Interesting that we are still talking about a ‘stretched’ squad. We have 25 ‘permitted’ players and probably another 10 youngsters who have been around the first team for a year now and have to start being considered able to play a role at some point. I don’t know what the average first team squad in the division is but I feel that maybe we shouldn’t be using lack of players as an excuse (not that excuses are currently needed !). Of course injuries play a part but we have far fewer injuries now than we did a month ago.Stranded wrote:Next 10 games are tough with the stretched squad we have and that make yesterday's win key. Now if we suddenly struggle and say only take 9 points form the next 10, we will still be at 30pts before the WC break, which would be a massive step towards safety.royalp-we wrote:It’s all about balance and this league is closer than ever, the championship never disappoints![]()
When we got throttled at Rovrum and Sheff Utd we were the worst team they had seen in memory. Now we are saying the same about Hudds.
Such a tough run ahead on paper and I have absolutely no idea where we will finish this season.
We've managed 7 wins in 11, we probably only need to find 8 more in 35.
Most improved player by a mile. Beginning of the season I was a bit worried, but thought he looked good yesterday. Would be well worth a contract extension.NewCorkSeth wrote:Weird how good NWG looked.. like a settled championship full back.
Agree. I think we've got a pretty big squad.Nameless wrote:Interesting that we are still talking about a ‘stretched’ squad. We have 25 ‘permitted’ players and probably another 10 youngsters who have been around the first team for a year now and have to start being considered able to play a role at some point. I don’t know what the average first team squad in the division is but I feel that maybe we shouldn’t be using lack of players as an excuse (not that excuses are currently needed !). Of course injuries play a part but we have far fewer injuries now than we did a month ago.Stranded wrote:Next 10 games are tough with the stretched squad we have and that make yesterday's win key. Now if we suddenly struggle and say only take 9 points form the next 10, we will still be at 30pts before the WC break, which would be a massive step towards safety.royalp-we wrote:It’s all about balance and this league is closer than ever, the championship never disappoints![]()
When we got throttled at Rovrum and Sheff Utd we were the worst team they had seen in memory. Now we are saying the same about Hudds.
Such a tough run ahead on paper and I have absolutely no idea where we will finish this season.
We've managed 7 wins in 11, we probably only need to find 8 more in 35.
Is that including Hoilett at RWB?Snowflake Royal wrote:Agree. I think we've got a pretty big squad.Nameless wrote:Interesting that we are still talking about a ‘stretched’ squad. We have 25 ‘permitted’ players and probably another 10 youngsters who have been around the first team for a year now and have to start being considered able to play a role at some point. I don’t know what the average first team squad in the division is but I feel that maybe we shouldn’t be using lack of players as an excuse (not that excuses are currently needed !). Of course injuries play a part but we have far fewer injuries now than we did a month ago.Stranded wrote:
Next 10 games are tough with the stretched squad we have and that make yesterday's win key. Now if we suddenly struggle and say only take 9 points form the next 10, we will still be at 30pts before the WC break, which would be a massive step towards safety.
We've managed 7 wins in 11, we probably only need to find 8 more in 35.
Even with substantial injuries and not counting Academy players we've got 14 senior players available with no holes in a starting XI.
Yep, he's made pretty much all his appearances at left or right wingback this season. I wouldn’t want to use him as a traditional fullback except in an emergency, and I wouldn’t say he'd be first choice at WB, but that's his position now, it seems.NewCorkSeth wrote:Is that including Hoilett at RWB?Snowflake Royal wrote:Agree. I think we've got a pretty big squad.Nameless wrote:
Interesting that we are still talking about a ‘stretched’ squad. We have 25 ‘permitted’ players and probably another 10 youngsters who have been around the first team for a year now and have to start being considered able to play a role at some point. I don’t know what the average first team squad in the division is but I feel that maybe we shouldn’t be using lack of players as an excuse (not that excuses are currently needed !). Of course injuries play a part but we have far fewer injuries now than we did a month ago.
Even with substantial injuries and not counting Academy players we've got 14 senior players available with no holes in a starting XI.
I agree, just surprised you're allowing a round peg in a square hole. You're getting soft.Snowflake Royal wrote:Yep, he's made pretty much all his appearances at left or right wingback this season. I wouldn’t want to use him as a traditional fullback except in an emergency, and I wouldn’t say he'd be first choice at WB, but that's his position now, it seems.NewCorkSeth wrote:Is that including Hoilett at RWB?Snowflake Royal wrote: Agree. I think we've got a pretty big squad.
Even with substantial injuries and not counting Academy players we've got 14 senior players available with no holes in a starting XI.
Yep. It was, and still is, a sinking ship. Still pretty early and it's a tight league, but they'll need their fortunes to change and probably some significant investment in Janury in order to survive I think.South Coast Royal wrote:The manager knew what he was doing by quitting in the summer knowing that after losing players there wasn't a great deal left.
