QPR v Reading - - - - Match 14 - - - - 2022-2023 Prediction League

[Franconian Royal]

What are the points after this game?

[Snowball]

30 Moon Pig
24 Horsham. (15+5++4) Bonus, FT Score, Carroll
24 Snowball. (15+3+2+4) Bonus, HT Score, Carroll, RDG FTG correct half)
19 MorganB
19 Regular John
16 Royal Forester
15 Franconian Royal (incl -3)
02 Jackson Corner
01 Royal Jimmy

Moon Pig

15 Bonus
03 HT Score
02 FT Result
05 QPR to win from behind
04 Carroll, Correct Half
01 FT to score (posted incorrectly, not changed despite advice. (2 or 0? Split the difference)

Royal Jimmy

Incorrect Format

There is one “hold-out” (Jackson Corner) who misses the bonus every match.
Even though 0-0 means 0-0 HT and 0-0 FT, it’s still wrong format, and JC would
score zero bonus points. I replied in thread and also PM’d RJ to suggest he corrected his post.

Sorry, had I allowed this to pass, it would be unfair to JC and/or hypocritical.

[Snowball]

30 Moon Pig
24 Horsham.
24 Snowball.
19 MorganB
19 Regular John
16 Royal Forester
15 Franconian Royal (incl -3)
02 Jackson Corner
01 Royal Jimmy

[Snowball]

OVERALL


239 + 24 = 263 Snowball
220 + 16 = 236 Royal Forester
217 + 19 = 236 MorganB
217 + 15 = 232 Franconian Royal
206 + 24 = 230 Horsham Royal
199 + 19 = 218 Regular John
177 + 01= 178 Royal Jimmy
118 + 30 = 148 Moon Pig <<<<<<<<<
031 + 00 = 031 John Smith
-13 + 02 = -11 Jackson Corner

[Snowball]

OVERALL


263 Snowball
236 Royal Forester
236 MorganB
232 Franconian Royal
230 Horsham Royal
218 Regular John
178 Royal Jimmy
148 Moon Pig
031 John Smith
-11 Jackson Corner

[The Royal Forester]

Reading (Carroll) to score first, then QPR to equalise first half… PERFICK!!

Followed by QPR to go 2-1 up…

On for a four goal sequence, except we didn’t get the fourth goal

Not bad, though…

15 Bonus
02 Reading First Goal
04 CARROL. Correct Half
03 Correct HT Score

24 Points

Had RDG equalised from 2-1 down that would’ve been correct sequence, correct final score = 50-60 points!!

Even though I knew it would have meant using a telescope to see you so far ahead I was still hoping we would score a second goal, Would that have been the first time anyone had got that prediction correct? I don't remember it happening before.

[Snowball]

Reading (Carroll) to score first, then QPR to equalise first half… PERFICK!!

Followed by QPR to go 2-1 up…

On for a four goal sequence, except we didn’t get the fourth goal

Not bad, though…

15 Bonus
02 Reading First Goal
04 CARROL. Correct Half
03 Correct HT Score

24 Points

Had RDG equalised from 2-1 down that would’ve been correct sequence, correct final score = 50-60 points!!

Even though I knew it would have meant using a telescope to see you so far ahead I was still hoping we would score a second goal, Would that have been the first time anyone had got that prediction correct? I don't remember it happening before.

Coupla seasons back I had two sequences correct (2-1s I think)

But I don’t think anyone has had 2-2 with the right sequence

It’s POSSIBLE to get the RDG scorers and times right too… scary number of points if you do!

[Snowball]

To be clear we have had successful 2-2 FT predictions
But not the sequence

[Snowball]

QPR 0---0 Reading HT
QPR 1---1 Reading FT

QPR to score first in second half in 62 minutes
Reading to draw from behind

No goals
===========
(62) QPR 1---0 Reading
(87) QPR 1---1 Reading Ince (alt. Meite)

UNABLE TO PM YOU so see below

PLEASE NOTE

Next three games

Reading v WBA
Swansea v Reading
Reading v Bristol

All the threads started, deadlines altered
and big bonuses available