A friend of mine, who is a West Ham season ticket holder, rates him very very highly.John Smith wrote:Is Declan Rice good?
A friend of mine, who is a West Ham season ticket holder, rates him very very highly.John Smith wrote:Is Declan Rice good?
Judging by the reaction of Galatasaray fans at the game I went to, if a Galatasaray played came onto the pitch with an axe and sliced an opposition player in two, Galatasaray fans would be furious, and screaming about bias, if the ref didn't give the decision in their favour.Victor Meldrew wrote:Talking to a Turkish lad the other day (he runs the local paper shop and is a fan of Galatasaray and played both football and basketball for them but not at the very top level) his gripe is that the ref decides whether to refer to VAR (they have VAR in Turkey for all games).Sanguine wrote:That's the nuance I was trying to pull out. In cricket, the umpire gives his opinion, and if technology says it's a close call, it stays with his on-field decision. That's the bit that football fans can't get their heads around - VAR isn't and wasn't ever designed to be used to adjudge the minutest of fouls or barely detectable simulation, but to correct obvious mistakes.Hoop Blah wrote:
For me the problem is that it's also still a matter of opinion and so even on review it comes down to what that official thinks at that moment in time.
You're right - even on review, if it's a marginal call it stays with what the official thought at that moment in time. That's how it should be.
I don't see why that is a problem. The argument seems to be that because technology can't help with subjective decisions, it shouldn't help with objective ones.
He admits to looking at things through RTGs but is convinced that the refs have it in for his team and hardly ever refer when it might be to Galatasaray's advantage.
In his opinion the top Turkish ref (the one we see in European games with the very dark hair flattened by overuse of brylcream-can't think of his name) is the worst culprit of all and seemingly never refers to VAR if the decision could favour Galatasaray.
I would guess his "never" isn't actually never.
Been a while since we did any predictions. Few corkers this weekend which are nigh on impossible to call:Old Man Andrews wrote:.
Bournemouth V West Ham - Bournemouth are in a horrible run of form right now and really need to stop the slide. West Ham picked up a decent win last time out against Arsenal. West Ham are really inconsistent though and I can see Bournemouth picking up a win here. 2-1 Bournemouth winJohn Smith wrote:Been a while since we did any predictions. Few corkers this weekend which are nigh on impossible to call:Old Man Andrews wrote:.
Bournemouth v West Ham
Plymouth v Coventry
Aldershot v Chesterfield
Bath City v Torquay
John I use my extensive football knowledge to provide you with detailed and accurate predictions. No need to take the piss.John Smith wrote:Can't stop thinking about Aldershot v Chesterfield. I might have to knock Pride Park on the head and go down to watch it I'm that excited!
Andy Johnson diving expertSanguine wrote:- 12 of the 72 penalties awarded in 2004-05 (16%) went to Crystal Palace.
Was that they changed the laws so that keepers could move along the line before the ball is kicked?Sanguine wrote: That number has been around 15-20% since 2005 - did something change then?
Viewing figures. But yes, shambles being a 6pm kick off time especially for those Owls fans.Sutekh wrote:I see we get chelsea reserves v Sheff we’d on tv today. Why, exactly? We already get every ManU cup game on tv irrespective of how irrelevant the game is so are Chelsea about to join that collective?
Wolves’ trip to Shrewsbury would have been a better game to have.
Also they obviously don’t give a tuppenny about the away supporters. 6pm on a Sunday!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests