The report on the website is literally about online racial abuse, on Twitter, from a Reading fan to an Orient player. But you know that already, so I will return to ignoring you.karbota wrote:Ok, So nothing in the report then, just some stupid spout on twitter.tmesis wrote:The fact that his profile pic had him in a Reading shirt, and he had ReadingFC in his twitter handle were a couple of subtle clues.karbota wrote:
Where in that report does it suggest it was a Reading fan involved?
To be fair, he does seem genuinely concerned about the amount of racist abuse.NathStPaul wrote:Yeah keep responding to him lads, really helps.
Nah. Ban him for life. He's a racist. He can 'learn' not to be racist somewhere away from RFC.WestYorksRoyal wrote:The behaviour is shameful, but this kid looks like he's only 16. I'd say an 18 - 24 month ban from the SCL is sufficient given he's also had the shame of his face and name all over social media. Hopefully he can learn the right lessons from this (and I don't mean hiding his identity better).
You're probably right, but with someone that young, who might just be a massive twat now who will do some growing up, lifetime for one instance is pretty extreme.Sanguine wrote:Nah. Ban him for life. He's a racist. He can 'learn' not to be racist somewhere away from RFC.WestYorksRoyal wrote:The behaviour is shameful, but this kid looks like he's only 16. I'd say an 18 - 24 month ban from the SCL is sufficient given he's also had the shame of his face and name all over social media. Hopefully he can learn the right lessons from this (and I don't mean hiding his identity better).
My view, if it had been a heat of the moment thing - mid game, angry etc and he shouted/tweeted there and then, then I would probably fall on the side of 5 seasons etc but from what I can tell it was done much later on, after any initial anger would/should have dissapated, so the tweet was either a view of his true feelings or playing for clicks - so nah, see ya later mate, you're done here.Snowflake Royal wrote:You're probably right, but with someone that young, who might just be a massive twat now who will do some growing up, lifetime for one instance is pretty extreme.Sanguine wrote:Nah. Ban him for life. He's a racist. He can 'learn' not to be racist somewhere away from RFC.WestYorksRoyal wrote:The behaviour is shameful, but this kid looks like he's only 16. I'd say an 18 - 24 month ban from the SCL is sufficient given he's also had the shame of his face and name all over social media. Hopefully he can learn the right lessons from this (and I don't mean hiding his identity better).
Five is where I'd go, but wouldn’t get upset at lifetime.
Fair enough.Stranded wrote:My view, if it had been a heat of the moment thing - mid game, angry etc and he shouted/tweeted there and then, then I would probably fall on the side of 5 seasons etc but from what I can tell it was done much later on, after any initial anger would/should have dissapated, so the tweet was either a view of his true feelings or playing for clicks - so nah, see ya later mate, you're done here.Snowflake Royal wrote:You're probably right, but with someone that young, who might just be a massive twat now who will do some growing up, lifetime for one instance is pretty extreme.Sanguine wrote:
Nah. Ban him for life. He's a racist. He can 'learn' not to be racist somewhere away from RFC.
Five is where I'd go, but wouldn’t get upset at lifetime.
Not sure I agree with emotions as a mitigation; if you say something like that it reflects your view end of. It's the same as people who use being drunk as an excuse to be a dickhead; it just means you're a dickhead and most normal people don't turn into one after a few drinks.Stranded wrote:My view, if it had been a heat of the moment thing - mid game, angry etc and he shouted/tweeted there and then, then I would probably fall on the side of 5 seasons etc but from what I can tell it was done much later on, after any initial anger would/should have dissapated, so the tweet was either a view of his true feelings or playing for clicks - so nah, see ya later mate, you're done here.Snowflake Royal wrote:You're probably right, but with someone that young, who might just be a massive twat now who will do some growing up, lifetime for one instance is pretty extreme.Sanguine wrote:
Nah. Ban him for life. He's a racist. He can 'learn' not to be racist somewhere away from RFC.
Five is where I'd go, but wouldn’t get upset at lifetime.
There are banning orders, which would make it a criminal offence to enter a football ground (with up to a six month prison sentence).Brogue wrote:does the club use facial recognition cctv? just don't see how they could police a lifetime ban its not like all the stewards carry a book of photos of Reading's 'most wanted'. just grow a beard go in a different entrance sit in a different seat. maybe LWJ can flesh this out a bit for us?
Why is it a problem if they do? I see no reason why people shouldn't be made accountable to the public for their actions. If that person can't find a job because of it, tough shit, don't be racist.Royal_jimmy wrote:Can't believe anyone would post racism directly on twitter. He'll have fun finding a job
Apart from when John Mackie racially abusing Carl Asaba in 2002.NathStPaul wrote:Reading FC are many things but we have never been a club associated with racism, stamp it out nice and early.
And when our own fans sang racist songs about Seol and Al-Habsi.RG30 wrote:Apart from when John Mackie racially abusing Carl Asaba in 2002.NathStPaul wrote:Reading FC are many things but we have never been a club associated with racism, stamp it out nice and early.
That's a stretch and a bit.SCIAG wrote:And when our own fans sang racist songs about Seol and Al-Habsi.RG30 wrote:Apart from when John Mackie racially abusing Carl Asaba in 2002.NathStPaul wrote:Reading FC are many things but we have never been a club associated with racism, stamp it out nice and early.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 249 guests