The referee certainly was out of his depthSouthDownsRoyal wrote:Was the ref to blame?
That’s Pince usual scapegoat
He'll be solid in league one and help us challenge for the playoffsSnowflake Royal wrote:That's a shocking signing.
I must admit that I wanted us to sign him but I’ve not been impressed so far. 4 years is a oxf*rd long deal but maybe his better days are yet to come. If we go down I’d look at Van Veen at Motherwell as a striker option.Sutekh wrote:Yes, Reading are the proud owners of Naby Sarr until June 2026.Snowflake Royal wrote:FOUR YEARS?!?Royal_jimmy wrote:
Sarr was dreadful. Nearly gave 2 goals away from mistakes that a better side would have taken. He should have got a 2 year deal at best, we're stuck with him for 4 years. He's poor.
He's 29, his best footballing days are behind him.blythspartan wrote:I must admit that I wanted us to sign him but I’ve not been impressed so far. 4 years is a oxf*rd long deal but maybe his better days are yet to come. If we go down I’d look at Van Veen at Motherwell as a striker option.Sutekh wrote:Yes, Reading are the proud owners of Naby Sarr until June 2026.Snowflake Royal wrote: FOUR YEARS?!?
Agree that 4 years seems excessive, but that may have been the price to pay for getting anyone at all given the other constraints that we now have knowledge ofSnowflake Royal wrote:He's 29, his best footballing days are behind him.blythspartan wrote:I must admit that I wanted us to sign him but I’ve not been impressed so far. 4 years is a oxf*rd long deal but maybe his better days are yet to come. If we go down I’d look at Van Veen at Motherwell as a striker option.Sutekh wrote:
Yes, Reading are the proud owners of Naby Sarr until June 2026.
You're a club in financial difficulty, expected to struggle against relegation. Do you:
Sign a 29 year old centreback who has generally played for teams struggling at the bottom for 4 years having just spent the last few years stuck with a bunch of overpaid failures on long contracts, or
Not do that?
At the same time do you sign a 31 year old who has never played above L2 to be your reserve keeper on a 3 year deal, blocking your well rated youth keepers from your Academy conveyor belt, or
Not do that?
Sarr should probably be ok in L1 though.
Hi Paul InceFranchise FC wrote:The referee certainly was out of his depthSouthDownsRoyal wrote:Was the ref to blame?
That’s Pince usual scapegoat
Do you not think so ?SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Hi Paul InceFranchise FC wrote:The referee certainly was out of his depthSouthDownsRoyal wrote:Was the ref to blame?
That’s Pince usual scapegoat
He indeed was but probably no more so than our 'Manager' and coaching team.Franchise FC wrote:Do you not think so ?SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Hi Paul InceFranchise FC wrote: The referee certainly was out of his depth
Sarr a rock apart from the time when he inexcusably crumbled to pieces at a critical point and left their guy with a completely free header in the centre of the box.paultheroyal wrote:Excellent atmosphere yesterday and crowd were behind the team. Just th frustrated boos at the end.
That fan shat himself at the end and was seen Scurrying to the toilets at the end of the match. Didn’t quite go to plan for him and well done on Carroll coming over.
As for what’s on the pitch, it’s just an ugly mess. No plan, no cohesion, it’s just a mishap of styles.
Meite had such a poor game. Fornah is scared to cross and he as lost out on the left. Sarr a rock, caroll and Joao could work together. Azeez needs to start.
Is that the guy being marked throughout the rest of the game by Holmes ?RoyalBlue wrote:Sarr a rock apart from the time when he inexcusably crumbled to pieces at a critical point and left their guy with a completely free header in the centre of the box.paultheroyal wrote:Excellent atmosphere yesterday and crowd were behind the team. Just th frustrated boos at the end.
That fan shat himself at the end and was seen Scurrying to the toilets at the end of the match. Didn’t quite go to plan for him and well done on Carroll coming over.
As for what’s on the pitch, it’s just an ugly mess. No plan, no cohesion, it’s just a mishap of styles.
Meite had such a poor game. Fornah is scared to cross and he as lost out on the left. Sarr a rock, caroll and Joao could work together. Azeez needs to start.
Basically what you're saying is Holmes kept him quiet and the one time Sarr had to do something he failed?Franchise FC wrote:Is that the guy being marked throughout the rest of the game by Holmes ?RoyalBlue wrote:Sarr a rock apart from the time when he inexcusably crumbled to pieces at a critical point and left their guy with a completely free header in the centre of the box.paultheroyal wrote:Excellent atmosphere yesterday and crowd were behind the team. Just th frustrated boos at the end.
That fan shat himself at the end and was seen Scurrying to the toilets at the end of the match. Didn’t quite go to plan for him and well done on Carroll coming over.
As for what’s on the pitch, it’s just an ugly mess. No plan, no cohesion, it’s just a mishap of styles.
Meite had such a poor game. Fornah is scared to cross and he as lost out on the left. Sarr a rock, caroll and Joao could work together. Azeez needs to start.
Basically, what I’m saying, from a position of actually being at the game not just listening on the radio, that Holmes was man for man throughout the game, loses his man to concede the goal and Sarr gets the blame.Snowflake Royal wrote:Basically what you're saying is Holmes kept him quiet and the one time Sarr had to do something he failed?Franchise FC wrote:Is that the guy being marked throughout the rest of the game by Holmes ?RoyalBlue wrote:
Sarr a rock apart from the time when he inexcusably crumbled to pieces at a critical point and left their guy with a completely free header in the centre of the box.
A good centreback doesn’t follow their man all over the pitch ignoring everything else. They have zones of responsibility to maintain shape and organisation.
I was watching the game thanks. And just to make sure, I've re-watched the highlights, and it turns out being at the game apparently doesn't help. Because you've got it completely wrong.Franchise FC wrote:Basically, what I’m saying, from a position of actually being at the game not just listening on the radio, that Holmes was man for man throughout the game, loses his man to concede the goal and Sarr gets the blame.Snowflake Royal wrote:Basically what you're saying is Holmes kept him quiet and the one time Sarr had to do something he failed?Franchise FC wrote: Is that the guy being marked throughout the rest of the game by Holmes ?
A good centreback doesn’t follow their man all over the pitch ignoring everything else. They have zones of responsibility to maintain shape and organisation.
Holmes had a very good game, but that was his responsibility
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 714 guests