It will now stand at just Little's brief loan spell at Bolton won't it?Platypuss wrote:Not to mention that our depth of Premiership experience is now even more meagre.
It will now stand at just Little's brief loan spell at Bolton won't it?Platypuss wrote:Not to mention that our depth of Premiership experience is now even more meagre.
Oster.southbank1871 wrote:It will now stand at just Little's brief loan spell at Bolton won't it?Platypuss wrote:Not to mention that our depth of Premiership experience is now even more meagre.
And Oster. Not sure how that will help much, though!southbank1871 wrote:It will now stand at just Little's brief loan spell at Bolton won't it?Platypuss wrote:Not to mention that our depth of Premiership experience is now even more meagre.
Wasn't Marcus at Fulham when they were in the Prem or did he leave before?Platypuss wrote:And Oster. Not sure how that will help much, though!southbank1871 wrote:It will now stand at just Little's brief loan spell at Bolton won't it?Platypuss wrote:Not to mention that our depth of Premiership experience is now even more meagre.
Yes, a very odd move. Maybe Coppell has seen Something in Halls in pre-season that makes him an adequate replacement and back up for Murty or Shorey. After all it wasn't long ago that Halls was being touted as a £1 Million player with bags of potential.Hoop Blah wrote:This is a really odd move. I can only assume that we're close to bringing new players in or that the club/Coppell have been very acommodating in sticking to this gentlemans agreement of letting him leave for a longer contract. A far cry from the Salako contract wrangle!
Makin was probably our second choice right and left back. He wouldn't have been spectacular and was getting on a bit, but he was a steady pro and I'd have been more comfortable with him stepping in to cover for Shorey than either Golbourne or Hunt.
My hope is that this is the start of a busy week or two in terms of transfers for RFC.
You seem to have forgotten that we had £3.5m offers for two players turned down, so it's not for want of trying. I guess Coppell's aiming for quality, not quantity.Schards#2 wrote:I seem to remember at the end of last season Coppell saying we would need 5-6 more players.
3 days before the start of the season, we have one more than last year.
What's changed or has Coppell beeen denied access to the £35,000,000 currently in our coffers?
I'm happy with our starting 11 but any injury problems and we're buggered.
That surely is why a loan deal is best? The player obviously has talent and at least if he is only on loan and shows poor discipline we don't have to keep him.Tilehurst Mike wrote:Not sure whether I want the loan deal for Bikey to come off or not. Seems too much of a 'hothead' to me and probably too much of a gamble to take.
Did Ingimarrson feature for Wolves before signing for us, while they were in the Premiership? Again, wont help much at all.Platypuss wrote:And Oster. Not sure how that will help much, though!southbank1871 wrote:It will now stand at just Little's brief loan spell at Bolton won't it?Platypuss wrote:Not to mention that our depth of Premiership experience is now even more meagre.
I think Oster will actually look even worse in the Prem - unfortunately he has the heart of a pea.wehateoxford wrote:the prem may suit oster as it will give him a bit more space, however i cant see him holding onto the ball more than he did in the championship, just not enough
Gordons Cumming wrote:Ever heard of cover, squad depth?RFCSinceBury1971 wrote:Why the panic? Makin is not a regular in the first team. Its no big deal.
I'm disappointed at this. Makin was a good, solid defender with plenty of experience.
There must be some other signings imminent..................there must be.
SC let him know exactly how he (SC) felt about the red card in Sweden and I'm sure he has enough experience to know how that effected the team. With his (Bikey's) experience of the top Russian league and his size, strength and athleticism I think we could do a lot worse than actually sign him.Wycombe Royal wrote:That surely is why a loan deal is best? The player obviously has talent and at least if he is only on loan and shows poor discipline we don't have to keep him.Tilehurst Mike wrote:Not sure whether I want the loan deal for Bikey to come off or not. Seems too much of a 'hothead' to me and probably too much of a gamble to take.
tbh i wouldnt be at all surprised or disappointed if oster flounders and crashes, he just looked really decent against birmingham.Platypuss wrote:I think Oster will actually look even worse in the Prem - unfortunately he has the heart of a pea.wehateoxford wrote:the prem may suit oster as it will give him a bit more space, however i cant see him holding onto the ball more than he did in the championship, just not enough
All IMO of course.
holsgrove breaks a leg wrote:Gordons Cumming wrote:Ever heard of cover, squad depth?RFCSinceBury1971 wrote:Why the panic? Makin is not a regular in the first team. Its no big deal.
I'm disappointed at this. Makin was a good, solid defender with plenty of experience.
There must be some other signings imminent..................there must be.
Sorry to go off the point but Wigan bought in 9 players last summer, plus Graham Kavanagh on the March deadline before hand. Of these 10 players I think 6 or 7 played against Chelsea in their opening Premiership game.holsgrove breaks a leg wrote:Take Wigan for example- they like us didnt go mad in the transfer market at the beginning of the season, thats fine but they did have players of prem experience particularily at CB with the likes of de Zeuw and Henchoz- the latter who they purchased at the beginning.
Users browsing this forum: rabidbee and 417 guests