by Forbury Lion » 28 Oct 2025 14:59
28 Oct 2025 14:59by Brogue » 28 Oct 2025 15:03
28 Oct 2025 15:03by mikey_1871 » 28 Oct 2025 15:11
28 Oct 2025 15:11How has anyone been 'brainwashed' - we've heard nothing from Couhig specifc to Richardson, and won't until he's formally appointed. The responses on here are far more measured than those having a tantrum on twitter.Brogue wrote:christ, you lot really have been brainwashed by Couhig haven't you? this is a disaster of an appointment - the cheapest available option. We are now in a very real battle against relegation. He will be gone by February/March
by Brogue » 28 Oct 2025 15:17
28 Oct 2025 15:17Win % of his past five seasons:mikey_1871 wrote:How has anyone been 'brainwashed' - we've heard nothing from Couhig specifc to Richardson, and won't until he's formally appointed. The responses on here are far more measured than those having a tantrum on twitter.Brogue wrote:christ, you lot really have been brainwashed by Couhig haven't you? this is a disaster of an appointment - the cheapest available option. We are now in a very real battle against relegation. He will be gone by February/March
I can't speak for anyone else, but seems a solid appointment to me. A solid track record in the league we're in - including a league title - and good to see us appoint someone with experience of getting promtoed from League 1. The proof will of course be in our performances/results, but I see no reason to throw the toys out of the pram with this appointment. Your comments on relegation and him being gone are simply without merit.
by Linden Jones' Tash » 28 Oct 2025 15:23
28 Oct 2025 15:23by morganb » 28 Oct 2025 15:24
28 Oct 2025 15:24by mikey_1871 » 28 Oct 2025 15:46
28 Oct 2025 15:46Sorry, but win percentages relating to different teams and different leagues are of no concern to me and are not a fair indicator. The top two you state are in the Championship (one with the Wigan team he'd taken up and one with an awful Rotherham team he inherited) and are pretty irrelevant as very different circumstances to us.Brogue wrote:Win % of his past five seasons:mikey_1871 wrote:How has anyone been 'brainwashed' - we've heard nothing from Couhig specifc to Richardson, and won't until he's formally appointed. The responses on here are far more measured than those having a tantrum on twitter.Brogue wrote:christ, you lot really have been brainwashed by Couhig haven't you? this is a disaster of an appointment - the cheapest available option. We are now in a very real battle against relegation. He will be gone by February/March
I can't speak for anyone else, but seems a solid appointment to me. A solid track record in the league we're in - including a league title - and good to see us appoint someone with experience of getting promtoed from League 1. The proof will of course be in our performances/results, but I see no reason to throw the toys out of the pram with this appointment. Your comments on relegation and him being gone are simply without merit.
8.7% - 2 wins in 23
25% - 5 wins in 20
58.7% - 27 wins in 46
32% - 11 wins in 34
27% - 9 wins in 33
if we win 30% of our remaining fixtures (which is his average win % over his last 5 seasons) there are 32 games remaining, that's 9 wins. 27 points. we are on 15 points - gives 42 points. we'd be looking for another 8 draws to get to the magic 50 from the remaining 21 games. of course the 30% is vastly swayed by his one good season. any less than 30% and we are in deep shit.
by Brogue » 28 Oct 2025 15:50
28 Oct 2025 15:50mikey_1871 wrote:an awful Rotherham team he inheritedBrogue wrote:Win % of his past five seasons:mikey_1871 wrote:
How has anyone been 'brainwashed' - we've heard nothing from Couhig specifc to Richardson, and won't until he's formally appointed. The responses on here are far more measured than those having a tantrum on twitter.
I can't speak for anyone else, but seems a solid appointment to me. A solid track record in the league we're in - including a league title - and good to see us appoint someone with experience of getting promtoed from League 1. The proof will of course be in our performances/results, but I see no reason to throw the toys out of the pram with this appointment. Your comments on relegation and him being gone are simply without merit.
