If you got 3 points just for turning up. I'm sure we discussed it at the time and the conversion was less than 106Mr Angry wrote:Doncaster Rovers would have beaten it with 3 points a game back in the day.
105 pts from 42 games, so similar to United ones already cited.Snowflake Royal wrote:If you got 3 points just for turning up. I'm sure we discussed it at the time and the conversion was less than 106Mr Angry wrote:Doncaster Rovers would have beaten it with 3 points a game back in the day.
I wonder how much the change to 3pts for a win influenced how teams approach games though, I assume teams back then were more likely to settle for a draw because it was comparatively more valuable than it is today.Mr Angry wrote:Doncaster Rovers would have beaten it with 3 points a game back in the day.
Good point. I think it would definitely affect strategy.tidus_mi2 wrote:I wonder how much the change to 3pts for a win influenced how teams approach games though, I assume teams back then were more likely to settle for a draw because it was comparatively more valuable than it is today.Mr Angry wrote:Doncaster Rovers would have beaten it with 3 points a game back in the day.
My bad; I thought I had read it somewhere.stealthpapes wrote:105 pts from 42 games, so similar to United ones already cited.Snowflake Royal wrote:If you got 3 points just for turning up. I'm sure we discussed it at the time and the conversion was less than 106Mr Angry wrote:Doncaster Rovers would have beaten it with 3 points a game back in the day.
Better than the previous record, only lasted for 7 seasons.genome wrote:The record stood for nearly 20 years. That's pretty good going.
Have we got the record for holding the record? I feel a new chat coming on...Hendo wrote:Better than the previous record, only lasted for 7 seasons.genome wrote:The record stood for nearly 20 years. That's pretty good going.
From Despair To Where? wrote:To be honest, I'm not massively bothered about the record going because it in no way diminishes what the 2005/06 team achieved.
I think I'm not that bothered because, although it meant a lot to us, it meant fcuk all to 99% of football fans and, to be honest, anyone who does care about it will always have the caveat that they did it in League 1 with a squad that cost £40m.LUX wrote:From Despair To Where? wrote:To be honest, I'm not massively bothered about the record going because it in no way diminishes what the 2005/06 team achieved.
TBH it does bother me, but I accept RFC has far bigger issues to resolve.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Gunny Fishcake, Larry_Parnell, Polonia and 24 guests