CheLOLsea

[From Despair To Where?]

Yeah, I concede that finishing 2nd in a two horse race doesn't really equate to success but the general opinion in Spain is that Mourinho is a bit of (ok, a lot of) a dick who believes his own hype just a little too much. As for Italy, even Inter fans hate him.

[Ian Royal]

Who hooked who here Kes. You might want to take the pointy thing out of your cheek before answering.

[bcubed]

Officially bored of who rattled who arguments

[Ouroboros]

Officially bored of who rattled who arguments

RattLOLed

[sandman]

Yeah, I concede that finishing 2nd in a two horse race doesn't really equate to success but the general opinion in Spain is that Mourinho is a bit of (ok, a lot of) a dick who believes his own hype just a little too much. As for Italy, even Inter fans hate him.

Yep, the only people who liked him in Spain were the Ultras Sur and that was only because they identified with him because nobody likes them either.

[No Fixed Abode]

Sunderland 3-4 Chelsea

Lampard
Hazard (2)
Bardsley OG

[YateleyRoyal]

Sunderland 3-4 Chelsea

Lampard
Hazard (2)
Bardsley OG

Jeez kes, whichever way you look at it you let in 3 goals from Sunderland. That's bad

[NewCorkSeth]

Sunderland 3-4 Chelsea

Lampard
Hazard (2)
Bardsley OG

Jeez kes, whichever way you look at it you let in 3 goals from Sunderland. That's bad

I just tried looking at it every possible way. Looks bad.

[Starfish]

Sunderland 3-4 Chelsea

Lampard
Hazard (2)
Bardsley OG

Jeez kes, whichever way you look at it you let in 3 goals from Sunderland. That's bad

When Chelsea ultimately win the league by a point or two, those three points are going to look pretty good.

[southbank1871]

Sunderland 3-4 Chelsea

Lampard
Hazard (2)
Bardsley OG

Jeez kes, whichever way you look at it you let in 3 goals from Sunderland. That's bad

They won the game, doesn't really matter how.

[YateleyRoyal]

Sunderland 3-4 Chelsea

Lampard
Hazard (2)
Bardsley OG

Jeez kes, whichever way you look at it you let in 3 goals from Sunderland. That's bad

When Chelsea ultimately win the league by a point or two, those three points are going to look pretty good.

And if they lose the league on goal difference, those three conceded goals are going to look pretty bad.

[southbank1871]

In a season where United draw at Cardiff, City lose at Cardiff and Liverpool lose at Hull, any away win is a good result.

[soggy biscuit]

Top 10 PL goalscorers so far this season:

11 Aguero
9 Sturridge
9 Suarez
8 Lukaku
8 Ramsey
8 Remy
8 Rooney
7 Giroud
7 Van Persie
7 Touré

[YateleyRoyal]

Top 10 PL goalscorers so far this season:

11 Aguero
9 Sturridge
9 Suarez
8 Lukaku
8 Ramsey
8 Remy
8 Rooney
7 Giroud
7 Van Persie
7 Touré

I'm as anti-Chelsea as the next but I cant see what you're getting at here. Chelsea are near the top without relying on one main goalscorer. Good on them?

[soggy biscuit]

posted on the wrong thread

[soggy biscuit]

Friend of mine who is an Everton fan reckons their web forums are alive with talk that Lukaku's loan to them has a clause in it stating if they finish top 4 then he can join them permanently

it's the internet so probably not true

[YateleyRoyal]

Friend of mine who is an Everton fan reckons their web forums are alive with talk that Lukaku's loan to them has a clause in it stating if they finish top 4 then he can join them permanently

it's the internet so probably not true

Would LOL hard if it was. Wonder what the fee would be?

[southbank1871]

Why would Chelsea agree to that clause? Makes no sense.

[Pepe the Horseman]

Yeh, it's effectively saying if he does really well you can buy him, but if he's shit we'll have him back.

[soggy biscuit]

it's on the internet so probably not true but could have been part of a negotiation over wages or a loan fee paid maybe.

i have always suspected (though have nothing to back it up) that there are all sorts or weird and wonderful clauses in transfer or loan deals