Nameless wrote:Interesting that we are still talking about a ‘stretched’ squad. We have 25 ‘permitted’ players and probably another 10 youngsters who have been around the first team for a year now and have to start being considered able to play a role at some point. I don’t know what the average first team squad in the division is but I feel that maybe we shouldn’t be using lack of players as an excuse (not that excuses are currently needed !). Of course injuries play a part but we have far fewer injuries now than we did a month ago.Stranded wrote:Next 10 games are tough with the stretched squad we have and that make yesterday's win key. Now if we suddenly struggle and say only take 9 points form the next 10, we will still be at 30pts before the WC break, which would be a massive step towards safety.royalp-we wrote:It’s all about balance and this league is closer than ever, the championship never disappoints![]()
When we got throttled at Rovrum and Sheff Utd we were the worst team they had seen in memory. Now we are saying the same about Hudds.
Such a tough run ahead on paper and I have absolutely no idea where we will finish this season.
We've managed 7 wins in 11, we probably only need to find 8 more in 35.
Never against converting players. W vs WB is lots of crossover too.NewCorkSeth wrote:I agree, just surprised you're allowing a round peg in a square hole. You're getting soft.Snowflake Royal wrote:Yep, he's made pretty much all his appearances at left or right wingback this season. I wouldn’t want to use him as a traditional fullback except in an emergency, and I wouldn’t say he'd be first choice at WB, but that's his position now, it seems.NewCorkSeth wrote: Is that including Hoilett at RWB?
I always consider 7 to be far less than the dozen we have had previously. We’re fielding an entire bench of seasoned pros rather than an entire bench of callow youth.Zip wrote:Nameless wrote:Interesting that we are still talking about a ‘stretched’ squad. We have 25 ‘permitted’ players and probably another 10 youngsters who have been around the first team for a year now and have to start being considered able to play a role at some point. I don’t know what the average first team squad in the division is but I feel that maybe we shouldn’t be using lack of players as an excuse (not that excuses are currently needed !). Of course injuries play a part but we have far fewer injuries now than we did a month ago.Stranded wrote:
Next 10 games are tough with the stretched squad we have and that make yesterday's win key. Now if we suddenly struggle and say only take 9 points form the next 10, we will still be at 30pts before the WC break, which would be a massive step towards safety.
We've managed 7 wins in 11, we probably only need to find 8 more in 35.
Agreed the squad size is fine but we don't have far fewer injuries with seven likely to be out for Norwich albeit that does include Moore.
I think last season was the anomaly, as it seems to be proving. They are currently 23rd and the 2 seasons previous to last season they finished 20th and 18th. They lost their best player in O'Brien and their 2 full backs departed, likely along with a couple of others as well. So, they were already struggling for quality in the main but lost some of their starting players in the process and haven't spent a great deal to replace them either. Looking for new investment as well, not a huge surprise this season sees them struggling again.TiagoIlori wrote:Honestly, you’d be forgiven for thinking Huddersfield were a newly promoted team on a shoestring budget and not a team that were 90 minutes away from the Premier League by reading the comments alone. Horrible change of fortunes.
Sarr and MooreNameless wrote:I always consider 7 to be far less than the dozen we have had previously. We’re fielding an entire bench of seasoned pros rather than an entire bench of callow youth.Zip wrote:Nameless wrote:
Interesting that we are still talking about a ‘stretched’ squad. We have 25 ‘permitted’ players and probably another 10 youngsters who have been around the first team for a year now and have to start being considered able to play a role at some point. I don’t know what the average first team squad in the division is but I feel that maybe we shouldn’t be using lack of players as an excuse (not that excuses are currently needed !). Of course injuries play a part but we have far fewer injuries now than we did a month ago.
Agreed the squad size is fine but we don't have far fewer injuries with seven likely to be out for Norwich albeit that does include Moore.
Who are the 7?
Dann, Yiadom, Baba, Azeez, Long ......?
Sarr and Moore I believe there.Nameless wrote:I always consider 7 to be far less than the dozen we have had previously. We’re fielding an entire bench of seasoned pros rather than an entire bench of callow youth.Zip wrote:Nameless wrote:
Interesting that we are still talking about a ‘stretched’ squad. We have 25 ‘permitted’ players and probably another 10 youngsters who have been around the first team for a year now and have to start being considered able to play a role at some point. I don’t know what the average first team squad in the division is but I feel that maybe we shouldn’t be using lack of players as an excuse (not that excuses are currently needed !). Of course injuries play a part but we have far fewer injuries now than we did a month ago.
Agreed the squad size is fine but we don't have far fewer injuries with seven likely to be out for Norwich albeit that does include Moore.
Who are the 7?
Dann, Yiadom, Baba, Azeez, Long ......?
Yes there has been a slight improvement. That's how I would phrase it. We never seem to get close to having a fully fot squad.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Sarr and Moore I believe there.Nameless wrote:I always consider 7 to be far less than the dozen we have had previously. We’re fielding an entire bench of seasoned pros rather than an entire bench of callow youth.Zip wrote:
Agreed the squad size is fine but we don't have far fewer injuries with seven likely to be out for Norwich albeit that does include Moore.
Who are the 7?
Dann, Yiadom, Baba, Azeez, Long ......?
Meite has just recently come back from a spell injured, Loum missed a game or so as well etc. Think it was more an overview of the season thus far, granted their does seem to be a slight improvement.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Humpty Jumpshoes and 228 guests