Disagree, If we get promoted he will find it hard to turn down another crack at the Prem. For what its worth, I think we are better prepared for life in the Prem now. When we went up before only Oster had Prem experience. Now, the only regular player without Prem experience (leaving aside the youngsters) is Noel Hunt. That has to make a difference. As does the departure of the dissidents - Kits, Shorey and Sonks.chandog wrote:i cant see coppell staying for next season regardless of whether we get promoted or not
Sun Tzu wrote:If it was phrased 'I can see Coppell calling it a day' then that would be fair enough.
To not be able to see him staying suggests you have your eyes shut fairly tight.
I've said before I really doubt he has given it much thought and whether he stays or goes will depend on many factors, with it being evens in my mind as to which way he decides.
And Little and Makin (or, if you refuse to count Makin, De la Cruz).M Brook wrote:When we went up before only Oster had Prem experience.chandog wrote:i cant see coppell staying for next season regardless of whether we get promoted or not
Don't think we will get to see him play, well only in the reserves on a cold Monday night!Bill Oddie's Beard wrote:Will provide good cover for Armstong if he gets injured or suspended, good deal really. The oS says he can play anywhere down the left so I just hope it won't tempt Coppell into not replacing Hunt if he goes!
Can't think of a single similarity between the Shorey signing and this one, apart from they both play left back.skipper wrote:Would sum up our transfer policy, with out it being a critisim. We do wonders with cheap / unproved talent, and i think he'd be another to add to that list. Quality player, reminds me of when Shorey first signed.
He's a competitive back up for a top Championship, but Armstrong is still No.1.gazzer, loyal royal wrote: at the moment our first choice left back even with Stretch fit and avaialble
Not better than Stretch, no. Was terrific last night though! Even a grumpy little git like you must have appreciated that.Ian Royal wrote:I really don't get all these people raving about him and saying after 4 or 5 games he's better than Armstrong, the player of the season!
Still don't think he was very good against Norwich or Birmingham and I wasn't massively impressed against Burnley either tbh.
CheapHoop Blah wrote:Can't think of a single similarity between the Shorey signing and this one, apart from they both play left back.skipper wrote:Would sum up our transfer policy, with out it being a critisim. We do wonders with cheap / unproved talent, and i think he'd be another to add to that list. Quality player, reminds me of when Shorey first signed.
I think he'd be a decent signing to be fair, but it really does depend on what's going to happen over the summer.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests