What a problem Little, Oster how does one chose ? I suppose Little has to be nº 1 choice as he is so consistent , but if Oster can get a run and is consistent what a problem for Sir Steve.doylefan wrote:loved hearing this!! joined in too in the north stand!!Woodcote Royal wrote:Well played Johnny Oster, I hope the East Stand cheering your name pleased you as much as it did me.
Unless he plays them both, Little in for Seol playing behind Doyle.Jackson Corner wrote:MOTM The premiership suits him. Remember WBA at home in the cup last season he played really well. Tough call for SC on Weds to leave him out or play Glenn.
1. Oster was man of the match yesterday.Heart and Seol wrote:Hunt and Oster "not good enough"
what are you on mate? Hunty was amazing for us last season and even better so far this one.
agree with Oster though, and i dont think he played all that well, obviously btter than usual but not exceptional
Can't agree on 2, he was given a very specific job to do, to float in behind the front 2 and get in the face of the Bolton midfield to stop them playing, something he did very well.Royalee wrote:1. Oster was man of the match yesterday.Heart and Seol wrote:Hunt and Oster "not good enough"
what are you on mate? Hunty was amazing for us last season and even better so far this one.
agree with Oster though, and i dont think he played all that well, obviously btter than usual but not exceptional
2. On both players' total performances on average, they aren't good enough to make our first team. However, both are in good form at the moment and I would like to see it continue (although I thought Hunt had a much poorer game yesterday than he has recently).
Totally agree. Hunt was everywhere on Saturday, almost playing an energetic Mick Gooding/ Parky type role of closing everything down.Stranded wrote: Can't agree on 2, he was given a very specific job to do, to float in behind the front 2 and get in the face of the Bolton midfield to stop them playing, something he did very well.
Excellent is way off: he did work very hard off the ball - but he was pretty poor when he had it. His first touch was way off.Jerry St Clair wrote:Totally agree. Hunt was everywhere on Saturday, almost playing an energetic Mick Gooding/ Parky type role of closing everything down.Stranded wrote: Can't agree on 2, he was given a very specific job to do, to float in behind the front 2 and get in the face of the Bolton midfield to stop them playing, something he did very well.
Excellent performance.
That was his downfall on Sat, he executed his instructions brilliantly but was very poor on the ball at times. He had a good game as he did use the ball very well at times, the chance he set up for Oster comes to mind immediately, but as you say at time his first touch was poor.Platypuss wrote:Excellent is way off: he did work very hard off the ball - but he was pretty poor when he had it. His first touch was way off.Jerry St Clair wrote:Totally agree. Hunt was everywhere on Saturday, almost playing an energetic Mick Gooding/ Parky type role of closing everything down.Stranded wrote: Can't agree on 2, he was given a very specific job to do, to float in behind the front 2 and get in the face of the Bolton midfield to stop them playing, something he did very well.
Excellent performance.
Hate him as a player because he's so frustrating. I was one of the boo boys last season (and stick by my opinion). I am however big enough to admit that he was exceptional on Saturday.igoe agogo wrote:At Sunderland they said Oster was a 9/10 player in 1/10 games.
I'd be happy with 8/10 in 5/10
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 228 guests