Kit for the ladies please...East Stand Ste wrote:looks more like west bromSPARTA wrote:EXCLUSIVE
Kit for the ladies please...East Stand Ste wrote:looks more like west bromSPARTA wrote:EXCLUSIVE

Don't have the photoshop skills of JayRoyal but here goes..._royal wrote:Wish we could have Nike, this kit would look great in blue and white :

It's because we're not important enough to demand our own template. There's no profit in Puma spending time, effort and money designing a different cut for us. Most teams have a simpler colour pattern (no hoops), so a bit of styled embellishment breaks up the monotony of a plain red/blue/white shirt which you won't be able to sell on consecutive years._royal wrote:Cheers for that! It's such a simple design as well... makes you wonder how puma have managed to mess it up year after year
It's got bugger all to do with importance. Windsor FC have a new, unique design for next season which will raise eyebrows and, in some cases, have people being sick all over the place. And it is not as if Macron are a small supplier either.Royal Ginger wrote:It's because we're not important enough to demand our own template. There's no profit in Puma spending time, effort and money designing a different cut for us. Most teams have a simpler colour pattern (no hoops), so a bit of styled embellishment breaks up the monotony of a plain red/blue/white shirt which you won't be able to sell on consecutive years._royal wrote:Cheers for that! It's such a simple design as well... makes you wonder how puma have managed to mess it up year after year
We could do with a sponsor that brings in more money anyway. We're always way down the lists in the PL and Championship when it comes to sponsor income. I'll have to try and dig out the latest table if I can find it. I do quite like Waitrose though. It's not ugly on a kit unlike many others.Blue & White Soup wrote:Waitrose are the new sponsors of the England Cricket team, could mean the end of our partnership, new sponsor watch begins (possibly)
Or even worse a pay day loan companySt. Brynjar wrote:It'd be a shame to lose Waitrose. Definitely preferable to any soulless betting company.
This guy clearly can't handle the truth, I'll give you odds of 1,000/1 that my above statement is correct.Royal Ginger wrote:Oh, that's good to know then. Wazzock has spoken everyone, shut the internet down, we're done.
Or even HAT painting!_royal wrote:Or even worse a pay day loan companySt. Brynjar wrote:It'd be a shame to lose Waitrose. Definitely preferable to any soulless betting company.
royalgrumpy wrote:The Puma contract runs until the end of next season (14/15), but they haven't signed a new deal yet. They've been speaking to new suppliers over the last couple of months. No idea about the Waitrose contract.

You're probably right but the complete lack of qualification of your statement makes it a bit empty. It would appear that you're just guessing out of thin air. Would you care to explain the logic behind your grand sweeping statement?WAZZOCK wrote:This guy clearly can't handle the truth, I'll give you odds of 1,000/1 that my above statement is correct.Royal Ginger wrote:Oh, that's good to know then. Wazzock has spoken everyone, shut the internet down, we're done.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests