by Hendo » 15 Jan 2024 16:26
15 Jan 2024 16:26by ozzygull » 15 Jan 2024 16:27
15 Jan 2024 16:27I have often wondered that myself. There was no space around the Goldstone to expand it and if it was referbished to the levels of a modern stadium the capacity would have been reduced massively. The highest attendence at the Goldstone was 36,747, the Amex which is much bigger holds 31,876 due to it being an all seater stadium. But I agree if we still had the Goldstone I am not sure we would have ever been given permision for Falmer. Even on my most generous day I do not feel any gratitude towards Archer/Stanley. The game against Herford was one of the worst feelings in life, when it finished I just sobbed out of relief and nervous exhaustion.Sutekh wrote:Might the Archer/Stanley takeover now be argued as the best thing that happened to Brighton in a perverse way as it brought all the support together and consolidated it into one goal quite quickly whereas without it the club would have been bumbling along at the Goldstone and not have had the obvious inequities of no ground and then the Withdean to keep the focus (if you pardon the pun) very much on the persuasion of the government of the day?ozzygull wrote:They may have sold us but it was not until they got what they wanted, The only thing you can do is keep going and don't let it slip out of people's consciousness, whoever's got the ability to change the situation is who you need to target.WestYorksRoyal wrote:
I fear it won't happen to us. The key with Brighton is that the owner sold, while our owner is lying to us when he says he will. Bury's owner rejected several offers before it ended; he lost out big time and tried to sue the EFL for their expulsion, to no avail.
It's great what Brighton have done and they do offer hope, but only if we can get rid of this guy for which, let's be honest, we're out of ideas.
by Ten Bobsworth » 15 Jan 2024 17:06
15 Jan 2024 17:06Don't believe me, check it out.Snowflake Royal wrote:Ten Bobsworth wrote:Get behind it with another futile gesture. That'll show 'em what you're made of.Snowflake Royal wrote:I think it's a case that most people who argue against the action still respectvthe feelung behind it and support the right to do it.
And you can argue whether it's constructive or the best action as much as you like before it happens to try to influence against it, but once it's happened that's done and its time to send a united front.
I was against tennis ball disruptions during the game, I'd prefer a different protest or timing that doesn't interrupt play. But it did it's job and was mostly well handled, which is worth applauding those who did it.
Same for the pitch invasion. I think it's more harmful than helpful, and now was the wrong time. I didn’t think it should happen. But it has, so now we get behind it.
Why not try to become preferred bidder like BWFCST did. They raised £50K.£50k?
When the time comes that we have a chance of buying the club or creating a phoenix club, I'd expect us to raise that much from just our highest 10 - 20 contributors. I'd do at least 4% of it myself. Maybe more.
The idea that £50k would get anything for a club with assets worth about £15m - £25m is hilarious. oxf*rd off back to Bolton, they don't want you either, but you're their village idiot, not ours.
by Dirk Gently » 15 Jan 2024 17:19
15 Jan 2024 17:19If it's losing a million or more a year, and if those paper assets of £15m - £25m can't be realised because of planning or other restrictions, then taking any sum to be able to walk away is a good deal.Snowflake Royal wrote:....... The idea that £50k would get anything for a club with assets worth about £15m - £25m is hilarious. ...
by Snowflake Royal » 15 Jan 2024 18:41
15 Jan 2024 18:41Yeah, in some cases. But then we know that Dai will turndown millions, let alone a few thou.Dirk Gently wrote:If it's losing a million or more a year, and if those paper assets of £15m - £25m can't be realised because of planning or other restrictions, then taking any sum to be able to walk away is a good deal.Snowflake Royal wrote:....... The idea that £50k would get anything for a club with assets worth about £15m - £25m is hilarious. ...
I know of, and have been involved in, quite a few supporter buyouts where the seller was only happy to take a derisory sum in order to get a perpetual money pit off their hands.
by Uke » 15 Jan 2024 18:45
15 Jan 2024 18:45by grey_squirrel » 15 Jan 2024 19:36
15 Jan 2024 19:36by AthleticoSpizz » 15 Jan 2024 19:42
15 Jan 2024 19:42by grey_squirrel » 15 Jan 2024 19:47
15 Jan 2024 19:47It was precis'd as a 90 second afterthought to Southampton's headline non-losing streak. No editorial content or comment.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Missed Meridian Tonight (tonight)
Was there much mention of the proceedings on their sports coverage?
by jd82 » 15 Jan 2024 19:48
15 Jan 2024 19:48Somehow both of these are the most RFC shoes imaginable.Uke wrote:
[/url]
by AthleticoSpizz » 15 Jan 2024 19:51
15 Jan 2024 19:51thanx GS ……I guess (and exactly as expectedgrey_squirrel wrote:It was precis'd as a 90 second afterthought to Southampton's headline non-losing streak. No editorial content or comment.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Missed Meridian Tonight (tonight)
Was there much mention of the proceedings on their sports coverage?
by Vision » 15 Jan 2024 21:10
15 Jan 2024 21:10It could depend on what "losing face" looks like to him though.Orion1871 wrote:Not this one. He has no shame and doesn't care about "losing face".paddy20 wrote:The last thing Chinese owners want is to lose face. The publicity now I hope will be embaressing for Dai. I see the Chinese have now bought our famous prison as well
by P!ssed Off » 15 Jan 2024 21:31
15 Jan 2024 21:31Cheers. Think that is me hopping the East Stand hoardings.Hendo wrote:Some pics of the pitch invasion I took on Saturday - thought there would be more on here.
![]()
by BRO_BOT » 15 Jan 2024 22:39
15 Jan 2024 22:39
by Lower West » 15 Jan 2024 23:10
15 Jan 2024 23:10by tmesis » 16 Jan 2024 07:59
16 Jan 2024 07:59by Ten Bobsworth » 16 Jan 2024 08:08
16 Jan 2024 08:08This is neither the time nor the place for commonsense.Lower West wrote:Only on social media will you find people publishing photographs of others committing a criminal offence. Dumb is an understatement.
by Snowflake Royal » 16 Jan 2024 08:35
16 Jan 2024 08:35by Snowflake Royal » 16 Jan 2024 08:38
16 Jan 2024 08:38Give over granddad.Lower West wrote:Only on social media will you find people publishing photographs of others committing a criminal offence. Dumb is an understatement.
by LWJ » 16 Jan 2024 09:12
16 Jan 2024 09:12Do you know something I don't?Snowflake Royal wrote:Give over granddad.Lower West wrote:Only on social media will you find people publishing photographs of others committing a criminal offence. Dumb is an understatement.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Doc, Google Adsense [Bot] and 287 guests