8.7% - 2 wins in 23
25% - 5 wins in 20
58.7% - 27 wins in 46
32% - 11 wins in 34
27% - 9 wins in 33
if we win 30% of our remaining fixtures (which is his average win % over his last 5 seasons) there are 32 games remaining, that's 9 wins. 27 points. we are on 15 points - gives 42 points. we'd be looking for another 8 draws to get to the magic 50 from the remaining 21 games. of course the 30% is vastly swayed by his one good season. any less than 30% and we are in deep shit.
by Stranded » 28 Oct 2025 15:53
28 Oct 2025 15:53The last 2 of those seasons of course being at a higher level with a) a Wigan team having cash issues and b) a Rotherham squad that was nowhere near good enough for the division it was in - still a poor record there of course.Brogue wrote:Win % of his past five seasons:mikey_1871 wrote:How has anyone been 'brainwashed' - we've heard nothing from Couhig specifc to Richardson, and won't until he's formally appointed. The responses on here are far more measured than those having a tantrum on twitter.Brogue wrote:christ, you lot really have been brainwashed by Couhig haven't you? this is a disaster of an appointment - the cheapest available option. We are now in a very real battle against relegation. He will be gone by February/March
I can't speak for anyone else, but seems a solid appointment to me. A solid track record in the league we're in - including a league title - and good to see us appoint someone with experience of getting promtoed from League 1. The proof will of course be in our performances/results, but I see no reason to throw the toys out of the pram with this appointment. Your comments on relegation and him being gone are simply without merit.
8.7% - 2 wins in 23
25% - 5 wins in 20
58.7% - 27 wins in 46
32% - 11 wins in 34
27% - 9 wins in 33
if we win 30% of our remaining fixtures (which is his average win % over his last 5 seasons) there are 32 games remaining, that's 9 wins. 27 points. we are on 15 points - gives 42 points. we'd be looking for another 8 draws to get to the magic 50 from the remaining 21 games. of course the 30% is vastly swayed by his one good season. any less than 30% and we are in deep shit.
He just hasn't though, has he?Brogue wrote:mikey_1871 wrote:an awful Rotherham team he inheritedBrogue wrote:
Win % of his past five seasons:
8.7% - 2 wins in 23
25% - 5 wins in 20
58.7% - 27 wins in 46
32% - 11 wins in 34
27% - 9 wins in 33
if we win 30% of our remaining fixtures (which is his average win % over his last 5 seasons) there are 32 games remaining, that's 9 wins. 27 points. we are on 15 points - gives 42 points. we'd be looking for another 8 draws to get to the magic 50 from the remaining 21 games. of course the 30% is vastly swayed by his one good season. any less than 30% and we are in deep shit.
He's inherited an awful team here too
by morganb » 28 Oct 2025 16:02
28 Oct 2025 16:02So why haven't they? Why has he been unemployed for ages?Stranded wrote:The last 2 of those seasons of course being at a higher level with a) a Wigan team having cash issues and b) a Rotherham squad that was nowhere near good enough for the division it was in - still a poor record there of course.Brogue wrote:Win % of his past five seasons:mikey_1871 wrote:
How has anyone been 'brainwashed' - we've heard nothing from Couhig specifc to Richardson, and won't until he's formally appointed. The responses on here are far more measured than those having a tantrum on twitter.
I can't speak for anyone else, but seems a solid appointment to me. A solid track record in the league we're in - including a league title - and good to see us appoint someone with experience of getting promtoed from League 1. The proof will of course be in our performances/results, but I see no reason to throw the toys out of the pram with this appointment. Your comments on relegation and him being gone are simply without merit.
8.7% - 2 wins in 23
25% - 5 wins in 20
58.7% - 27 wins in 46
32% - 11 wins in 34
27% - 9 wins in 33
if we win 30% of our remaining fixtures (which is his average win % over his last 5 seasons) there are 32 games remaining, that's 9 wins. 27 points. we are on 15 points - gives 42 points. we'd be looking for another 8 draws to get to the magic 50 from the remaining 21 games. of course the 30% is vastly swayed by his one good season. any less than 30% and we are in deep shit.
