...and Pauno is still the bossBrogue wrote:Anyway well done lads we added 20 pages 400 new posts to this thread today. 200 pages is on!!
...and Pauno is still the bossBrogue wrote:Anyway well done lads we added 20 pages 400 new posts to this thread today. 200 pages is on!!
If we lose Wednesday you`ll do it by Saturday.Brogue wrote:Anyway well done lads we added 20 pages 400 new posts to this thread today. 200 pages is on!!
He got the intel from his mate Ma Sivcoq?Zip wrote:No. No one was else was coming out with this stuff at the time.Snowflake Royal wrote:No you just repeat what other people are saying.Zip wrote:
Ok but still doesn’t explain how he got so much right. You don’t guess all that out of nowhere.
leon wrote:He got the intel from his mate Ma Sivcoq?Zip wrote:No. No one was else was coming out with this stuff at the time.Snowflake Royal wrote: No you just repeat what other people are saying.
I meant the other way round - to stop managers walking out on the club a la Pardew.Snowflake Royal wrote:Given how often managers get sacked it's pretty unlikely notice periods mean anything other than how much of your contract you get paid up.Horsham Royal wrote:or ...Hound wrote:...Not like he’s gone in and just torn up his contract and walked away without a pay off
He did exactly that after Fulham but he's got a 1 month notice clause in his contract.
So Dai said "breach of contract" you're working your notice or we sue.
Which brings us nicely to 14th Feb.
Do manager's contracts typically have notice clauses and, if so, for ho long?
Who knows!
The time we did under Bowen we were actually seemingly on the up at that point. Having said that, the board would argue that last season we had a DoF (Dayong Pang) as well as Pauno and finished 7th so that would be used as an improvement and they keep labelling the "unprecedented circumstances" this season.Zip wrote:We don’t seem to have any internal structure within the club. It just seems so amateurish.
Maybe there are clauses, but I'd be surprised if the 'compensation' amounted to any more than not having to pay him a penny more, just like if you or I walked out of our job tomorrow.Horsham Royal wrote:
Pauno: I've had enough of this (e.g. wanting to play Moore - told he can't). I'm off.
Club: Nope, that leaves us in the lurch. Work your notice or give us compensation.
Pauno: Drat. Ok I'll work my notice while you line up a replacement.
I would like to say there is no way he can be in the dugout given the speculation surrounding him, even if he's still technically the manager. However, this is Reading FC we are talking about. There will probably be all sorts of denials and sweeping of things under carpets.Brogue wrote:What do we think then, will he be gone tomorrow? Or will he be in the dug out on Wednesday still?
"On the up"? Bowen won just 5 home games from October and we had some shockers. Mullered 0-3 by Wigan at home and as for the Swansea game. Should have pulled the trigger on him the moment the season ended.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:The time we did under Bowen we were actually seemingly on the up at that point. Having said that, the board would argue that last season we had a DoF (Dayong Pang) as well as Pauno and finished 7th so that would be used as an improvement and they keep labelling the "unprecedented circumstances" this season.Zip wrote:We don’t seem to have any internal structure within the club. It just seems so amateurish.
I don't think the board believe what they've done in the last 1 and a bit seasons is actually wrong up until now.
He isn't going. He will be in the dugout until they find a replacement. Don't think the owners trust anyone in the backroom.Brogue wrote:What do we think then, will he be gone tomorrow? Or will he be in the dug out on Wednesday still?
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Nick Shorey my Lord!, Wallington Royal, Za Vas and 322 guests