Wouldn't be a bad thing in this team of everyone rush forward and leave acres of space behind for the opposition to run into after one rushed pass goes astray.yuomi wrote:Was talking to a Rangers fan friend shortly after Ovie signed and he called his time with us pretty much to a tee. Frustrating, flashes of brilliance but everything totally on his own terms and with very little regard for the team or club as a whole.
Thought he tended to stifle our momentum and slow down play. His skills, while impressive, far too often led to nothing. I'm sure there's a player in there, and with the right manager/motivation he could kick on. But if he wasn't being motivated by what we were paying him he better hope his agent has contacts in Saudi Arabia.
Well there is certainly a suggestion we’ve saved money by doing this so must have come to some agreement and not just paid the contract off. Which is better than a lot of the wasters we’ve had over the years that have just let their sky high wages run the course of the contractSutekh wrote:Supposedly £12,500.00 p.w. saved so good for that reason, perhaps that will make the inability to pay others on time less likely in the coming months.
Wonder how much it cost to pay him off though.
Some credit for Ovie there then.Hound wrote:Well there is certainly a suggestion we’ve saved money by doing this so must have come to some agreement and not just paid the contract off. Which is better than a lot of the wasters we’ve had over the years that have just let their sky high wages run the course of the contractSutekh wrote:Supposedly £12,500.00 p.w. saved so good for that reason, perhaps that will make the inability to pay others on time less likely in the coming months.
Wonder how much it cost to pay him off though.
Will he? He may equally look back and regret even playing football at all.Reading4eva wrote:Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard.
Good riddance. He will one day look back and think what could have been of his football career if he gave more for this football club.
I would imagine there has been some negotiation to reach an agreeable figure, likely paid in instalments that allows him to leave now and be able to negotiate elsewhere as a free agent, if he wishes to. Position may well have been, you can leave now and receive 50% of your wages or you can continue to receive 100% be contracted until the end of June but we won't include you in first team training or any games at any level. Would mean him not playing football of any kind for 2 years, not an enticing free agent.Hound wrote:Well there is certainly a suggestion we’ve saved money by doing this so must have come to some agreement and not just paid the contract off. Which is better than a lot of the wasters we’ve had over the years that have just let their sky high wages run the course of the contractSutekh wrote:Supposedly £12,500.00 p.w. saved so good for that reason, perhaps that will make the inability to pay others on time less likely in the coming months.
Wonder how much it cost to pay him off though.
Back in the day I used to watch a lot of Sunday League football and the best player I ever saw was Nevada Phillips who played for Dee Road (among others). Apprentice at Spurs who let him go due to his attitude, had a spell at Reading where I recall the attitude continued. Had a decent spell in non-league where his indiscretions were overlooked.Elm Park Kid wrote:Obviously no one knows the full story. I hope he manages to sort himself out (or whatever was going wrong) and finds success elsewhere.
I remember reading this book by an ex-scout who said that when looking at young players you had to really investigate their background and personality. Because there were so many gifted, passionate players that he knew would never make it because they didn't have the mental strength to back it up. They would inevitably go off the rails at some point. It's just amazing to think that there are all these potential professional players who didn't make it because . . well. . .because they're basically dicks.
Given our financial situation, i'd be surprised really if we paid him anything upfront. I wouldn't be surprised if we simply agreed to monthly instalment payments mirroring his wages until/if he gets a new club.Sutekh wrote:Supposedly £12,500.00 p.w. saved so good for that reason, perhaps that will make the inability to pay others on time less likely in the coming months.
Wonder how much it cost to pay him off though.
We also had a better team from when he was playing, compared to when he was not, when you look at individuals at least anyway. The likes of Swift, Meite at his best, Joao at his best, Puscas' good season etc. I don't think the team was significantly better with solely him in the team.andrew1957 wrote:People forget that in terms of points per game we did better when Ejaria was playing then when he was not. He was an undeniable talent and it is sad that something went horribly wrong behind the scenes. No point speculating what now that he has gone, but I wish him well and hope he can make it somewhere.
Hopefully it will save the club some money too (if he can find a new club soon) and assuming we are able/allowed to sign any players in January, it frees up a place in the squad.
Bugger off back to the Bournemouth forum.Reading4eva wrote:Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard.
Good riddance. He will one day look back and think what could have been of his football career if he gave more for this football club.
Or the how intelligent are you thread on AE!NathStPaul wrote:Bugger off back to the Bournemouth forum.Reading4eva wrote:Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard.
Good riddance. He will one day look back and think what could have been of his football career if he gave more for this football club.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Doc, Google Adsense [Bot] and 282 guests