What about before a game?Hound wrote:Honestly couldn’t care what the managers say or do after a game
5 mins after a disappointing finish and result, natural reaction just to pick an obvious excuse to help deflect blame on him or the players
You know what I mean Vic. The instant reactions to games and people getting upset by the excuses they make or silly things they say about the refSouth Coast Royal wrote:What about before a game?Hound wrote:Honestly couldn’t care what the managers say or do after a game
5 mins after a disappointing finish and result, natural reaction just to pick an obvious excuse to help deflect blame on him or the players
It was good to hear the reasoning behind why son Tom wasn't a starter or don't you care about that either?.
What if he had told us that Hutchinson will be out for the season-still wouldn't care about that?
I always want to hear what the manager has to say as I continue to be interested in hearing anything to do with our club.
Doesn’t matter how much money you have you still get knackered!Royal_jimmy wrote:These management complaints about fixture congestion drives me up the wall. All teams are going through the same schedule. They should focus on building the fitness of their squad.
Players are paid an insane amount of money so they should just get on with it.
Agree. Was a level above both Fornah & Hendrick until that last 10. Unfortunately he’s cost us the game with that stupid tackle thoughHound wrote:He was excellent until he fcuked up for the penCountryRoyal wrote:Who was the player we had at the start of the season?!Ascotexgunner wrote:Loume looks utterly awful.
Plus 1. It's always the same.Hound wrote:You know what I mean Vic. The instant reactions to games and people getting upset by the excuses they make or silly things they say about the refSouth Coast Royal wrote:What about before a game?Hound wrote:Honestly couldn’t care what the managers say or do after a game
5 mins after a disappointing finish and result, natural reaction just to pick an obvious excuse to help deflect blame on him or the players
It was good to hear the reasoning behind why son Tom wasn't a starter or don't you care about that either?.
What if he had told us that Hutchinson will be out for the season-still wouldn't care about that?
I always want to hear what the manager has to say as I continue to be interested in hearing anything to do with our club.
Of course I’m interested in injuries and when things have calmed and they talk about decisions they make
People seem to be writing off Carroll and Joao as a pairing very early. So far they have played an enormous 147 minutes together. Less than two full games, and not even in consecutive matches. In that time we've scored 3 goals, with Joao winning a penalty and Carroll scoring it. And despite a slightly barren run, Joao is still at a strike rate of about 1 in 3 despite not being at his best and not getting a huge amount of service.South Coast Royal wrote:For all the criticism of Joao recently he did win the penalty for us with his quick footwork (good touch for a big man as they say).
Unfortunately the pairing of him and Carroll doesn't work too well and as the season goes on and, as always with us subject to fitness, I can see Shane Long playing in a two with either Joao or with Carroll for whole games or parts of games.
A slightly younger Jamie Cureton or a Le Fondre could have performed that role even better.
Clear pen when you see the angle from behind the goal - Loum carelessly smashed in to the QPR player.Zip wrote:Never a pen for the fake hoops. Just seen it again and I just can't see the foul.
Seriously? Clear as day.Zip wrote:Never a pen for the fake hoops. Just seen it again and I just can't see the foul.
Both were clear pens. Was however convinced QPR were going to get one as soon as we got away with the handball in the first half. Any little contact in the box was going to be a spot kick which makes the challenge from Loum crazier. More worrying is the fact that he struggled to get over the mistake and was a liability for the last few mins having been excellent up to that point.Royal Rother wrote:Seriously? Clear as day.Zip wrote:Never a pen for the fake hoops. Just seen it again and I just can't see the foul.
Ours was more debatable.
From front on I didn't think there was much contact. Apparently other angles showed it was a clear foul.Royal Rother wrote:Seriously? Clear as day.Zip wrote:Never a pen for the fake hoops. Just seen it again and I just can't see the foul.
Ours was more debatable.
Both definite pens for sure.Stranded wrote:Both were clear pens. Was however convinced QPR were going to get one as soon as we got away with the handball in the first half. Any little contact in the box was going to be a spot kick which makes the challenge from Loum crazier. More worrying is the fact that he struggled to get over the mistake and was a liability for the last few mins having been excellent up to that point.Royal Rother wrote:Seriously? Clear as day.Zip wrote:Never a pen for the fake hoops. Just seen it again and I just can't see the foul.
Ours was more debatable.
Tbf first angle I saw replayed showed little contact and it looked a bit of a dive. From a couple of the other angles you could see significant contact and was undoubtedly the right decisionZip wrote:From front on I didn't think there was much contact. Apparently other angles showed it was a clear foul.Royal Rother wrote:Seriously? Clear as day.Zip wrote:Never a pen for the fake hoops. Just seen it again and I just can't see the foul.
Ours was more debatable.
The issue that I felt made ours more debatable was that Joao’s foot seemed to be on the defender’s foot at the point of impact which is unusual in those circumstances. I agree still a pen though.Hound wrote:Tbf first angle I saw replayed showed little contact and it looked a bit of a dive. From a couple of the other angles you could see significant contact and was undoubtedly the right decisionZip wrote:From front on I didn't think there was much contact. Apparently other angles showed it was a clear foul.Royal Rother wrote:
Seriously? Clear as day.
Ours was more debatable.
Ours was also clear as day - only thing for me whether it was in the area, which i think it was - just
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bazzaballs, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], RG30, WestYorksRoyal and 156 guests