He's had two injury free seasons for us, and in those we had a playoff campaign and won the league with him playing well and being a big part of that. He's probably got what it takes to do a job for a bottom-half team.Coppelled_Streets wrote: Sorry Jem but you're never a Premier League player, .
He was used in a hustle and bustle type roll, of which he stated he felt he had a lot more to offer and it did frustrate him a bit (McDermott era). Effective non-the-less, but we've still not seen what else he can offer. For me he's high energy but as not proven otherwise, he doesn't offer a great deal more. Perfect at this level though, for me anyway.SCIAG wrote:He's had two injury free seasons for us, and in those we had a playoff campaign and won the league with him playing well and being a big part of that. He's probably got what it takes to do a job for a bottom-half team.Coppelled_Streets wrote: Sorry Jem but you're never a Premier League player, .
Agreed - Jem's style is well suited to the Championship but I doubt he has the capability to take the PL by storm. I think he could be offered the chance to be a squad player at a lower PL club and so he will have the choice of being a bench player at a team like Bournemouth - who will almost certainly get relegated again - or be a regular in a good Championship team. Personally I hope he stays.Coppelled_Streets wrote:He was used in a hustle and bustle type roll, of which he stated he felt he had a lot more to offer and it did frustrate him a bit (McDermott era). Effective non-the-less, but we've still not seen what else he can offer. For me he's high energy but as not proven otherwise, he doesn't offer a great deal more. Perfect at this level though, for me anyway.SCIAG wrote:He's had two injury free seasons for us, and in those we had a playoff campaign and won the league with him playing well and being a big part of that. He's probably got what it takes to do a job for a bottom-half team.Coppelled_Streets wrote: Sorry Jem but you're never a Premier League player, .
Pretty good summary.SCIAG wrote:Of that list:
Scott Sinclair - likely to have better options; WCBAP
Petr Cech - if Federici and Andersen both leave, he'd be good cover for Lincoln
Gareth McAuley - reasonably realistic, although old
Tal Ben Haim - rubbish
Scott Parker - under contract, can't see Fulham selling to a rival, WCBAP, not a position we should prioritise
Carlton Cole - decent Championship record, WCBAP, might have fitness issues
Robert Green -apparently wanted by Chelsea and Man City to help with home grown criteria. WCBAP.
Jay Spearing - worse than our current options, under contract
Jerome Thomas - the best suggestion yet. Getting on a bit though, and slightly worried about why he hasn't been loaned out...
Steven Reid - likely to retire
Matej Vydra - unlikely to be sold by the Pozzos after a good season.
Liam Ridgewell - designated player at the Portland Timbers so WCBAP. Possible loan in the off-season.
That list is just idle speculation by getreading and there is no suggestion Clarke is considering any of these. The list is pretty ridiculous to be honest - Cech?! You'r having a laff.Ian Royal wrote:Cant really begin to express how utterly underwhelmed I am by the suggestion Clarke wants to bring in players he'sworked with already and particularly that list.
It just seems that there is nothing about Clarke's management approach that chimes with what I want to see at the club.
Now that's just paper talk, but when are we going to get a positive sign?
At least he'd be familiar with the Madejski turf.72 bus wrote:Petr Cech - as cover for Lincoln, LOL
That was a thought I'd also had, that perhaps his agent is drumming up stories to try and force Reading's hand.mambo3 wrote:Jems propaganda machine is on full throttle, its almost laughable. Eddie Howe the rising Star of Managers is interested in any
Reading Player let alone Jem and Watford as well, both promoted Teams. See it to believe it.
Here you go:Ian Royal wrote:Cant really begin to express how utterly underwhelmed I am by the suggestion Clarke wants to bring in players he'sworked with already and particularly that list.
It just seems that there is nothing about Clarke's management approach that chimes with what I want to see at the club.
Now that's just paper talk, but when are we going to get a positive sign?
I doubt the club are stretched over Gunter and McCleary's wages or we wouldn't have extended their contracts, Williams is debatable but HRK and Pog are definitely on high figures.Elm Park Kid wrote:I think people may need to readjust their expectations a little:
Our current wage bill is probably unsustainable for club of Reading's means. So unless players like pog, mccleary, HRK, Gunter, williams go there will be very little to play with. It will just be a case of picking up lower league players looking for an opportunity or aging players hoping to get one or two last seasons at a 15-20k salary level before the retire. If Clarke can use his connections to get decent prospects on loan cheap I say do it. Ok, you're not building for the future but at least we'll stay in the championship and it'll give him a chance to bring in new players the following season once pog and co are out of contract.
Yeah, that's why I said it's just paper talk.Royalwaster wrote:That list is just idle speculation by getreading and there is no suggestion Clarke is considering any of these. The list is pretty ridiculous to be honest - Cech?! You'r having a laff.Ian Royal wrote:Cant really begin to express how utterly underwhelmed I am by the suggestion Clarke wants to bring in players he'sworked with already and particularly that list.
It just seems that there is nothing about Clarke's management approach that chimes with what I want to see at the club.
Now that's just paper talk, but when are we going to get a positive sign?
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 34 guests