Is this the new shirt, Kes?No Fixed Abode wrote:

Is it? And I'm genuinely not being funny because he posted it. Just, it's boring?Friday's Legacy wrote:it is nice mind.
sometimes less is more.URZZ wrote:Is it? And I'm genuinely not being funny because he posted it. Just, it's boring?Friday's Legacy wrote:it is nice mind.
Hence why I said:who are ya? wrote:Boring kits are the best. The more plain, the better. Just make a bog standard blue and white hooped shirt, white shorts, white socks with blue trim. Bob's your Dad's brother and we have ourselves a proper kit
Still, even simple kits can be far from boring, and that is boring and crap.URZZ wrote:Red numbers and lettering on back of the shirts, white shorts, white socks with two blue hoops below the knee, then we'd have a kit. It does make you realise though how much better our kit would be if we had either Adidas or Nike creating it. (Preferably Adidas).
Give it a few seasons... wish RFC would read this thread!
No Fixed Abode wrote:
urz13 wrote:It is an actual pic?

LOL! So you've made the Waitrose far too big and moved it down a touch, slightly changed the blue and changed the colour of the puma sign. Was it really worth it?Thomas L'Heureux wrote:Thought I'd make Kes' mock-up look a bit more realistic. Not too shabby:
As did last season's shirt tbfroadrunner wrote:Yours looked like a 6 year old did it, NFA
Good point. Maybe Kes is ITK.That Friday Feeling wrote:As did last season's shirt tbfroadrunner wrote:Yours looked like a 6 year old did it, NFA
It took me about 4 minutes m8. Don't get so defensive, eh?No Fixed Abode wrote:LOL! So you've made the Waitrose far too big and moved it down a touch, slightly changed the blue and changed the colour of the puma sign. Was it really worth it?Thomas L'Heureux wrote:Thought I'd make Kes' mock-up look a bit more realistic. Not too shabby:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests