You are such a Huang Ker.Zip wrote:NathStPaul wrote:Of course it's a fake account, cannot believe anyone is fooled by it.
Funny how he thanks you on December 9th 2015 for believing him. You are such a fraud OMA
You are such a Huang Ker.Zip wrote:NathStPaul wrote:Of course it's a fake account, cannot believe anyone is fooled by it.
Funny how he thanks you on December 9th 2015 for believing him. You are such a fraud OMA
NathStPaul wrote:You are such a Huang Ker.Zip wrote:NathStPaul wrote:Of course it's a fake account, cannot believe anyone is fooled by it.
Funny how he thanks you on December 9th 2015 for believing him. You are such a fraud OMA
Given how often managers get sacked it's pretty unlikely notice periods mean anything other than how much of your contract you get paid up.Horsham Royal wrote:or ...Hound wrote:...Not like he’s gone in and just torn up his contract and walked away without a pay off
He did exactly that after Fulham but he's got a 1 month notice clause in his contract.
So Dai said "breach of contract" you're working your notice or we sue.
Which brings us nicely to 14th Feb.
Do manager's contracts typically have notice clauses and, if so, for ho long?
Who knows!
The nobber behind the account outed themselves a few years ago.Zip wrote:You still haven’t answered my questionOrion1871 wrote:Why would someone claiming to be a reputable reporter from Thailand need to hide their true identity?morganb wrote:
He may have a comedy name but evidence is evidence. Perhaps they have changed his/her name to protect their identity.
Just because Eddie Wallbank says that's his name we all believe it. Try saying it slowly out loud...
Eddie's sister was on national TV up until last week, so we know that's his genuine surname.
Don't worry mate at least you're trying to look for sources and info. Not that it says much but you're ten times better than I'd ever be, I'd get totally confused who's who so I don't even risk it. No biggie.Zip wrote:
The thing is he does sound like a comedy name but he’s got loads right before we all knew so perhaps the smart arse on here can explain that
Ok but still doesn’t explain how he got so much right. You don’t guess all that out of nowhere.Pepe the Horseman wrote:The nobber behind the account outed themselves a few years ago.Zip wrote:You still haven’t answered my questionOrion1871 wrote:
Why would someone claiming to be a reputable reporter from Thailand need to hide their true identity?
Eddie's sister was on national TV up until last week, so we know that's his genuine surname.
gazzerloyalroyal?Pepe the Horseman wrote:The nobber behind the account outed themselves a few years ago.Zip wrote:You still haven’t answered my questionOrion1871 wrote:
Why would someone claiming to be a reputable reporter from Thailand need to hide their true identity?
Eddie's sister was on national TV up until last week, so we know that's his genuine surname.
Wasn’t he supposedly itk?genome wrote:gazzerloyalroyal?Pepe the Horseman wrote:The nobber behind the account outed themselves a few years ago.Zip wrote:
You still haven’t answered my question
No you just repeat what other people are saying.Zip wrote:Ok but still doesn’t explain how he got so much right. You don’t guess all that out of nowhere.Pepe the Horseman wrote:The nobber behind the account outed themselves a few years ago.Zip wrote:
You still haven’t answered my question
ExactlyZip wrote:Wasn’t he supposedly itk?genome wrote:gazzerloyalroyal?Pepe the Horseman wrote: The nobber behind the account outed themselves a few years ago.
Oh so these stories were being posted by others at the time were they? Funny that they were not mentioned at the time.Orion1871 wrote:So Zip has gone through several other tweets at the time and found that it was VVanked and VVAnked only who broke these "exclusives".
You've been conned by a troll, take your L, and move on.
Yep. Just because of the comedy name it doesn’t mean he was a troll as he was posting a lot of accurate stuff.Brogue wrote:So even if it’s a nobber on here the amount of stuff he gets rights means he isn’t a troll? Right? My definition of a troll like this is someone who makes up stuff that never comes true just for a few likes. This just seems like a guy with a pseudonym at worst or a genuine journalist at best. Either way he’s been reliable.
No. No one was else was coming out with this stuff at the time.Snowflake Royal wrote:No you just repeat what other people are saying.Zip wrote:Ok but still doesn’t explain how he got so much right. You don’t guess all that out of nowhere.Pepe the Horseman wrote: The nobber behind the account outed themselves a few years ago.
NathStPaul wrote:Yep, exactly my thought.
With the amount of time this sacking is taking we will probably get there before long.Brogue wrote:Anyway well done lads we added 20 pages 400 new posts to this thread today. 200 pages is on!!
Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk, Wallington Royal, Wisconsin Royal and 349 guests