What Spurs think

royalsteve · by **royalsteve** » 12 Nov 2006 23:38

Sir David of Brent wrote:
Chaney wrote:Reading V Spurs match threads them 42 pages us 5 pages
Thats because they say COYS every other post!

it means

FICKLE

M4 Junction 11 · by **M4 Junction 11** » 12 Nov 2006 23:38

royalsteve wrote:
Fat Leather Jacket wrote:They must represnt the 20 or so supporters left in the away end at final whistle.

What a bunch of fickle pansies.
couldnt believe that, 3-1 down with 12 mins to go and loads of their fickle fans left.....i mean a team at this level can score 2 goals in minutes.....

Never seen so many leave at once ... and 10 minutes to go

royalsteve · by **royalsteve** » 12 Nov 2006 23:39

zac naloen wrote:"New Wimbledon"

What the oxf*rd is that supposed to mean?

what tennis?

Amongst the sheep · by **Amongst the sheep** » 13 Nov 2006 00:21

They are another set of arrogant fans who think they are better than little Reading. We have suffered with this for years, well at least 3. I remember the same attitude from a West Ham 'fan' when they were relegated to the championship a couple of years ago. I think Spurs did not take us seriously today and paid the price.

bobby m's syrup · by **bobby m's syrup** » 13 Nov 2006 06:12

Spurs have, according to their fans, been under-achieving for years. I remeber them under-achieving so badly that they were relegated to the second tier, but that was a while back . Even further back are their 'glory days'.

IMO a new term 'Wolves Syndrome', should be coined for those nowadys mediocre sides who live in the past. Sunderland, Spurs, Southampton, any more nominations?

The 17 Bus · by **The 17 Bus** » 13 Nov 2006 07:24

Aldershot?

Super_horns · by **Super_horns** » 13 Nov 2006 07:43

Spurs said pretty much the same kind of stuff after we'd drawn to them although gave us some praise for being better than the they thought.

Usualy big boy thinking really...expect to just turn up and win without playing well.

RoyalBlue · by **RoyalBlue** » 13 Nov 2006 08:33

Derbyshire Royal wrote:Love this one!

"Yes I'm a sore loser but Reading look like the new Wimbledon. The sooner we reduce the number of teams in the EPL the better. "

That's fine, cos the way they played, they'll be leaving before us!

And Hansen was quite right - you wouldn't see corners defended that badly at an Under 9s game - Spurs!

Philly Flyer · by **Philly Flyer** » 13 Nov 2006 08:37

Just looked on "gory, gory" and noticed that for an established Premier League club they have just 3600 odd members...now they may have other fora but that seems to fit with their rubbish, fickle fans.

papereyes · by **papereyes** » 13 Nov 2006 09:07

Basically we are rubbish and they had an off day

Didn't that happen every game in 02-03 and 05-06 seasons?

SpaceCruiser · by **SpaceCruiser** » 13 Nov 2006 11:51

The 17 Bus wrote:Aldershot?

What glory days did they have?

RIP ELM Park · by **RIP ELM Park** » 13 Nov 2006 14:50

bobby m's syrup wrote:Spurs have, according to their fans, been under-achieving for years. I remeber them under-achieving so badly that they were relegated to the second tier, but that was a while back . Even further back are their 'glory days'.

IMO a new term 'Wolves Syndrome', should be coined for those nowadys mediocre sides who live in the past. Sunderland, Spurs, Southampton, any more nominations?

Leeds

From Despair To Where? · by **From Despair To Where?** » 13 Nov 2006 20:41

M4 Junction 11 wrote:
royalsteve wrote:
Fat Leather Jacket wrote:They must represnt the 20 or so supporters left in the away end at final whistle.

What a bunch of fickle pansies.
couldnt believe that, 3-1 down with 12 mins to go and loads of their fickle fans left.....i mean a team at this level can score 2 goals in minutes.....
Never seen so many leave at once ... and 10 minutes to go

I have, Stadium of Light 2 seasons ago. Kits slots in the penalty and 30,000 Makems becomes about 15,000 in a little over 2 minutes. An exodus of biblical proportions. Give them credit though, I remember seeing shots of them all leaving after 20 minutes in some of the games 4 seasons ago.

lozz2601 · by **lozz2601** » 13 Nov 2006 20:51

Should someone point out to them we are actually the oldest team in the Prem?

Recent interest in football my...well....foot!

BenReadingFC · by **BenReadingFC** » 13 Nov 2006 21:52

weybridgewanderer · by **weybridgewanderer** » 13 Nov 2006 22:07

bobby m's syrup wrote:
... snip ...

IMO a new term 'Wolves Syndrome', should be coined for those nowadys mediocre sides who live in the past. Sunderland, Spurs, Southampton, any more nominations?

newcastle
man city
villa
everton

coventry
derby
leeds
birmingham
ipswich

nottingham forest

liverpool haven't won the league for 16 years, no goals from open play away from home so far this season, another candidate?

biscuitman · by **biscuitman** » 13 Nov 2006 23:42

"The Royals" Laughing Laughing Laughing . why? cos they are nearish Windsor? Slough is nearer Windsor then they are and thats urely not "Royal"!

What a thick prick

TFF · by **TFF** » 14 Nov 2006 01:23

Casually browsing the Spurs site and saw an article moaning about Keown. Obviously they don't like him much.

Bit cruel to dig out this genuine Time magazine cover though (apologies if it's a dodd but I've never seen it):

http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641 ... 14,00.html

skipper · by **skipper** » 14 Nov 2006 11:17

bobby m's syrup wrote:
IMO a new term 'Wolves Syndrome', should be coined for those nowadys mediocre sides who live in the past. Sunderland, Spurs, Southampton, any more nominations?

Nottinham Forest, Swindon, Sheffield Wednesday, Birmingham, Leicester, Ipswich Coventry...

Links

Forums

What Spurs think

Who is online