If he wasn’t under contract there wouldn’t be a conversation - we’d just ask him to stop turning up and bothering us !Snowflake Royal wrote:Believe he is in contract, so going nowhere unless another club offers him a similar deal.
Notice when describing Birmingham he uses the word ‘we’ but uses ‘it’ - ‘to be where it is, is sad for football ‘ when talking about about us."At Blues, we had ownership problems, which look like they’ve completely changed now, and it looks a fantastic club. Reading is in a real state. For such a club, like Reading, to be where it is, is sad for football.
"People in power don’t recognise or do the right due diligence on people buying clubs because of what the club has had to go through, the manager, the players, redundancies, no food, and no away travel. For a club the size of Reading, it’s disgraceful. Everyone involved has done well to guide them to safety."
Think its completely fair to say, the move has been a total disaster from both sides and the sooner both parties are able to move on the better it will be for all.Brogue wrote:In his recent interview he kept referring to us in past tense. He will be off I’m sure
Notice when describing Birmingham he uses the word ‘we’ but uses ‘it’ - ‘to be where it is, is sad for football ‘ when talking about about us."At Blues, we had ownership problems, which look like they’ve completely changed now, and it looks a fantastic club. Reading is in a real state. For such a club, like Reading, to be where it is, is sad for football.
"People in power don’t recognise or do the right due diligence on people buying clubs because of what the club has had to go through, the manager, the players, redundancies, no food, and no away travel. For a club the size of Reading, it’s disgraceful. Everyone involved has done well to guide them to safety."
Then the second paragraph lots of ‘the’… ‘the’ club ‘the manager’ ‘the players’. No use of ‘our’ . Then uses the word ‘them’ in the last sentence. ‘Guide them to safety’
He never uses ‘us’ or ‘we’ when describing Reading.
I dunno maybe I’m reading too much into it but it doesn’t seem the language he’s chosen to use there is conducive with a player committed to the club, or indeed a player that is staying. It’s just very detached language
This could be a problemSutekh wrote:Until new owners come in and sit down with the management to decide about the playing side of things Harlee is not leaving the football club. Maybe the management want him around as a player or just for sharing experience with younger players or to maybe bring into the coaching side of the game. Alternatively perhaps, when the ownership is sorted the club will look to come to a mutual agreement to pay up the rest of his agreement before he's o.o.c. next summer.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:So is he leaving? Any update on this?
Probably not a priority right now.
Thank you for your fantastic levels of insight.Crusader Royal wrote:If he wasn’t under contract there wouldn’t be a conversation - we’d just ask him to stop turning up and bothering us !Snowflake Royal wrote:Believe he is in contract, so going nowhere unless another club offers him a similar deal.
Well it happen3d exactlh as you described at least once, so fair enough.leon wrote:11 League appearances won 1 drawn 1 lost 9
He was the sub we'd bring on to shore up the defence and seal the points and then we'd concede*
No thanks.
* have no idea if this is true but it just feels that way
he's still jogging back for that corner at Eastleigh.Ascotexgunner wrote:I actually forgot he was with us still.