WestYorksRoyal wrote:Parky did a very good job at Bolton under difficult circumstances. Nobody would have kept them up last year with everything going on; the fact he took them up and kept them up a year in the first place was a great effort. They're a similar sized club to us with a similar recent history. He won't get us playing sexy football, but how have our projects under Rodgers and Stam worked out? He understands our club and would be a great appointment.
Did we lack fight under Clement? I'm not sure that was ever the issue. Quality yes, fight - not reallySanguine wrote:When Gomes first came in, it was our fight and tenacity that immediately improved.WestYorksRoyal wrote:It needs to be the right manager though. Stable and shit isn't any use and gets us relegated. I can handle a run of bad results if I can see decent performances, fight and tenacity, because then you can reliably say results will improve. I don't see any of that here. What evidence have people seen to suggest we are going to improve?leon wrote:Can we stop sacking managers?
Seriously we need to give the manager a chance, surely?
Near the end we did I'd say. Thought it looked pretty obvious he had lost the players and a few of them downed tools. Certainly in his first few games there was a change in attitude but that is normally the case when a new manager comes in.Hound wrote:Did we lack fight under Clement? I'm not sure that was ever the issue. Quality yes, fight - not reallySanguine wrote:When Gomes first came in, it was our fight and tenacity that immediately improved.WestYorksRoyal wrote: It needs to be the right manager though. Stable and shit isn't any use and gets us relegated. I can handle a run of bad results if I can see decent performances, fight and tenacity, because then you can reliably say results will improve. I don't see any of that here. What evidence have people seen to suggest we are going to improve?
Clement's games had plenty of fight aside from the odd shocker, which Gomes had too (Sheff Utd anyone??)Hound wrote:Did we lack fight under Clement? I'm not sure that was ever the issue. Quality yes, fight - not reallySanguine wrote:When Gomes first came in, it was our fight and tenacity that immediately improved.WestYorksRoyal wrote: It needs to be the right manager though. Stable and shit isn't any use and gets us relegated. I can handle a run of bad results if I can see decent performances, fight and tenacity, because then you can reliably say results will improve. I don't see any of that here. What evidence have people seen to suggest we are going to improve?
I cba to get completely back through but weren't some of his last games Leeds 1-0 away (missed last min pen) and Stoke 2-2 (last minute equaliser)Old Man Andrews wrote:Near the end we did I'd say. Thought it looked pretty obvious he had lost the players and a few of them downed tools. Certainly in his first few games there was a change in attitude but that is normally the case when a new manager comes in.Hound wrote:Did we lack fight under Clement? I'm not sure that was ever the issue. Quality yes, fight - not reallySanguine wrote:
When Gomes first came in, it was our fight and tenacity that immediately improved.
Well he looks young....its the hair......and the INXS influence....Hound wrote:In for someone who is 46 being 'young'
Yep, but he has to show he's identified the problems and is trying to solve them.Zip wrote:Gomes deserves more time but he has to change our awful style of play.
Good read.
He is spot on I think and its well written and worrying for us fans.2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:Good read.
Agree with a lot of it, especially the Richards Obita swap. Totally bizarre.
Not sure I agree with the likes of Olise, Barrett or having Rino AND Pele on etc but what we think of individual players wasn't necessarily your or my point, it's about consistency. Rotation seemingly just for the sake of it I find odd, and the players will find confusing and disheartening.
But is just not true?Ascotexgunner wrote:It's worrying for us fans.2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:Good read.
Agree with a lot of it, especially the Richards Obita swap. Totally bizarre.
Not sure I agree with the likes of Olise, Barrett or having Rino AND Pele on etc but what we think of individual players wasn't necessarily your or my point, it's about consistency. Rotation seemingly just for the sake of it I find odd, and the players will find confusing and disheartening.
The youngsters just are not getting a go.
Actually yes he is playing a lot of youngsters tbf.Denver Royal wrote:Sounds dramatic, but is just not true?Ascotexgunner wrote:It's worrying for us fans.2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:
Good read.
Agree with a lot of it, especially the Richards Obita swap. Totally bizarre.
Not sure I agree with the likes of Olise, Barrett or having Rino AND Pele on etc but what we think of individual players wasn't necessarily your or my point, it's about consistency. Rotation seemingly just for the sake of it I find odd, and the players will find confusing and disheartening.
The youngsters just are not getting a go.
Rino, McIntyre, Barrett, Richards, and 17 year old Olise. He tried to play Virginia, but he wasn't ready.
Who else should be getting a go? Loader, who people moan about (on and off the pitch), and who doesn't have a position, etc. Who else?
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Wisconsin Royal and 1091 guests