Actually, no. Logic dictates that fact be proven, which you haven't done and therefore you can't be right.WAZZOCK wrote:There doesn't need to be any logic, it's a fact.
Let's just accept I'm right and move on.
Remember to post this every JulyHoop Blah wrote:It's all about having enough to differentiate each kit from the previous to make people buy the latest one.
If they stuck to the kit we nearly all want, ie a simple narrow'ish blue and white hoops with white shorts and socks, they couldn't flog as many every season.
Actually, no, we need to remind the oxf*rd that we need hoops....and no oxf*rd back panels!harry wrote:Remember to post this every JulyHoop Blah wrote:It's all about having enough to differentiate each kit from the previous to make people buy the latest one.
If they stuck to the kit we nearly all want, ie a simple narrow'ish blue and white hoops with white shorts and socks, they couldn't flog as many every season.
Well lets hope that's the end of Puma then!SPARTA wrote:royalgrumpy wrote:The Puma contract runs until the end of next season (14/15), but they haven't signed a new deal yet. They've been speaking to new suppliers over the last couple of months. No idea about the Waitrose contract.
Agreed. It should be possible to change a kit a each year without having to ruin it with "flourishes" and back panels. There's nothing too wrong with adding a little detail around the shoulder etc, but I can't see why they feel the need to make the hoops stop to incorporate it.SpaceCruiser wrote:Actually, no, we need to remind the oxf*rd that we need hoops....and no oxf*rd back panels!harry wrote:Remember to post this every JulyHoop Blah wrote:It's all about having enough to differentiate each kit from the previous to make people buy the latest one.
If they stuck to the kit we nearly all want, ie a simple narrow'ish blue and white hoops with white shorts and socks, they couldn't flog as many every season.
Id rather have a new set every season. Couldn't stand playing in the same kit season in season out.. and its always exciting when it comes outCureton's Volley wrote:The argument abut needing to 'change it up' to sell more shirts is BS. Until we have a 'proper Reading' kit none of my family are buying any.
The idea of having a traditional kit every 5 years or so sounds like a good compromise, but one Puma are unfortunately too stupid to comprehend.
Rotating changing kits was perfectly good enough. Home one year, away the next, then home again the one after.Blue & White Soup wrote:Id rather have a new set every season. Couldn't stand playing in the same kit season in season out.. and its always exciting when it comes outCureton's Volley wrote:The argument abut needing to 'change it up' to sell more shirts is BS. Until we have a 'proper Reading' kit none of my family are buying any.
The idea of having a traditional kit every 5 years or so sounds like a good compromise, but one Puma are unfortunately too stupid to comprehend.
But they could make more money, by creating a kit every few seasons which the likes of Curo's volley and I would buy. So actually, they're harming revenue as the people who'll buy the kits every season, will do so no matter what they look like.SPARTA wrote:It's all about the £'s though. As long as kit sales continue trending at the levels they are, then the club will be happy to exploit the mugs that cough up every summer.



+infinityIan Royal wrote:ooooo that Donny kit is niiiiiice. I'd take that it Blue and White.
It's not by PumaUSA_Loyal_Royal wrote:+infinityIan Royal wrote:ooooo that Donny kit is niiiiiice. I'd take that it Blue and White.
i am in love with that, but since most of us would like it, the club are surely not going to choose that one.![]()
they will pick the worst, cheapest, template puma has.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests