Long every day of the week. You can't play Portsmouth away with only one striker putting in decent work.Tamworth_Royal wrote:Just one question though, Long or Lita for Pompey ?
Long every day of the week. You can't play Portsmouth away with only one striker putting in decent work.Tamworth_Royal wrote:Just one question though, Long or Lita for Pompey ?
Royalee wrote:Long every day of the week. You can't play Portsmouth away with only one striker putting in decent work.Tamworth_Royal wrote:Just one question though, Long or Lita for Pompey ?
I've been to every league game this season. Twat. If you'd been to every game this season (and taking your head out of your a*se in the process of doing so you little prick), you'd see that against Arsenal on Sunday, we'd had far more attacking play than against West Ham, Chelsea and Man Utd put together. The reason for this? Two hardworking strikers are always better than one doing the job of two.MC ROYAL wrote:Royalee wrote:Long every day of the week. You can't play Portsmouth away with only one striker putting in decent work.Tamworth_Royal wrote:Just one question though, Long or Lita for Pompey ?
I guess you didnt see the game then? Twat.
Lita to start with Doyle.
There is no way you can question Lita's work rate. If he didn't put in the effort he would not be playing at all. Or do you have extra knowledge that Coppell is unaware of?Royalee wrote:I've been to every league game this season. Twat. If you'd been to every game this season (and taking your head out of your a*se in the process of doing so you little prick), you'd see that against Arsenal on Sunday, we'd had far more attacking play than against West Ham, Chelsea and Man Utd put together. The reason for this? Two hardworking strikers are always better than one doing the job of two.MC ROYAL wrote:Royalee wrote: Long every day of the week. You can't play Portsmouth away with only one striker putting in decent work.
I guess you didnt see the game then? Twat.
Lita to start with Doyle.
Yea when Kitson is fit, until then we can't afford to not start him.alad wrote:Lita's finishing this season has been woeful aswell. A sustained spell on the bench will do him good.
Yes he dropped him for 1 game and there could be many reasons for it, not necessarily down to lack of effort.Royalee wrote:Lita's workrate has been so poor that Coppell dropped him for a player unproven in the Championship in one of our biggest games of the season on Sunday. I think Coppell knows about it, don't you?
I like your thinking on this one.............79Royal wrote:For me, I think it's time we went with the 4-5-1 formation, especially away from home.
I'd go with (left to right) Seol, Harper, Sidwell, Oster, Little in midfield, with Doyle up front. If Doyle could hold the ball up enough, I reckon we'd have enough runners from midfiled to cause problems in attack.
we got more chances in the las t 10 mins than in the rest of the game once we went to 4-5-1. what the hell game were you watching because it wasn't Reading v Arsenal.Kitsondinho wrote:4-5-1 is madness!!! Do we want to be in the situation we were in the 2nd half on sunday, ie every time we get the ball back we pump it long to doyle who amazingly gets beaten by the two 2 or 3 defends around him. It worked really well though didn't it. Yes we had a whole two isolated chances, but did we ever look like sustaining that pressure? no, because we never had the ball. Its bad enough trying to play Arsenal without kicking the ball to Kolo Toure every 2 mins!
did we score without it v arsenal? did Lehman have to make a save without it? have we been creating anywhere near enough chances without it?Kitsondinho wrote:I'm sure it was Royals V Arsenal, I'll check the fixtures. 4-5-1 is a mad idea. Doyle cannot be expected to run the line up front on his own against prem defences. I want to see us continue to play pressing footbal and not run scared of the opp. 4-5-1 is the sort of formation that earns you a boring 0-0 draw. Did we score by playing it yesterday? Did we score against Arsenal? Did Lehman even have to make a save when we changed to it? I think the answer may just be no to all 3.
I think the idea would be to stop the whacking it at the centre backs and start to pass the ball a bit more using the extra player in midfield.Kitsondinho wrote:4-5-1 is madness!!! Do we want to be in the situation we were in the 2nd half on sunday, ie every time we get the ball back we pump it long to doyle who amazingly gets beaten by the two 2 or 3 defends around him. It worked really well though didn't it. Yes we had a whole two isolated chances, but did we ever look like sustaining that pressure? no, because we never had the ball. Its bad enough trying to play Arsenal without kicking the ball to Kolo Toure every 2 mins!
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], englishman in VLC, Google [Bot], windermereROYAL and 124 guests