Those questions are for the chairman.Cripple Creek wrote:'Who is this list of questions addressed to the chairman for?'
What?
This is very poor.EverHopeful wrote:isn't it fun to speculate on something we nothing about...........just to add the same as the rest.......Ruskies, no money now and never had any, despite daddys purported billions. Son is a lost sheep who is beholdent to daddy for everything allegedly and it is a struggle to understand how the hell the RFC Board ever approved the takeover, let alone the Premier & Football Leagues, but what the hell do we know about regulations????
we have been hugely duped as supporters/season ticket holders which is annoying but something we can do nothing about. You do however have to feel sorry for SJM who i'm sure felt he would get a decent amount of cash, having invested a shed load (well at least £7M as per RFC per accounts) and now is likely to get jack shit back - my £375 for a season ticket is chicken feed in context as to be fair i would pay that for any division to be honest.
Question though is what does the future hold - new owners?, new part owners?, fans buyout? (ha,ha), bankruptcy. lots or permutations but realistically its new owners by Jan, bye bye Ruskies and lots of years in Championship (which is probably good) and then building for a drive for 17th place in premier, but hopefully with 18 english players out of 25 and 99% of english team.......utopia! (ps pissed as been waterside inn all afternoon, whoops!)
If this does go horribly wrong, I'm not sure anyone should feel sympathy for SJM, even if he sold in good faith (which i'm sure he has). Save your sympathy for the fans.howser wrote:The longer this uncertainty goes on aligned with Antons failure to appear for matches, the more this speculation and this thread will grow. No one should be surprised with the little amount of information concerning the take over that comes out of the club, we are the football equivalent of the secret service, if this does go horribly wrong my sympathy is with SJM, he genuilly sold the club to Anton believing he was doing the right thing for the club for the forseable future.
if you can afford to get pissed in the waterside inn, if you are referring to the Bray establishment, then yeah £375 is chicken feed; for many it isn'tEverHopeful wrote:isn't it fun to speculate on something we nothing about...........just to add the same as the rest.......Ruskies, no money now and never had any, despite daddys purported billions. Son is a lost sheep who is beholdent to daddy for everything allegedly and it is a struggle to understand how the hell the RFC Board ever approved the takeover, let alone the Premier & Football Leagues, but what the hell do we know about regulations????
we have been hugely duped as supporters/season ticket holders which is annoying but something we can do nothing about. You do however have to feel sorry for SJM who i'm sure felt he would get a decent amount of cash, having invested a shed load (well at least £7M as per RFC per accounts) and now is likely to get jack shit back - my £375 for a season ticket is chicken feed in context as to be fair i would pay that for any division to be honest.
Question though is what does the future hold - new owners?, new part owners?, fans buyout? (ha,ha), bankruptcy. lots or permutations but realistically its new owners by Jan, bye bye Ruskies and lots of years in Championship (which is probably good) and then building for a drive for 17th place in premier, but hopefully with 18 english players out of 25 and 99% of english team.......utopia! (ps pissed as been waterside inn all afternoon, whoops!)
Actually prices during weekday lunchtimes at The Waterside Inn aren't that bad. However, I agree, £375 is still a pretty large sum for a lot of people, particularly if they are buying tickets for other members of their family too.SydenhamRoyal wrote:if you can afford to get pissed in the waterside inn, if you are referring to the Bray establishment, then yeah £375 is chicken feed; for many it isn'tEverHopeful wrote:isn't it fun to speculate on something we nothing about...........just to add the same as the rest.......Ruskies, no money now and never had any, despite daddys purported billions. Son is a lost sheep who is beholdent to daddy for everything allegedly and it is a struggle to understand how the hell the RFC Board ever approved the takeover, let alone the Premier & Football Leagues, but what the hell do we know about regulations????
we have been hugely duped as supporters/season ticket holders which is annoying but something we can do nothing about. You do however have to feel sorry for SJM who i'm sure felt he would get a decent amount of cash, having invested a shed load (well at least £7M as per RFC per accounts) and now is likely to get jack shit back - my £375 for a season ticket is chicken feed in context as to be fair i would pay that for any division to be honest.
