He was pissed though.Stevie G wrote:As a measure of the top level thinking/pressure, SJM went on record just several weeks ago suggesting that we stick with Pauno.
He was pissed though.Stevie G wrote:As a measure of the top level thinking/pressure, SJM went on record just several weeks ago suggesting that we stick with Pauno.
Pretty sure it's been covered that FL approval only applies to playing staff.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:To be fair, it could also be EFL approval that's been holding up this process. It would also explain why we signed the likes of Andy Carroll and Brandon Barker outside of the transfer window. I know we are within our rights to do that, but I'm sure these are deals that were in the pipeline a while before they happened.
The EFL approval might involve both the sacking of Pauno as well as his replacement and what that means in terms of cost and wages. I can't see why it wouldn't be approved, but there probably are reasons for it taking time for it to do so.
We don't need approval from the EFL to sack the manager, nor is there any points deduction for doing so.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:To be fair, it could also be EFL approval that's been holding up this process. It would also explain why we signed the likes of Andy Carroll and Brandon Barker outside of the transfer window. I know we are within our rights to do that, but I'm sure these are deals that were in the pipeline a while before they happened.
The EFL approval might involve both the sacking of Pauno as well as his replacement and what that means in terms of cost and wages. I can't see why it wouldn't be approved, but there probably are reasons for it taking time for it to do so.
I have just read through our agreement in short form and yes, it is just playing staff where wages and fees are applied.Snowflake Royal wrote:Pretty sure it's been covered that FL approval only applies to playing staff.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:To be fair, it could also be EFL approval that's been holding up this process. It would also explain why we signed the likes of Andy Carroll and Brandon Barker outside of the transfer window. I know we are within our rights to do that, but I'm sure these are deals that were in the pipeline a while before they happened.
The EFL approval might involve both the sacking of Pauno as well as his replacement and what that means in terms of cost and wages. I can't see why it wouldn't be approved, but there probably are reasons for it taking time for it to do so.
COLIN!Zip wrote:Replace Pauno with who?
He has had no money to spend. No chance to strengthen in January. He deserves the summer to mould the squad to suit his playing style but will need a good start to next season that’s for sure
You don't have to look far to find other evidence to support that.Millsy wrote:Beginning to wonder if it's Dai just being stubborn. Pauno wants payout, we add pressure by protesting, he digs his heels in like a child. Great.
But he' sallowed to do what he likes - he owns the company, lock stock and barrel. He doesn't have to take notice of anyone.Snowflake Royal wrote:You don't have to look far to find other evidence to support that.Millsy wrote:Beginning to wonder if it's Dai just being stubborn. Pauno wants payout, we add pressure by protesting, he digs his heels in like a child. Great.
He's directly intervened on transfers, our captain...
It's really not hard to work out where the problem is.
Of course he's allowed to.Dirk Gently wrote:But he' sallowed to do what he likes - he owns the company, lock stock and barrel. He doesn't have to take notice of anyone.Snowflake Royal wrote:You don't have to look far to find other evidence to support that.Millsy wrote:Beginning to wonder if it's Dai just being stubborn. Pauno wants payout, we add pressure by protesting, he digs his heels in like a child. Great.
He's directly intervened on transfers, our captain...
It's really not hard to work out where the problem is.
That's the outcome when company law does not recognise that sports clubs are quite different than any other type of company.
Twas ever like this and will continue to be the case until legislation changes things.
A Reading season ticket.blythspartan wrote:If this thread gets to 200 pages do we all have to chip in £10.00 to Brogue’s PayPal account? What do you get on here for reaching 200 pages?
absolutely fcuk all and rightfully so. What is this weird obsession with number of pages? Who caresblythspartan wrote:If this thread gets to 200 pages do we all have to chip in £10.00 to Brogue’s PayPal account? What do you get on here for reaching 200 pages?
It's not the number of pages that is important but what you write on them that counts, quality over quantity and all thatHound wrote:absolutely fcuk all and rightfully so. What is this weird obsession with number of pages? Who caresblythspartan wrote:If this thread gets to 200 pages do we all have to chip in £10.00 to Brogue’s PayPal account? What do you get on here for reaching 200 pages?
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 595 guests