Tommio wrote:I was just about to post this. Sack him before Martin O'neill gets appointed by another club.
He said at the start of the summer he wanted 8 or 9 players.One8Seven1 wrote:NA has reiterated that the owner has been aware all summer what we need (strikers) and he expects two signings before the window closes.
AZ said 6-7, didn't he?LoyalRoyalFan wrote:He said at the start of the summer he wanted 8 or 9 players.One8Seven1 wrote:NA has reiterated that the owner has been aware all summer what we need (strikers) and he expects two signings before the window closes.
Who do we believe?
It doesn't look that new to me. Resorting to a restrictive 4-5-1 formation, presumably to shore up at the back, yet no clean sheets. Likewise, no shots on target today. Sounds very much like last season.Unbelievable Jeff wrote:It takes time to adapt a new style.
Fully agree. Sadly, despite the big talk, it appears that Madejski's legacy lives on with an overwhelming desire to try to do things on the cheap and an insane belief that we can buck the established economic model of the top level game in this country. You have to be prepared to invest decent sums of money if you want to have a good chance of success.FridaysGhost wrote:Throughout the whole of the last 15 months, we have had both the opportunity and the finances to buy decent strikers - in some cases feelers were put out and the players in question were happy to join us. As always with RFC, the big problem was their clubs insisting on being paid what each player was worth. Had we been prepared to pay 8m going into the Premiership we may not have been relegated. Were we prepared to pay 5m now, we might win the Championship. But we are Reading. Small-minded Ownership and, in some cases, small minded Fans!
How many people, who decried the idea of buying Rhodes or Austin or Hooper or even Sharp etc. are now whinging about our lack of Strikers? We could have Zaha in our ranks but he was forced to take second-best and join Man Utd. We could have been bringing Kondogbia into a new Championship campaign but apparently he was'nt worth the money - which is obviously why some of the biggest teams on the continent are now after him at twice the price.
If we buy a player with potential for his worth, let's say 8m, he may then help us achieve our aims (stay in the Prem, Get promotion from the Champ). That wipes the original payment out. However, by then the Player is worth 15m and we have a huge asset. What is it about this that some Fans don't understand?
On what planet is a player signing a contract extension a transfer?One8Seven1 wrote:AZ said 6-7, didn't he?LoyalRoyalFan wrote:He said at the start of the summer he wanted 8 or 9 players.One8Seven1 wrote:NA has reiterated that the owner has been aware all summer what we need (strikers) and he expects two signings before the window closes.
Who do we believe?
Bridge, Drenthe, Williams = 3
Pearce, HRK = 2 (5)
Plus two more... I'm no Carol Vorderman but that'd be 7, and AZ keeping his promise we wont sell our best players (unless the circumstances were that they wanted to leave).
Might have been more sensible to have sold one or two, in order to rebalance the squad! What's more, we did release two strikers who were more proven for us than McDermott's star January buy - Blackman!winchester_royal wrote:FTR, it seems that most have forgotten the fact that we haven't actually sold anyone yet this summer, unlike the 'big spending' QPR and Wigan, therefore our net spend is probably one of the highest in the league.
And many also choose to neglect what the wages are for the three we've brought in, and the squad as a whole. AZ is far from being tight, and the calls of "where's the money" are utterly ridiculous.winchester_royal wrote:FTR, it seems that most have forgotten the fact that we haven't actually sold anyone yet this summer, unlike the 'big spending' QPR and Wigan, therefore our net spend is probably one of the highest in the league.
We didn't release Church or Hunt, they turned down new contracts and chose to leave. Hunt was offered a one year deal, and Church was told to sign a new deal before the January transfer window or we would sell him.RoyalBlue wrote:Might have been more sensible to have sold one or two, in order to rebalance the squad! What's more, we did release two strikers who were more proven for us than McDermott's star January buy - Blackman!winchester_royal wrote:FTR, it seems that most have forgotten the fact that we haven't actually sold anyone yet this summer, unlike the 'big spending' QPR and Wigan, therefore our net spend is probably one of the highest in the league.
by Alexander Litvinenko » 25 Aug 2013 21:32
25 Aug 2013 21:32Users browsing this forum: Guildfordian Royal, South Coast Royal, stealthpapes, WestYorksRoyal and 251 guests