Of course, he always asks for my opinion. However, I believe that Coppell may well have heard Litas side of things and is probably in a better position to judge and make a decision than all the knee-jerkers on here.Platypuss wrote:Will you be saying the same to Steve Coppell then?Y21 wrote:I think this is being blown out of all proportion by the sensation hunting people on here. If, what the Sun has reported is true then it sounds like he had a barny with his missus which lead to an unfortunate bust up with a mate of his resulting in a headbutt. The fact it was in a nightclub in Bristol is irrelevant. The same thing could have happened anywhere. It doesn't sound like he went out of his way to get into trouble, it just happened after an argument with his missus. It makes me laugh the moral majority on here getting their collective knickers in a twist over an incident where nobody knows the facts - its a shame that everyone seems to be hanging him out to dry before hearing the whole story. My opinion is that we should wait until the full story is known before spouting forth anymore crap on here.
If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.SpaceCruiser wrote:But has he been charged?
I not concerned about that. Fact is he was out in Bristol after a long drive back from defeat at Wigan. He has been warned before by Coppell and he's ignored it, get the twat out at Christmas.zac naloen wrote:If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.SpaceCruiser wrote:But has he been charged?
What part of turning himself in did you not get you doofus? What reason would he have for turning himself in if he was not guilty?SpaceCruiser wrote:But has he been charged?
So, is he guilty then, or not?zac naloen wrote:If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.SpaceCruiser wrote:But has he been charged?
neither am i but that appears to be spaceys only concernScarface wrote:I not concerned about that. Fact is he was out in Bristol after a long drive back from defeat at Wigan. He has been warned before by Coppell and he's ignored it, get the twat out at Christmas.zac naloen wrote:If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.SpaceCruiser wrote:But has he been charged?
Perhaps to clear his name?Royalee wrote:What part of turning himself in did you not get you doofus? What reason would he have for turning himself in if he was not guilty?SpaceCruiser wrote:But has he been charged?
also as far as I know you don't tend to bring someone in to question them about GBH, thats a pretty specific charge for an incident like this. If they wanted to question him they'd probably be talking about assault. At least that s my take on this.zac naloen wrote:If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.SpaceCruiser wrote:But has he been charged?
he turned himself in you utter bell-end.SpaceCruiser wrote:So, is he guilty then, or not?zac naloen wrote:If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.SpaceCruiser wrote:But has he been charged?
FFS Spacey, he has not been found guilty of an offence as yet but it is patently obvious that he was involved in something at the weekend. That is the crux of the matter at this time. This was a result of being somewhere he had promised the management of the club he would not be. Can you not see that he has screwed up royally here?SpaceCruiser wrote:So, is he guilty then, or not?zac naloen wrote:If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.SpaceCruiser wrote:But has he been charged?
Spacey please open your eyes. You're just building a big old trench from which to defend Lita and completely ignoring pretty much everything thats been reported in your blind faith in our players.SpaceCruiser wrote:Perhaps to clear his name?Royalee wrote:What part of turning himself in did you not get you doofus? What reason would he have for turning himself in if he was not guilty?SpaceCruiser wrote:But has he been charged?
Is one warning not more than enough considering the amount of money he earns and the nature of his employment? You really are a deluded idiot.SpaceCruiser wrote:That's one. RB, the knobjockey, seems to imply that he's had more than one warning.Scarface wrote:He was opublically warned about his "public profile" last season when he was glassed out in Bristol. Coppell quite rightly expects his players to behave on and off the pitch.SpaceCruiser wrote: How many warnings have there been then?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Post of the day.SpaceCruiser wrote:Perhaps to clear his name?Royalee wrote:What part of turning himself in did you not get you doofus? What reason would he have for turning himself in if he was not guilty?SpaceCruiser wrote:But has he been charged?
Sorry but totally wrong (trust me on this, the clue's in my user name). There's no real correlation between bailing and charging. It's almost certain he's been bailed pending further enquiries, i.e. the taking of a victim/witness statements. Then more than likely he'll answer his bail and then be interviewed again before any decision is made on charging.zac naloen wrote:If he hasn't been charged he wouldn't have had to be released on bail.SpaceCruiser wrote:But has he been charged?
[/quote]rfcjoe wrote:I totally agree with all you rfc fans who think leroy lita is a waste of space.he cant hold up a ball to save his life and his work rate is sh*t.
rfcjoe is not a good addition to this site. He's started another thread on the same topic too.I totally agree with all you rfc fans who think leroy lita is a waste of space.he cant hold up a ball to save his life and his work rate is sh*t.
Oi! Watch it!The Insider wrote:If it was a black eye it could be dismissed as handbags
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], rabidbee and 398 guests