
You're one of the main reasons i avoid the team board. I also know of your marvellous insight on general football including your superbly accurate prediction that Liverpool would be relegated this season. BELLEND.Ideal wrote:F U C K O F F N E W B I E ! ! ! ! ! ! !Team Board Avoider wrote:Yes keep the team stuff to the team board. As my username suggests i dont want to see it here.
this is blx http://www.skysports.com/video/inline/0 ... 66,00.html about 50 seconds in. Hazard had to run to get it....actually you've got eyes and i cbaM Brook wrote:
It didn't need retrieving - it was rebounding back into the field of play before the overgrown ballboy decided to intervene purely, one can only assume, to waste time.
Nah, I just want Bradford to win.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:For ball boys slowing up playIan Royal wrote:I feel really sorry for Hazard, he's been done up like a kipper. That ball boy was an absolute cock-end and Hazard was clearly trying to kick the ball, there's no way he did any real damage with that. But he's got zero chance of appealing because of the reaction and because he simply shouldn't have done it.
In an ideal world, I'd like to see Swansea kicked out the competition and the cup automatically awarded to Bradford. But I'd settle for a hefty fine and loling at Chelsea.![]()
![]()
F*ck me Ian, you're strict. Whats a professional foul nowadays? A firing squad??
Crazy 24 hours. Spoke to Hazard and I will not be pressing charges. Be in touch
#prayforcharlieTFF wrote:I really thought he'd have been told to kill the twatter a/c
https://twitter.com/CHARLIEM0RGAN/statu ... 3658793986
Crazy 24 hours. Spoke to Hazard and I will not be pressing charges. Be in touch

Not a chance - have you seen his twitter pics? He stands to inherit a £47 million fortune and he has no shame whatsoever. Classic tosser. The only thing that has surprised me about him was that he's 17!!!!who are ya? wrote:He must have had at cringe himself looking back at it, laying on top of a ball and then rolling around the floor like Sergio Busquets.
Agreed.Spid wrote:FA charging Hazard, as they feel a "3 match ban is clearly not sufficient"
i think 3 matches is more than enough ? is it just me that doesn't even think it was that bad![]()
classic overreacting by most again, demanding action. surely the cringeworthy nature of the whole thing is enough of a punishment.
Claims Direct are really upping their game these daysBlue Hooped Moose wrote:He stands to inherit a £47 million fortune
Hope Swansea get charged with something too. And whack a charge of bringing the game into disrepute on Big Watch for opening his thick trap as well.Spid wrote:FA charging Hazard, as they feel a "3 match ban is clearly not sufficient"
i think 3 matches is more than enough ? is it just me that doesn't even think it was that bad![]()
classic overreacting by most again, demanding action. surely the cringeworthy nature of the whole thing is enough of a punishment.
i saw a bloke the other day who looked just like the man of Family Guywho are ya? wrote:
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 51 guests