Sadly not unusual for lower league clubs to negotiate those sort of clauses to try and reduce the initial spend. Personally think those sort of clauses, like many add-on clauses, should be banned as it can just encourage stupid club spending and stack up issues down the line for badly run basket case clubsStranded wrote:Yep, looks that way. Attitude definitely stinks but also wouldn't surprise me if there is a clause somewhere in his deal that we have to play Liverpool X if he makes a certain amount of apperances. He's on 72 apps since signing permanently - clause at 75?
Total conspiracy theory but we do have previous in that respect and when money is non-existant, you aren't going to waste it on a player you clearly don't trust or want anymore.
I used to think this with certain players e.g. Liam Moore last season, that's partly why I thought he wouldn't play for us again and the club hid behind that.Stranded wrote:Yep, looks that way. Attitude definitely stinks but also wouldn't surprise me if there is a clause somewhere in his deal that we have to play Liverpool X if he makes a certain amount of apperances. He's on 72 apps since signing permanently - clause at 75?
Total conspiracy theory but we do have previous in that respect and when money is non-existant, you aren't going to waste it on a player you clearly don't trust or want anymore.
I remember the constant comparisons to Eze. One has become an established Prem player in and around the England squad and the other can’t get into the 24th place side in L1. Speaks volumesSnowflake Royal wrote:Thoughts and prayers with RR, Orion and Hound at this most difficult of times for them.
Think 2025 is the year to panicSnowflake Royal wrote:How long are the contracts of him, Button and CBC?
I know Pereira is one year.
Andresson/Button, CBC and Norfolk/Collins should be fine for L2.
Sadly this is true, Heard this on Sunday, from people who know his family.Brogue wrote:I’ve been told Ballard is out for the season btw acl
From our side, shame, looked like him and Smith could form a decent parthership up top. From his side, hope he makes a speedy recovery - he is young enough that a full recovery should be possible unless it is very severe damage.Wycombe Royal wrote:Sadly this is true, Heard this on Sunday, from people who know his family.Brogue wrote:I’ve been told Ballard is out for the season btw acl
Hopefully he makes a full recovery and it doesn't get stop his development, as he clearly has a lot of talent and potential.
Wonder if that means Reading will bring someone else in in January, or sooner if there is there a worthwhile free agent still out there.Stranded wrote:From our side, shame, looked like him and Smith could form a decent parthership up top. From his side, hope he makes a speedy recovery - he is young enough that a full recovery should be possible unless it is very severe damage.Wycombe Royal wrote:Sadly this is true, Heard this on Sunday, from people who know his family.Brogue wrote:I’ve been told Ballard is out for the season btw acl
Hopefully he makes a full recovery and it doesn't get stop his development, as he clearly has a lot of talent and potential.
I had really high hopes for Ballard and could only see him improving as the season progressed. It’s a real shame about his injury.Sutekh wrote:Wonder if that means Reading will bring someone else in in January, or sooner if there is there a worthwhile free agent still out there.Stranded wrote:From our side, shame, looked like him and Smith could form a decent parthership up top. From his side, hope he makes a speedy recovery - he is young enough that a full recovery should be possible unless it is very severe damage.Wycombe Royal wrote: Sadly this is true, Heard this on Sunday, from people who know his family.
Hopefully he makes a full recovery and it doesn't get stop his development, as he clearly has a lot of talent and potential.
Need to not be under embargo for 5 mins for that to happen. Also will depend on if we are on the hook for Ballard's wages and for how long. Imagine there is an automatic break in case of bad injury.Hound wrote:Real shame for Ballard. Kid certainly has something about him and I liked his attitude- always positive, worked hard etc. hopefully a simple enough injury and he’s young enough to bounce back quickly
From our pov I do think a more experienced striker who could genuinely step in for Smith is a better option. Someone quite physical. Still plenty of free agents about
That's easyStranded wrote:Need to not be under embargo for 5 mins for that to happen. Also will depend on if we are on the hook for Ballard's wages and for how long. Imagine there is an automatic break in case of bad injury.Hound wrote:Real shame for Ballard. Kid certainly has something about him and I liked his attitude- always positive, worked hard etc. hopefully a simple enough injury and he’s young enough to bounce back quickly
From our pov I do think a more experienced striker who could genuinely step in for Smith is a better option. Someone quite physical. Still plenty of free agents about
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Irvinchangeyaname, Royals and Racers, stealthpapes, zaskar and 30 guests