Question though is what does the future hold - new owners?, new part owners?, fans buyout? (ha,ha), bankruptcy. lots or permutations but realistically its new owners by Jan, bye bye Ruskies and lots of years in Championship (which is probably good) and then building for a drive for 17th place in premier, but hopefully with 18 english players out of 25 and 99% of english team.......utopia! (ps pissed as been waterside inn all afternoon, whoops!)
Yeah, some ming on the internet saying £7m means its credible and worth considering as a real figure.Man Friday wrote:If he's only invested £7m in the club overall I have no sympathy. I thought he had invested tens of millions. Cheapskate. As ever the fans are mugs. No wonder I'm losing interest in football/Reading.
Equally some mings have also quoted very large figures that could be just as unreliable. What should not be forgotten is that an awful lot of money that JM 'put into the club' and which many people took to mean had given, was in fact loaned. Yes, at very favourable rates to the club and yes, JM was taking a risk but nevertheless loans, which I believe have been repaid.Ian Royal wrote:Yeah, some ming on the internet saying £7m means its credible and worth considering as a real figure.Man Friday wrote:If he's only invested £7m in the club overall I have no sympathy. I thought he had invested tens of millions. Cheapskate. As ever the fans are mugs. No wonder I'm losing interest in football/Reading.
Jesus Christ, do you people believe absolutely everything you read?
lolPepe the Horseman wrote:Those questions are for the chairman.Cripple Creek wrote:'Who is this list of questions addressed to the chairman for?'
What?
Says the man who has quoted figures with such certainty.Ian Royal wrote:Yeah, some ming on the internet saying £7m means its credible and worth considering as a real figure.Man Friday wrote:If he's only invested £7m in the club overall I have no sympathy. I thought he had invested tens of millions. Cheapskate. As ever the fans are mugs. No wonder I'm losing interest in football/Reading.
Jesus Christ, do you people believe absolutely everything you read?
Obviously it was loaned. Anything else would be insanity. But loaned doesn't guarantee it can be recovered. And it's not like there's any evidence of interest.RoyalBlue wrote:Equally some mings have also quoted very large figures that could be just as unreliable. What should not be forgotten is that an awful lot of money that JM 'put into the club' and which many people took to mean had given, was in fact loaned. Yes, at very favourable rates to the club and yes, JM was taking a risk but nevertheless loans, which I believe have been repaid.Ian Royal wrote:Yeah, some ming on the internet saying £7m means its credible and worth considering as a real figure.Man Friday wrote:If he's only invested £7m in the club overall I have no sympathy. I thought he had invested tens of millions. Cheapskate. As ever the fans are mugs. No wonder I'm losing interest in football/Reading.
Jesus Christ, do you people believe absolutely everything you read?
Generally published figures, rather than something someone's just made up.Victor Meldrew wrote:Says the man who has quoted figures with such certainty.Ian Royal wrote:Yeah, some ming on the internet saying £7m means its credible and worth considering as a real figure.Man Friday wrote:If he's only invested £7m in the club overall I have no sympathy. I thought he had invested tens of millions. Cheapskate. As ever the fans are mugs. No wonder I'm losing interest in football/Reading.
Jesus Christ, do you people believe absolutely everything you read?
A bit like someone watching a 5 minute highlights package and then making a judgement on the whole game.Ian Royal wrote:Yeah, some ming on the internet saying £7m means its credible and worth considering as a real figure.Man Friday wrote:If he's only invested £7m in the club overall I have no sympathy. I thought he had invested tens of millions. Cheapskate. As ever the fans are mugs. No wonder I'm losing interest in football/Reading.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Royals and Racers and 63 guests