Correct - perhaps we should call them the incredible none?W&E Royal wrote:My Dad just phoned me, he isn't very reliable with rumours ....
Flip_Flop wrote:At least i don't make stuff up, where is the press conference? Or even the website advertising the text message service.
Flip_Flop wrote:just seen te new kit! This is for real!!
Blue and white hoops (obviously)
Puma badges on shoulders
Blue panels down side - so no 'full hoops'
White panel on back - not seen the lettering but assuming it will be blue (although would like to see the red back)
V neck shirt - no collar.
'greed. Three of the six are likely, but Mancienne isn't, and neither is Smith IMO.Ian Royal wrote:Can't see this happening.
Tyson & Smith?
Mancienne choosing us over Wolves?
'greedDeathy wrote:'greed. Three of the six are likely, but Mancienne isn't, and neither is Smith IMO.Ian Royal wrote:Can't see this happening.
Tyson & Smith?
Mancienne choosing us over Wolves?
rg6royal wrote:'greedDeathy wrote:'greed. Three of the six are likely, but Mancienne isn't, and neither is Smith IMO.Ian Royal wrote:Can't see this happening.
Tyson & Smith?
Mancienne choosing us over Wolves?
Firstly Chelsea are unlikely to want to help a fellow Championship team out and also the Link between Rodgers and Chelsea gives us good hope.
Er... really? Assuming you mean a fellow premiership team, Chelsea simply need to add a clause that Mancienne can't play against them while playing at Wolves. In theory he's then assisting Wolves against Chelsea's title rivals, but not against Chelsea themselves. There's every reason to do it. Think of Frazier Campbell last season and Joe Hart this coming season, for two examples off the top of my head.rg6royal wrote:'greedDeathy wrote:'greed. Three of the six are likely, but Mancienne isn't, and neither is Smith IMO.Ian Royal wrote:Can't see this happening.
Tyson & Smith?
Mancienne choosing us over Wolves?
Firstly Chelsea are unlikely to want to help a fellow Championship team out
Chelsea relegated?rg6royal wrote:'greedDeathy wrote:'greed. Three of the six are likely, but Mancienne isn't, and neither is Smith IMO.Ian Royal wrote:Can't see this happening.
Tyson & Smith?
Mancienne choosing us over Wolves?
Firstly Chelsea are unlikely to want to help a fellow Championship team out
Not sure if thats legal these days is it?RobRoyal wrote: Er... really? Assuming you mean a fellow premiership team, Chelsea simply need to add a clause that Mancienne can't play against them while playing at Wolves. In theory he's then assisting Wolves against Chelsea's title rivals, but not against Chelsea themselves. There's every reason to do it. Think of Frazier Campbell last season and Joe Hart this coming season, for two examples off the top of my head.
Quite right, its a Premier League rule that players on loan at fellow Premier League clubs cannot play against their parent club, not sure if it applies to the football league though.Southbank Old Boy wrote: Actually there might even be a league rule that loanee players cant play against their real club
I think it's a gentleman's agreement if not a rule.yappy wrote:Quite right, its a Premier League rule that players on loan at fellow Premier League clubs cannot play against their parent club, not sure if it applies to the football league though.Southbank Old Boy wrote: Actually there might even be a league rule that loanee players cant play against their real club
I'm sure it's a rule now. Aren't they classed as illegible if playing against their parent club?chilipepper91 wrote:I think it's a gentleman's agreement if not a rule.yappy wrote:Quite right, its a Premier League rule that players on loan at fellow Premier League clubs cannot play against their parent club, not sure if it applies to the football league though.Southbank Old Boy wrote: Actually there might even be a league rule that loanee players cant play against their real club
Shirley that's Jimmy Kebe - no-one can read him.gazzer, loyal royal wrote:
I'm sure it's a rule now. Aren't they classed as illegible if playing against their parent club?
It all changed after Lua-Lua scored for Portsmouth against Newcastle, while on loan from Newcastle
Focher wrote:if this happens i shall take a leisurely stroll down friar st in nothing but work shoes and black socks.
I'm not looking forward to seeing "Waitrose" tattoed across the players' chests.brendywendy, two posts later, wrote:would tie in nicely with the new shirt launch.........
Could be a lot lot lot lot lot lot worse...Baines wrote:I'm not looking forward to seeing "Waitrose" tattoed across the players' chests.

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 288 guests