Ince, Rino has barely played and when he was, hasn't been great.
But yes, we didn't miss someone who hasn't played well, when available, that's usually how it works. It's not like Rino every came in and we were suddenly good again.
Agreed - any nobber who really thinks we can lose Laurent, Swift and Rino and yet have a better team this coming season really is deluded. I can only see a season of struggle ahead. Basically the only players we will be able to sign this summer (apart from ones like Yiadom and Holmes who have some loyalty to the club), will be ones that no decent team wants.NathStPaul wrote:How is it not a disaster to lose our starting central midfielders? Seems pretty important to me. Very good chance that whoever we replace Laurent and Rinomhota with won't be as good.
As mentioned, the significant loss is Swift of the 3 due to his contributions. Laurent was a bit of a stinker because he showed signs of improvement under Ince and did contribute at important times, but even if Rino leaves with him, they are likely to move to similar levels. Laurent has moved to a mid-table team, Rino has been linked mostly with mid-table teams. Good, but not great, players that have underperformed (when available) for us in the main, especially last year. Certainly replaceable, Swift is the difficult one to replace.andrew1957 wrote:Agreed - any nobber who really thinks we can lose Laurent, Swift and Rino and yet have a better team this coming season really is deluded. I can only see a season of struggle ahead. Basically the only players we will be able to sign this summer (apart from ones like Yiadom and Holmes who have some loyalty to the club), will be ones that no decent team wants.NathStPaul wrote:How is it not a disaster to lose our starting central midfielders? Seems pretty important to me. Very good chance that whoever we replace Laurent and Rinomhota with won't be as good.
Agreed - and maybe Ince saw that too, hence the move to number 10 with less defensive responsibilityWycombe Royal wrote:Laurent is one of those players who looks good and fans love because he is charging all over the pitch getting stuck in wherever he can. He comes across as a team player. But, charging around like that can actually be a hinderance to to his team mates, getting in their way and not being where he should be to receive a pass, make a block, leaving areas of the pitch exposed, etc....
I would much rather have a disciplined midfielder who can hold a formation together and not help us to look like a disorganised rabble on the pitch. Too often he left gaps in the midfield because he had a gone on a charging run somewhere only to lose the ball.
And yet aside from the first 6 months of last season and a brief resurgence under Bowen, we’ve struggled for a good 4/5 years now, with the aforementioned trio (certainly the latter two) featuring in a heavy chunk of thatandrew1957 wrote:Agreed - any nobber who really thinks we can lose Laurent, Swift and Rino and yet have a better team this coming season really is deluded. I can only see a season of struggle ahead. Basically the only players we will be able to sign this summer (apart from ones like Yiadom and Holmes who have some loyalty to the club), will be ones that no decent team wants.NathStPaul wrote:How is it not a disaster to lose our starting central midfielders? Seems pretty important to me. Very good chance that whoever we replace Laurent and Rinomhota with won't be as good.
Agreed, hardly a disaster when our midfield has been so poor for a while. Carried by Swift and Olise the year beforeURZZZZ wrote:And yet aside from the first 6 months of last season and a brief resurgence under Bowen, we’ve struggled for a good 4/5 years now, with the aforementioned trio (certainly the latter two) featuring in a heavy chunk of thatandrew1957 wrote:Agreed - any nobber who really thinks we can lose Laurent, Swift and Rino and yet have a better team this coming season really is deluded. I can only see a season of struggle ahead. Basically the only players we will be able to sign this summer (apart from ones like Yiadom and Holmes who have some loyalty to the club), will be ones that no decent team wants.NathStPaul wrote:How is it not a disaster to lose our starting central midfielders? Seems pretty important to me. Very good chance that whoever we replace Laurent and Rinomhota with won't be as good.
Not saying their individual contributions have been the cause of it (but FWIW think they’ve all been fairly average for a while now, less so Swift) but there’s too much of a losers’ mentality in the squad and so losing the longer serving players, the likes of Moore, Swift, Rinomhota etc may not as big an issue as people think
To reiterate, going to Stoke, West Brom and Cardiff respectively are hardly glowing moves
Users browsing this forum: Beaulux, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], rfc8, Royals and Racers and 114 guests