SCORENo Fixed Abode wrote:Ideal wrote:Chelsea's chances of winning the Champions League are similar to that of Wizard bedding Sofia Vergara.
SCORENo Fixed Abode wrote:Ideal wrote:Chelsea's chances of winning the Champions League are similar to that of Wizard bedding Sofia Vergara.
Just watch it on tv m9, why break the habit of a lifetimeNo Fixed Abode wrote:Too hungover for that shenanigans.soggy biscuit wrote:Posting from the bus parade, impressive.
Didn't make a dent in the North's body count thought.......Victor Meldrew wrote:Chelsea probably the dullest side to win the Champs League (cup)since Red Star Belgrade who also played for penalties.
Wasn't it 17-1 on corners supremacy just like in the game away at Barcelona where IIRC Chelsea may have had 2 corners to their 20 or so?
Corners don't win matches of course (although Chelsea scored their goal from their first corner in the 87th minute)but it gives a good indication of how a game has gone.
Abramovich looked bored to tears during the game and must have wondered how much more money he will have to shell out to get entertaining football.
This was a Wimbledon-type performance where the lesser club packed their defence and just hoped that they might sneak a goal so their tactics are vindicated but I think Roman must have wondered why he had shellled out all that money over the years just to end up watching that dross.
On another night Bayern Munich might have scored at least 6,.just like Barcelona might in each of the semis,and who would have thought that both Messi and Robben would miss penalties that could have sealed both games?
Great credit though for the defensive discipline,3 great performances from Cech and from Drogba-what a player he is and even at 34 lasted the 120 minutes and some.
As for Terry joining in,I wouldn't disagree with that because medals were given to the squad rather than just those that played on the night.
So that's now for European Cups won:-
The North 8
The Midlands 3
Scotland 1
London 1
Those "big" clubs from London,Arsenal,Chelsea and Spurs have a bit of leeway to make up but I suppose it's a start.
You know my beef is with Liverpool fans who choose to be selective about history. If a club is going to bang on about things it did in the past it needs to be humble as well as proud.cmonurz wrote:Pretty pathetic, Mr Avon Royal.
+1Avon Royal wrote:You know my beef is with Liverpool fans who choose to be selective about history. If a club is going to bang on about things it did in the past it needs to be humble as well as proud.cmonurz wrote:Pretty pathetic, Mr Avon Royal.
Finishing is one of the biggest parts of football, so whilst Munich had more of the ball, had ten-fold more chances, and were the better team to watch, they still only scored one goal across the whole 120 minutes.Victor Meldrew wrote:This was a Wimbledon-type performance where the lesser club packed their defence and just hoped that they might sneak a goal so their tactics are vindicated but I think Roman must have wondered why he had shellled out all that money over the years just to end up watching that dross.
On another night Bayern Munich might have scored at least 6,.just like Barcelona might in each of the semis,and who would have thought that both Messi and Robben would miss penalties that could have sealed both games?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests