Brum lost though, which is also good news for us.windermereROYAL wrote:Down to 5th, Ince out.
Brum lost though, which is also good news for us.windermereROYAL wrote:Down to 5th, Ince out.
Do people let you have shoe laces and belts? Because that seems like a risky idea.Jackson Corner wrote:The season even in August is already depressing. Norwich, Watford, Burnley Sheffield United way better than anyone else with there parachute payments.
Yes, gets boring every year with same teams up and down. Premiership parachute money just too much which makes it very difficult for any other teams to competewindermereROYAL wrote:Very predictable top 4.
Not sure Burnley will be top 6 come the end of the season. Don't think they are consistent enough. Sheff Utd, Norwich and Watford will be top 6 though. Norwich will walk the league now after their rocky start.Bristol Paul wrote:Yes, gets boring every year with same teams up and down. Premiership parachute money just too much which makes it very difficult for any other teams to competewindermereROYAL wrote:Very predictable top 4.
And then they’ll struggle in the Prem next year, same pattern between championship and Premier League every year. Even teams that do well initially seem to come back down after 2 or 3 years. Occasional exception as there is to every rule.Royal_jimmy wrote:Not sure Burnley will be top 6 come the end of the season. Don't think they are consistent enough. Sheff Utd, Norwich and Watford will be top 6 though. Norwich will walk the league now after their rocky start.Bristol Paul wrote:Yes, gets boring every year with same teams up and down. Premiership parachute money just too much which makes it very difficult for any other teams to competewindermereROYAL wrote:Very predictable top 4.
Bar the Lumley save when 3-0 up against Blackburn did he make an actual save beyond the absolute routine in any of those games?YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:I get the comparison, I don't think it's quite the same though. We were absolutely under the cosh with Pauno and always looked a whisker away from defeat. Boro threw a bit at us but Millwall and Cardiff, from recent memory, didn't actually have a great deal of clear cut chances against us. Under Pauno we were just one good finish from the opposition away from crumbling whereas our previous 3 wins, we never really looked in "that" much danger of getting beat.Snowflake Royal wrote:Those three had shades of the early run in Clowno's first season. Riding our luck, keeping cleansheets we couldn't maintain longer term.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:
If every 4-0 defeat is followed by 3 wins and 3 clean sheets, I'll happily take a battering every time we get beat.
Unfortunately, I can't see it going to plan just like that for the rest of the season.
Doesn’t matter. That level of pressure will regularly lead to goals in the long term, and that little possession will struggle to score goals regularly in the long term.Hound wrote:Bar the Lumley save when 3-0 up against Blackburn did he make an actual save beyond the absolute routine in any of those games?YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:I get the comparison, I don't think it's quite the same though. We were absolutely under the cosh with Pauno and always looked a whisker away from defeat. Boro threw a bit at us but Millwall and Cardiff, from recent memory, didn't actually have a great deal of clear cut chances against us. Under Pauno we were just one good finish from the opposition away from crumbling whereas our previous 3 wins, we never really looked in "that" much danger of getting beat.Snowflake Royal wrote: Those three had shades of the early run in Clowno's first season. Riding our luck, keeping cleansheets we couldn't maintain longer term.
This, was optimistic on the build up of a good battle. Saw the team sheet and in my mind didn't make sense. But ultimately wouldn't have made a huge difference who we started.URZZZZ wrote:Never likely to get anything out of the game tonight, was simply one game too far for us
Don’t think Ince got his tactics right though, said before the game that you have to control their midfield, there aren’t many better midfielders in the Championship than Norwood when you let him dictate the play and that’s exactly what we did today. It’s said almost every time we lost to them but what a waste of a quality player he was, totally misused him here
Also think Joao ahead of Long was a mistake as it was essential to really press up from the front which Long does a better job of doing but ultimately not sure how much of an actual difference that would have made
Can't argue with any of that. Felt we were starting to get a toehold toward the end of the half and having got lucky by only being 1 down, there were signs that if we could stay tight, we would create something or get a chance from a set play. But 90 seconds after half-time, done - move on, focus on Stoke and hopefully have another couple of bodies available for that as well.Snowflake Royal wrote:Whilst we were totally outclassed first half, we went in at the break growing into the game still firmly in it and knowing we could carve out chances.
That early goal second half, with Fornah beaten at a defensive set piece in about his first involvement in the game killed it though.
If we are alert at the start of that half and can hold out for 10 minutes or so, it's easily a different game we could snatch an undeserved point from.
Once we let Sheff get their dander up again, we were buried.
Ince got it wrong, McIntyre can't manage a midfield slot in that sort of game and we disrupted our well balanced midfield for him. Loum wasn't prepared for that level of quality in the Championship, and Hendrick just isn't really up to that level of quality.
Once again we started too deep and got punished. Our best phases were when we pushed higher to press. Lots of niggly fouls before they got in our half to disrupt them and break their rhythm was the way to go. Too often they just ran past our players and too often they were doing it too deep in our half to risk giving away freekicks.
We worked hard, gave it a go and got some chances, sadly we snatched at them.
Better team won and did a number on us. We won't play many teams that good at this level.
That's a fair point about possession, generally the teams that have more of the ball win more games than those that don't, obviously not the case in all scenario's though. But, as Stam proved, just "having the ball" can be seen as important because it means the opposition doesn't have it and therefore can't score. When we used to have 80% of the ball under Stam, that's essentially saying to the opposition that they have about 12-15 minutes in possession to score a goal, whereas we have 45+ minutes to score a goal (accounting for about a third of the game is taken up by set pieces, which we'd have the lions share of as we used to have most of the ball).Snowflake Royal wrote:Doesn’t matter. That level of pressure will regularly lead to goals in the long term, and that little possession will struggle to score goals regularly in the long term.Hound wrote:Bar the Lumley save when 3-0 up against Blackburn did he make an actual save beyond the absolute routine in any of those games?YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:
I get the comparison, I don't think it's quite the same though. We were absolutely under the cosh with Pauno and always looked a whisker away from defeat. Boro threw a bit at us but Millwall and Cardiff, from recent memory, didn't actually have a great deal of clear cut chances against us. Under Pauno we were just one good finish from the opposition away from crumbling whereas our previous 3 wins, we never really looked in "that" much danger of getting beat.
Did Lumley have many saves to make against Sheffield? He made 3 total, at least one if not more were just routine.
I was at the game and this a very good summary.Snowflake Royal wrote:Whilst we were totally outclassed first half, we went in at the break growing into the game still firmly in it and knowing we could carve out chances.
That early goal second half, with Fornah beaten at a defensive set piece in about his first involvement in the game killed it though.
If we are alert at the start of that half and can hold out for 10 minutes or so, it's easily a different game we could snatch an undeserved point from.
Once we let Sheff get their dander up again, we were buried.
Ince got it wrong, McIntyre can't manage a midfield slot in that sort of game and we disrupted our well balanced midfield for him. Loum wasn't prepared for that level of quality in the Championship, and Hendrick just isn't really up to that level of quality.
Once again we started too deep and got punished. Our best phases were when we pushed higher to press. Lots of niggly fouls before they got in our half to disrupt them and break their rhythm was the way to go. Too often they just ran past our players and too often they were doing it too deep in our half to risk giving away freekicks.
We worked hard, gave it a go and got some chances, sadly we snatched at them.
Better team won and did a number on us. We won't play many teams that good at this level.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Humpty Jumpshoes and 229 guests