Did he really say that about Rosenior ? Kelly or Hunt maybe but I don't recall him mentioning Rosenior. As a right footer he looked out of his depth at right midfield let alone left back.Southbank Old Boy wrote:That would be great excuse for us not getting in a replacement though.
Non-commital statement from the club saying how unavoidable circumstances resulting in key targets falling through and so we're happy with what we're left with, ie Hunt or Rosenoir at left back
Interestingly there was an interview on BBC Berks last night with Nicky Hammond. In that he kind of said that Coppell was happy to play either of the above at left back but that they're working behind the scenes to give him further alternatives. The way he said it was as if they were having to work hard to convince Coppell that there was a left back out there good enough and available.
As a defender he looked out of his depth at right midfield. He played at left back for Fulham and supposedly did a good job.Chuckle Brother wrote:Did he really say that about Rosenior ? Kelly or Hunt maybe but I don't recall him mentioning Rosenior. As a right footer he looked out of his depth at right midfield let alone left back.Southbank Old Boy wrote:That would be great excuse for us not getting in a replacement though.
Non-commital statement from the club saying how unavoidable circumstances resulting in key targets falling through and so we're happy with what we're left with, ie Hunt or Rosenoir at left back
Interestingly there was an interview on BBC Berks last night with Nicky Hammond. In that he kind of said that Coppell was happy to play either of the above at left back but that they're working behind the scenes to give him further alternatives. The way he said it was as if they were having to work hard to convince Coppell that there was a left back out there good enough and available.
Hammond mentioned Rosenoir by name as one of the alternatives that Coppell would be happy with. How happy I've no idea, but the way Hammond said it was as if Coppell would be fine playing him there.Chuckle Brother wrote:Did he really say that about Rosenior ? Kelly or Hunt maybe but I don't recall him mentioning Rosenior. As a right footer he looked out of his depth at right midfield let alone left back.Southbank Old Boy wrote:That would be great excuse for us not getting in a replacement though.
Non-commital statement from the club saying how unavoidable circumstances resulting in key targets falling through and so we're happy with what we're left with, ie Hunt or Rosenoir at left back
Interestingly there was an interview on BBC Berks last night with Nicky Hammond. In that he kind of said that Coppell was happy to play either of the above at left back but that they're working behind the scenes to give him further alternatives. The way he said it was as if they were having to work hard to convince Coppell that there was a left back out there good enough and available.
Like the last two summers, yes.Chuckle Brother wrote:So is it fair to say the general consensus then is that there are probably some half hearted moves going on in the background but they are getting their excuses in early for if/when it doesn't happen ?
4.5 million for scott brownStreets wrote:Like the last two summers, yes.Chuckle Brother wrote:So is it fair to say the general consensus then is that there are probably some half hearted moves going on in the background but they are getting their excuses in early for if/when it doesn't happen ?
Not full-hearted enough, especially this close season.brendywendy wrote:4.5 million for scott brownStreets wrote:Like the last two summers, yes.Chuckle Brother wrote:So is it fair to say the general consensus then is that there are probably some half hearted moves going on in the background but they are getting their excuses in early for if/when it doesn't happen ?
4 m euros for mensah
fae, halford 2M+
halfhearted?
£3.5m for Lescott, £1.5m for Whitehead, £2m for Matt Kilgallionbrendywendy wrote:4.5 million for scott brownStreets wrote:Like the last two summers, yes.Chuckle Brother wrote:So is it fair to say the general consensus then is that there are probably some half hearted moves going on in the background but they are getting their excuses in early for if/when it doesn't happen ?
4 m euros for mensah
fae, halford 2M+
halfhearted?
Um, did we actually get Mensah and Brown?brendywendy wrote:4.5 million for scott brownStreets wrote:Like the last two summers, yes.Chuckle Brother wrote:So is it fair to say the general consensus then is that there are probably some half hearted moves going on in the background but they are getting their excuses in early for if/when it doesn't happen ?
4 m euros for mensah
fae, halford 2M+
halfhearted?
Given that we didn't sign the first two ...brendywendy wrote:4.5 million for scott brownStreets wrote:Like the last two summers, yes.Chuckle Brother wrote:So is it fair to say the general consensus then is that there are probably some half hearted moves going on in the background but they are getting their excuses in early for if/when it doesn't happen ?
4 m euros for mensah
fae, halford 2M+
halfhearted?
we had bids accepted out of those too, not just made-Streets wrote:Um, did we actually get Mensah and Brown?brendywendy wrote:4.5 million for scott brownStreets wrote: Like the last two summers, yes.
4 m euros for mensah
fae, halford 2M+
£3.5m for Lescott, £1.5m for Whitehead, £2m for Matt Kilgallion
halfhearted?
Anyone can put a huge bid in and look ambitious. We weren't able to bring said players here when one (Mensah) clearly was desperate to come over.
Making a bid is easy, anyone can do it, even you.
he was talking about halfhearted bidspapereyes wrote:Given that we didn't sign the first two ...brendywendy wrote:4.5 million for scott brownStreets wrote:
Like the last two summers, yes.
4 m euros for mensah
fae, halford 2M+
halfhearted?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 209 guests