This can of course also be split as:
League 1 - 47.5% - 37 wins in 80
Championship - 16.3% 7 wins in 43
Based on that win record at this level, most people would be falling over themselves to employ a manager with that record.
by Brogue » 28 Oct 2025 16:04
28 Oct 2025 16:04+1morganb wrote:So why haven't they? Why has he been unemployed for ages?Stranded wrote:The last 2 of those seasons of course being at a higher level with a) a Wigan team having cash issues and b) a Rotherham squad that was nowhere near good enough for the division it was in - still a poor record there of course.Brogue wrote:
Win % of his past five seasons:
8.7% - 2 wins in 23
25% - 5 wins in 20
58.7% - 27 wins in 46
32% - 11 wins in 34
27% - 9 wins in 33
if we win 30% of our remaining fixtures (which is his average win % over his last 5 seasons) there are 32 games remaining, that's 9 wins. 27 points. we are on 15 points - gives 42 points. we'd be looking for another 8 draws to get to the magic 50 from the remaining 21 games. of course the 30% is vastly swayed by his one good season. any less than 30% and we are in deep shit.
This can of course also be split as:
League 1 - 47.5% - 37 wins in 80
Championship - 16.3% 7 wins in 43
Based on that win record at this level, most people would be falling over themselves to employ a manager with that record.
by Vision » 28 Oct 2025 16:09
28 Oct 2025 16:09I make it 9 games until January 1st.WestYorksRoyal wrote:I'd be concerned. We're 19th, with how many games until January when the window opens?Sutekh wrote:This.Hound wrote:
If even the AI is accurate I’ve no particular issue with this. I think we’re way too lightweight at the moment, esp up front. But it’d need different players to come in from what we have currently
A key criteria has to be pragmatism to work with what we have effectively, even if they may have a different vision for the team on a 12 - 18 month horizon.
by Brogue » 28 Oct 2025 16:10
28 Oct 2025 16:10well, we are 19th in the table, 3 wins in 14. People are saying hunt wasn't the problem and we shouldn't have sacked him. So if Hunt wasn't the problem....Hendo wrote:He just hasn't though, has he?Brogue wrote:mikey_1871 wrote:
an awful Rotherham team he inherited
He's inherited an awful team here too
by Extended-Phenotype » 28 Oct 2025 16:15
28 Oct 2025 16:15Yet we're only 9 points off the play-offs and a win in our next game could see us jump up to 12th.Brogue wrote:well, we are 19th in the table, 3 wins in 14. People are saying hunt wasn't the problem and we shouldn't have sacked him. So if Hunt wasn't the problem....Hendo wrote:He just hasn't though, has he?Brogue wrote:
He's inherited an awful team here too
think we are vastly overestimating the quality of the squad.
by Brogue » 28 Oct 2025 16:32
28 Oct 2025 16:32Just out of interest what has he done right.? Not trying to be contrary, but in his first 6 months what’s he done right?. And I get all the steadying the ship financially, I’m not interested in all that, that’s a given and something any new owner would have done. I’m on about the day to day operational decisions of running a football club. What are his achievements so far.Extended-Phenotype wrote:I mean, it isn’t particularly cultist to believe the owners, privy to 99% more information than the average fan while wanting pretty much the same thing in terms of success, might sign a decent candidate.
If that’s Leam Richardson, fine. I get that what the owners want/can spend doesn’t always align with what the fans demand we spend, but it’s not really in their best interests to sign any old oxf*rd just because they are cheap. There must be something about him. I’m sure his record came up in conversation, and perhaps the owners think the some eras are more relevant than others.
The charge that people are “brainwashed” in favour of Couhig seems conversely applicable to those who preemptively insist he can do no right.
Users browsing this forum: 78royal, Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 887 guests