You must be new here?Millsy wrote:Let's not wet our beds too much guys..
So, is nobody doing a BFTG thread any more?
You must be new here?Millsy wrote:Let's not wet our beds too much guys..
Yeah I know. Not great is it?Royal Rother wrote:I know you said “beginning” - that’s where I am too.leon wrote:I said beginning. I’d rather not.Royal Rother wrote:
Having lauded him a couple of weeks ago I feel a bit dirty going along with this but the way he has sent out his team since then has been utter shite.
And today, the time wasting from minute 1 was clearly part of the plan. Which is just plain horrible.
Classic Team Board. Expressing concern and doubts is not wetting the bed.Millsy wrote:Let's not wet our beds too much guys.
I've since calmed down and can see it for what it was - a shit performance where 3-2 flattered us, but we forget we had to play a right back as CB, two of the worst performing defenders in recent history at as the other CBs, a n00b kid at RB and for some reason a winger at LB.
Things haven't suddenly changed just because we're performing way over expectations. The fact is still that we have a medical/science team not fit for the Champ so silly injuries, we have been forced into freebies and loanees and the upshot is we're trying to put a defence together out of nothing.
Let Hutch come back, Sarr get fit etc and we'll start winning again. Remember we have no right to be in the top half of the table. Keep it real.
Don't agree with your comments on Swansea.Hound wrote:Ince has to get the team on the ball more and back to pressing high
Thought Swansea were dull, blunt, unimaginative and downright boring but just with that much possession they’ll likely grind out a goal or two, esp when our defence is always like to concede crap goals like it did tonight and in the last few games
We actually looked dangerous on tbe rare times we got forward
Dunno if it’s a mentality or tactics change or personnel but can’t expect to win points with 20% possession
More likeleon wrote:Classic MillsyMillsy wrote:Let's not wet our beds too much guys.
I've since calmed down and can see it for what it was - a shit performance where 3-2 flattered us, but we forget we had to play a right back as CB, two of the worst performing defenders in recent history at as the other CBs, a n00b kid at RB and for some reason a winger at LB.
Things haven't suddenly changed just because we're performing way over expectations. The fact is still that we have a medical/science team not fit for the Champ so silly injuries, we have been forced into freebies and loanees and the upshot is we're trying to put a defence together out of nothing.
Let Hutch come back, Sarr get fit etc and we'll start winning again. Remember we have no right to be in the top half of the table. Keep it real.
Agree with most of that but wouldn’t put much (if any) of the blame on Holmes and McIntyre. Granted, don’t think they’re the best partnership we’ll have, not quite commanding enough (although Holmes in particular has improved in that regard), but they’re being overworkedpaultheroyal wrote:I cant explain the frustration and borderline anger i had at the final whistle which carried on through the night till this morning. Ok, that might be an exaggeration but god was i peed off with what i watched last night.
We were absolutely awful. Leading up to our goal that was one of the worst first half performances i have seen for a long time and there has been many. How on earth we were 2 up was lets be honest, an utter joke. However, if you were like my mate who put on a fiver that we lost 3-2 at 28-1 in play then i am sure that softened the blow for him.
Just inviting pressure, sitting back from the get go. What has happened to the style of football that got us to such a great position. That decent press etc. Its almost like Ince has now got lost and doesnt know what to do with the players at his disposal. That bench was stronger than the first team.
And yet again, we go down and guess what, we come alive. Now that might be the normal reaction etc but least start the game like that.
Sarr and Hutchinson cant come back into this team quick enough. Going forward there is enough there but centre back pairing just does not cut it. Fornah, Loum, Hendrick needs another look too. Glimpses this season of absolute quality but too much tinkering and the flow of that midfield has been ripped apart.
Dreary me.
I agree, we didn't have to. I'm still also a bit baffled as to why we went with Hoilett at LB and two top class left backs on the bench . But he clearly doesn't trust a 442 with Holmes+TMac at CB against a decent side away.CountryRoyal wrote:We didn’t.Millsy wrote: I've since calmed down and can see it for what it was - a shit performance where 3-2 flattered us, but we forget we had to play a right back as CB, two of the worst performing defenders in recent history at as the other CBs, a n00b kid at RB and for some reason a winger at LB.
.
We could have played the right back at right back, our CBs (who I think you’re being incredibly harsh about) at CB, and either of our 2 left backs, at left back.
For a time, it did. But we were constantly under pressure, their CB's were playing in our half the majority of the time they had the ball, sometimes even 30-35 yards from goal, that's how deep we were. It's too much pressure to sustain for 75% of the match.windermereROYAL wrote:According to PInce the game plan worked, if they had defended any deeper they would have been in the car park.
The time wasting was clearly a part of the game plan they went out with as it started Minute 1, which, for me, is a fcuking horrendous way to approach a football match, and completely sets the wrong mentality for the players on the night.Gunny Fishcake wrote:Trying to sleep on thoughts before commenting , still fuming, Ince's tactics of time wasting and sitting on the 2-0 lead were shocking and lamentable
Agree. Can't just be launching aimless balls into an area where you'd anticipate they'd be, that's what we did last night out of desperation of getting the ball in there, but it was the same against QPR as well. Not saying we shouldn't be playing to his strengths, but in Hoilett, Ince and NGW, we have some pretty accomplished crossers of the ball. Get them travelling down the left channel into a good area and swing balls in towards Carroll and Meite coming in from the RW and we are easily capable of overpowering opponents that way. But it can't just be hopeful 50 yard diagonal punts, the keeper was just collecting them with ease in injury time last night.Royal Rother wrote:What also annoys me is that when Carroll is on the pitch we are ONLY hoofing the ball up to him, or somewhere near where he might end up if he sprints and launches himself at the usual pretty wayward hoof. Now he may be bloody good in the air, but he is also a good footballer with a pretty deft touch and we are completely negating / ignoring that facet of his game.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot] and 45 guests